• Chavanne L. Peercy
Part of the Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies book series (RCS)


Mention Cambodia to people today and the images conjured up are most likely those of “farming cooperatives” and Toul Sleng, both images from the Khmer Rouge’s brutal Democratic Republic of Kampuchea of the 1970s. In fact, when conducting research in Cambodia for this particular study, it was next to impossible to convince individuals to discuss anything but Pol Pot and his Central Committee. The research could only be accomplished by first listening to and acknowledging personal stories or local legends of brutal times under the regime, and then of course guaranteeing that everything was confidential and, most importantly, anonymous. I have a particularly clear memory of listening attentively to one man’s moving story of how he managed to survive the Khmer Rouge by escaping a particularly violent farm where he was certain to die in order to move to another that he had heard had kinder “management.” After he finished his story of the Khmer Rouge, I asked him if perhaps we could talk about the current government of Cambodia, and in particular Hun Sen. I watched his expression change dramatically from one of contemplation and sadness to one of concern and what I identified as fear. He responded, “that is very risky,” as he glanced around to see if anyone in the small restaurant where we were drinking coffee could hear our exchange.


Political Party Liberal Democracy Local Leadership Democratic Institution Charismatic Leader 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Leifer, M. (1962) “The Cambodian Opposition”, Asia Survey, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gottesman, E. (2003) Cambodia after the Khmer Rouge, Inside the Politics of Nation Building (London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gordon, B. K. and Young, K. (1971) “The Khmer Republic; That Was the Cambodia That Was?”, Asian Survey, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 26–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 6.
    Lizee, P. (2000) Peace, Power and Resistance in Cambodia; Global Governance and the Failure of International Conflict Resolution (New York: St. Martin’s Press).Google Scholar
  5. 7.
    Pike, D. (1989) “The Cambodian Peace Process: Summer of 1989”, Asian Survey, Vol. 29, No. 9, pp. 842–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 12.
    Ngoc, D.H. (1991) “The Struggle for Peace in Cambodia”, Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 94.
    Richmond, O.P. and Franks, J. (2007) Liberal Hubris? Virtual Peace in Cambodia. Security Dialogue, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 95.
    Lilja, M. (2010) “Discourses of Hybrid Democracy: The Case of Cambodia”, Asian Journal of Political Science, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 96.
    Carothers, T. (2002) “The End of the Transition Paradigm”, Journal of Democracy Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Chavanne L. Peercy 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chavanne L. Peercy
    • 1
  1. 1.Humphrey School of Public AffairsUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations