Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series ((MDC))

  • 609 Accesses

Abstract

The practice of virginity testing at Britain’s national and international borders first received national attention through a story published by The Guardian newspaper on 1 February 1979. This case involved a 35-year-old Indian woman who had arrived at Heathrow Airport on 24 January 1979, wishing to enter Britain to marry her fiancé, a British resident of Indian descent. The British legal regime at the time stipulated that people entering Britain to marry their fiancées/fiancés did not require an entry clearance or visa in those cases in which the marriage would take place within three months of their arrival. This woman, however, was subjected to an extensive investigation, which included a rudimentary gynaecological examination. Internal Home Office documents, disclosed only recently, state that the Immigration Officer in this case acted on the belief that her purported engagement status was not in line with her age group and that, in fact, she had already been married. Based on this view, the Immigration Officer ‘asked the doctor to determine whether she had had children’.1 A male doctor performed the examination and certified that the woman’s hymen was intact. This outcome meant that the woman’s story was deemed to be reliable and she was given conditional leave to enter Britain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Amrit Wilson, Finding a Voice: Asian Women in Britain (London: Virago Press, 1985) pp. 72–76

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cited in Vaughn Bevan, The Development of British Immigration Law (London: Routledge, 1986) p. 164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Alan Travis, ‘Virginity Tests for Immigrants “Reflected Dark Age Prejudices” of 1970s Britain’, The Guardian, 9 May 2011, http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2011/may/08/virginity-tests-immigrants-prejudices-britain?intcmp=239 (accessed 11 January 2014). This newspaper report was based on our articles: Evan Smith and Marinella Marmo, ‘Uncovering the “Virginity Testing” Controversy in the National Archives: The Intersectionality of Discrimination in British Immigration History’, Gender & History, 23/1, April 2011, pp. 147–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Marinella Marmo and Evan Smith, ‘Is There a Desirable Migrant? A Reflection of Human Rights Violations at the Border: The Case of “Virginity Testing”’, Alternative Law Journal, 35/4, December 2010, pp. 223–226.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See Gideon Ben-Tovim and John Gabriel, ‘The Politics of Race in Britain, 1962–1979: A Review of the Major Trends and of Recent Debates’, in Charles Husband (ed.), ‘Race’ in Britain: Continuity and Change (Hutchinson, London, 1982) p. 146

    Google Scholar 

  6. Peter Alexander, Racism, Resistance and Revolution (Bookmarks, London, 1987) p. 40

    Google Scholar 

  7. Keith Tompson, Under Siege: Racial Violence in Britain Today (Penguin, London, 1988) p. 70.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deborah Cheney, ‘Those Whom the Immigration Law Has Kept Apart — Let No-one Join Together: A View of Immigration Incantation’, in Delia Jarrett-Macauley (ed.), Reconstructing Womanhood, Reconstructing Feminism: Writings on Black Women (Routledge, London, 1996) pp. 58–84

    Google Scholar 

  9. Steve Cohen, Immigration Controls, the Family and the Welfare State (Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Helena Wray, ‘An Ideal Husband? Marriages of Convenience, Moral Gate-keeping and Immigration to the UK’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 8, 2006, pp. 303–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilson, Finding a Voice, pp. 72–86; Rachel A. Hall, ‘The Interaction of Gender and Ethnicity: An Exploration of British Immigration Control, Focusing on the Experiences of South Asian Women in West Yorkshire’, unpublished PhD thesis, University of Huddersfield, 2006; Rachel A. Hall, ‘When Is a Wife Not a Wife? Some Observations on the Immigration Experiences of South Asian Women in West Yorkshire’, Contemporary Politics, 8/1, 2002, pp. 55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amrit Wilson, Dreams, Questions, Struggles: South Asian Women in Britain (London: Pluto Press, 2006) pp. 76–78.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Notable exceptions include: Hall, ‘The Interaction of Gender and Ethnicity’; Avtar Brah, Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities (London: Routledge, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Nira Yuval-Davis, Floya Anthias and Eleonore Kofman, ‘Secure Borders and Safe Haven and the Gendered Politics of Belonging’, Ethnic & Racial Studies, 28/3, March 2005, pp. 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Michel Foucault, Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France 1977–1978 (Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–1976 (New York: Picador, 2003) p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Although Agamben, referring to the work of Karl Löwith, highlights the slippage between liberal democracies and dictatorship and the potential of democratic forms of government to become undemocratic and restrictive: ‘The contiguity between mass democracy and totalitarian states... does not have the form of sudden transformation.’ Giorgio Agamben, Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998) pp. 71–72.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Imogen Tyler, Revolting Subjects: Social Abjection and Resistance in Neoliberal Britain (London: Zed Books, 2013) p. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay in Abjection (New York: Columbia University Press, 1982) p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  20. For feminist critiques of Foucault, see Jana Sawicki, Disciplining Foucault: Feminism, Power and the Body (New York: Routledge, 1991)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lois McNay, Foucault and Feminism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Caroline Ramazanoglu (ed.), Up against Foucault: Explorations of Some Tensions between Foucault and Feminism (London: Routledge, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Susan J. Hekman (ed.), Feminist Interpretations of Michel Foucault (Pennsylvania, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Angela King, ‘The Prisoner of Gender: Foucault and the Disciplining of the Female Body’, Journal of International Women’s Studies, 5/2, 2004, pp. 29–39.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Allaine Cerwonka and Anna Loutfi, ‘Biopolitics and the Female Reproductive Body as the New Subject of Law’, Feminists@Law, 1/1, 2011 pp. 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Jordanna Bailkin, The Afterlife of Empire (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2012) pp. 164–170.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pratibha Parmar, ‘Gender, Race and Class: Asian Women in Resistance’, in Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies, The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain (London: Hutchinson, 1986) p. 245.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Anandi Ramamurthy, Black Star: Britain’s Asian Youth Movements (London: Pluto Press, 2013) p. 105.

    Google Scholar 

  29. See: Rahila Gupta, From Homebreakers to Jailbreakers: Southall Black Sisters (London: Zed Books, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Gita Sahgal, ‘Secular Spaces: The Experience of Asian Women Organizing’, in Gita Sahgal and Nira Yuval-Davis (eds), Refusing Holy Orders: Women and Fundamentalism in Britain (London: Virago Press, 1992) pp. 163–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2014 Evan Smith and Marinella Marmo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Smith, E., Marmo, M. (2014). Introduction. In: Race, Gender and the Body in British Immigration Control. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280442_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics