Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Accountability in Fostering Nonprofit Integrity

  • Chapter
Book cover Integrity in Organizations

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

  • 593 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will explore the special nature of integrity in the nonprofit sector and the key role that accountability plays in its attainment. Unless otherwise noted, the discussion draws from the nonprofit sector in the United States. It is expected, though, that most of the discussion will be widely applicable to all nonprofit organizations. Jeavons (2010, p. 188) describes integrity as the fundamental ethical characteristic of nonprofit organizations. Integrity is defined as “honesty writ large” — continuity between appearance and reality, between intention and action, and between promise and performance in every aspect of the organization. Integrity is critical for nonprofit organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • ABA Coordinating Committee on Nonprofit Governance 2005, Guide to nonprofit corporate governance in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley, Coordinating Committee on Nonprofit Governance, American Bar Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Bar Association 1993, Guidebook for directors of nonprofit corporations, Section on Business Law, American Bar Association, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arenson, K.W. 1995, April 4, ‘Former United Way chief guilty in theft of more than $600,000’, New York Times, pp. Al, A22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babcock, C.R. 1992, February 20, ‘3 large locals ask United Way about president’s spending’, Washington Post, p. A6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, M. 1990, Splitting the difference: compromise and integrity in ethics and politics, University of Kansas Press, Lawrence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J.T. & DiLorenzo, T.J. 1994, Unhealthy charities: hazardous to your health and wealth, Basic Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothwell, R.0.2000, ‘Trends in self-regulation and transparency of nonprofits in the U.S.’, The International Journal of Not-For-Profit Law, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 1–20, viewed 10 January 2012, <http://www.icnl.org/research/journal/vol4issl/art_l.htm>

  • California Registry of Charitable Trusts, Nonprofit Integrity Act of 2004, viewed 15 April 2012, http://caag.state.ca.us/charities/publications/nonprofit_integrity_act_ nov04.pdf

  • Collins, J.C. & Porras, J.I. 1996, ‘Building your company’s vision’, Harvard Business Review, September-October, pp. 65–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dede, M.J. 2009, ‘Ethics and nonprofit governance’, AllBusiness.com, viewed 20 January 2012, <http://www.allbusiness.com/society-social-assistance-lifestyle /ethics/13187231-l.html>

  • Drucker, P.E. 1989, ‘What business can learn from nonprofits’, Harvard Business Review, July-August, pp. 88–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. 1987, ‘Political theories of nonprofit organizations’, in Powell, W.W. (ed.), The nonprofit sector: a research handbook, Yale University Press, New Haven, pp. 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. 2010, ‘The many faces of nonprofit accountability’, in Renz D.O. (ed.), The jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, 3rd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 101–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A. & Weisband, B. 2007, Global accountabilities: participation, pluralism, and public ethics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R.E. 1995, ‘Accountability in organizational life: problems in opportunity for nonprofits’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 181–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaul, G.M. & Borowski, N.A. 1993, Free ride the tax-exempt economy, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibelman, M. & Gelman, S.R. 2001, ‘Very public scandals: nongovernmental organizations in trouble’, Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 49–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, J. S. 1994. The United Way scandal: an insider’s account of what went wrong and why, John Wiley & Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwill Industries International, viewed 20 February 2012, <http://www.goodwill.org/about-us/our-mis sion/>

  • Guide Star, viewed 10 Februar y 2012, <http://www2.guidestar.org/ Report Or gani zation. aspx?ein=13-1635294#program-list>

  • Habitat for Humanity of Greater Indianapolis, viewed 20 February 2012, <http://www.indyhabitat.org/learn-about-us/mission-vision-values/>

  • Heathfield S.M. 2012, ‘Build a strategic framework: mission statement, vision, values’, viewed 12 January 2012, <http://humanresources.about.com/cs/strategic planning 1/a/str ate gicplan. htm >

  • Hendricks M., Plantz M., & Pritchard K. 2008. ‘Measuring outcomes of United Way-funded programs: expectations and reality’, in Carman J.G. & Fredericks K.A. (eds.), Nonprofits and evaluation: new directions for evaluation, 119, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 13–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, R.D. 1994, ‘Conclusion: preparing for the future of nonprofit management’, in Herman, R.D. (ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 616–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, T. 2002, ‘Board accountability: lessons from the field’, Nonprofit management and leadership, 12: 409–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Independent Sector, viewed 20 February 2012, <http://www.independentsector.org/compendium_of_standards>

  • Indiana Secretary of State, viewed 5 January 2012, <http://www.in.gov/sos /busine ss/2 4 26. htm>.

  • Internal Revenue Service, viewed 2 February 2012a, <http://www.irs.gov/publications /p557/ch06.html#en_US_2011_publinkl000200494>

  • Internal Revenue Service, viewed 15 February 2012b, <http://www.irs.gov/charities /charitable/article/0.,id=96099,00.html>

  • Jeavons, T.H. 1992, ‘When management is the message: relating values to management practice in nonprofit organizations’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 403–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeavons, T.H. 2010, ‘Ethical nonprofit management’, in Renz D.O. (ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, 3rd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 178–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, K.P. 1996, Managing for accountability: preserving the public trust in public and nonprofit organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, E.K. 2006, ‘Is it time to address selective disclosure for nonprofit organizations?’ working paper no. 33.7, The Häuser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopczynski, M.E. & Pritchard, K. 2004, ‘The use of evaluation by nonprofit organizations’, in Wholey J.S., Hatry H.P., & Newcomer, K.E. (eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation, 2nd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 649–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Nonprofits, viewed 5 January 2012, <http://www.marylandnonprofits.org/dnn/Strengthen/Standardsfor Excellence. aspx>

  • McLaughlin, J.A. & Jordan, G.B. 2004, ‘Using logic models’, in Wholey, J.S., Hatry, H.P., & Newcomer, K.E. (eds.), Handbook of practical program evaluation, 2nd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 7–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster (online), definition of accountability, viewed 12 January 2012, <http://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/accountability/>

  • Miller, B. 1993, January 12, ‘Bracing for big cuts in United Way aid’, Chronicle of Philanthropy, p. 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J.L. 2002, ‘The board as monitor of organizational activity: the applicability of agency theory to nonprofit boards’, Nonprofit management and leadership, 12: 429–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, V. ScTassie, B. 1994, ‘Evaluating the effectiveness of nonprofit organizations’, in Herman, R.D. (ed.), The Jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 303–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nezhina, T. & Brudney J. 2010, ‘The Sarbanes-Oxley Act: more bark than bite for nonprofits’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, pp. 275–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrower, F. & Stone, M. 2006, ‘Governance: research trends, gaps, and future prospects.’ in Powell, W.W. & Steinberg, R. (eds.), The nonprofit sector: a research Handbook, Yale University Press, Hew Haven, pp. 612–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simross, L. 1992, April 28, ‘Charities in a bind’, Washington Post, p. C5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staff 1994, September 17, ‘United Way and Mr. Aramony’ (editorial), Washington Post, p.A14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starling, G. 1986, Managing the public sector, 3rd edn., Dorsey Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J.C. 2010, ‘Outcome assessment and program evaluation’, in Renz D.O. (ed.), The jossey-Bass handbook of nonprofit leadership and management, 3rd edn, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 401–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Way of America, viewed 14 February 2012, <http://liveunited.org/pages /mission-and-goals/>

  • United Way of America 1996, Measuring program outcomes: a practical approach, United Way of America, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. 2006, The Market for virtue: the potential and limits of corporate social responsibility, Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei-Skillern, J., Austin, J.E., Leonard, H. & Stevenson, H. 2007, Entrepreneur ship in the social sector, Sage, Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winch, P. 1972, Ethics and action, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Wolfgang Bielefeld
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Goethe Business School, Germany

    Wolfgang Amann

  2. Silesian University of Technology, Poland

    Agata Stachowicz-Stanusch (Associate Professor of Management) (Associate Professor of Management)

Copyright information

© 2013 Wolfgang Bielefeld

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bielefeld, W. (2013). The Role of Accountability in Fostering Nonprofit Integrity. In: Amann, W., Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. (eds) Integrity in Organizations. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280350_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation