Abstract
The development of the cosmonational parliament as a model of global governance has been in the making for many years, a result of the dispersion of the national population through colonialism, migration, and the establishment of diasporic communities. Until World War II, the appropriate conditions for its rise as a formal and constitutional organ of the state were yet to be set in place. The imperial parliament as a model of global governance, however, was restricted in its activities to territories under its jurisdiction.1 Although the imperial parliament expanded its sphere of influence beyond locality to reach people in faraway lands, and despite its crossfrontier territorial deployment, this model does not meet the characteristics of the cosmonational parliament, which also entails the governance of groups of people living outside the boundaries of territories of the state. The imperial parliament model was not cosmonational because its legislative activities were confined to the homeland and territorial colonies, and the relations between the former and the latter were set to be unequal by design. The cosmonational parliament is a different kind of a cross-border institution.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri, Empire (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000) and
David Held, Models of Democracy (Palo Alto: Stanford University Press, 1987).
Mark I. Choate, Emigrant Nation: The Making of Italy Abroad (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2008).
Jean-Pierre Cantégrit, Les Français de l’Etranger: La Troisième France (Paris: Economica, 1995) and
Joëlle Garriaud-Maylam, “La Représentation Parlementaire des Français de l’Etranger: 60 Ans d’Histoire Mouvementée (1944–2004),” Revue Politique et Parlementaire 106, nos. 1029–1030 (2004): 162–175.
International IDEA, Voting From Abroad: The International IDEA Handbook (Stockholm: International IDEA, 2007).
Tiljana Bartulac-Blanc, New Borders and Anomalies in the Balkans: Croatia’s Diaspora Constituency, Special Report (Washington, DC: National Endowment for Democracy, 2007).
Francesco Ragazzi, “Le Cas Croate: La Diaspora Comme Programme Politique,” in Loin des Yeux, Près du Coeur: Les Etats et Leurs Expatriés, ed. Stéphane Dufoix (Paris: Presses de Science Po, 2010), pp. 305–322 and
Daphne Winland, “‘We Are Now an Actual Nation’: The Impact of National Independence on the Croatian Diaspora in Canada,” Diaspora 4, no. 1 (1995): 3–30.
F. H. Colson, The Week (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1926);
E. Zerubavel, The Seven Day Circle: The History and Meaning of the Week (New York: Free Press, 1985); and
Jean-Paul Parisot, Calendriers et Chronologie (Paris: Masson, 1996).
Michel S. Laguerre, Urban Multiculturalism and Globalization in New York City (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).
Ravindra K. Jain, Nation, Diaspora, Trans-Nation: Reflections from India (New Delhi: Routledge, 2010) and
Katie Willis and Brenda Yeoh, eds., State/Nation/Transnation: Perspectives on Transnationalism in the Asia Pacific (New York: Taylor & Francis, 2004).
Copyright information
© 2013 Michel S. Laguerre
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Laguerre, M.S. (2013). Conclusion: Parliament of the Cosmonation. In: Parliament and Diaspora in Europe. Europe in Transition: The NYU European Studies Series. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280602_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280602_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44779-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-28060-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)