Shifting the Transition Paradigm

  • Chavanne L. Peercy
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


The preceding examination of the impact of local leadership in internationally led democratic transition has provided various levels of analysis. While the main purpose of this study is to determine if the current democratic transition paradigm and its treatment of local leadership is effective in producing liberal democracy, it also illuminates the ways in which the leadership acts and effects change. The current transition paradigm assumes the appropriateness of the institutionalism model of leadership — that institutions fostered by the international community would control the behavior of the resulting leadership — and treats leadership as an output that can be transitioned itself. This analysis demonstrates an opposite reality.


International Community Local Leadership Transitional Justice Democratic Transition Peace Process 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Richmond, O. (2006) “The Linkage between Devious Objectives and Spoiling behavior in Peace Processes”, in Newman, E. and Richmond, O. (eds), Challenges to Peacebuilding, Managing Spoilers during Conflict Resolution (Tokyo: Linited Nations University Press).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stedman, S.J. (1997) “Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes”, International Security, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 5–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 4.
    Solana, J. (1999) “NATO’s Success in Kosovo”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chavanne L. Peercy 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chavanne L. Peercy
    • 1
  1. 1.Humphrey School of Public AffairsUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations