Skip to main content

Getting Our Minds Out of the Gutter: Fallacies that Foul Our Discourse (and Virtues that Clean it Up)

  • Chapter
Virtues in Action
  • 227 Accesses

Abstract

We humans aren’t very nice to each other — especially when we discuss controversial topics. We speak too quickly and too loudly. We don’t listen. We’re unfair. We put our own views in the best light, and our dissenters’ views in the worst. These tendencies are extremely common, and they transcend economic, religious, and political boundaries. If you doubt this, ask yourself whether the people on “the other side” of your favorite controversial issue are always reasonable and fair-minded. You may well think they aren’t. Perhaps they are the ones ruining the discussion. But of course they probably think similar thoughts about the people on your side. This suggests that most of us think that humans treat each other poorly when we discuss controversial issues. Those most familiar with our public discourse share this impression. In a recent article on the state of political discourse, New York Times writer Andrew Rosenthal quips, “There’s lots of evidence that the national conversation is near the ocean floor.”1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Other sources of help include R. Ritchhart (2002) Intellectual Character: What it is, Why it Matters, and How to Get it (San Francisco, Jossey-Bass)

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Howard-Snyder, R Howard-Snyder and R. Wasserman (2009) The Power of Logic (New York: McGraw Hill)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Roberts and J. Wood (2007) Intellectual Virtues (New York: Oxford University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Baehr (2011) The Inquiring Mind: On the Intellectual Virtues & Virtue Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. J. Locke (1983) A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. James Tully (Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing), 51.

    Google Scholar 

  6. For a detailed development of this line of thought, see T. Kelly (2005) “The Epistemic Significance of Disagreement”, in J. Hawthorne and T. Szabo-Gendler (eds) Oxford Studies in Epistemology (New York: Oxford University Press), 167–96.

    Google Scholar 

  7. R. Feldman (2006) “Epistemological Puzzles about Disagreement”, in S. Hetherington (ed.), Epistemology Futures (New York: Oxford University Press)

    Google Scholar 

  8. D. Christensen (2009) “Disagreement as Evidence: The Epistemology of Controversy”, Philosophy Compass 4, 756–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. See the discussion of Abelson’s work in T. Gilovich (1991) How We Know What Isn’t So (New York: The Free Press), 85–87.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Tavris and E. Aronson (2007) Mistakes Were Made (but not by me): Why We Justify Foolish Beliefs, Bad Decisions, and Hurtful Acts (New York: Harcourt), 13.

    Google Scholar 

  11. L. Festinger (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson)

    Google Scholar 

  12. See L. Ross and R. Nisbett (1991) The Person and the Situation (New York: McGraw Hill).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Robert K. Garcia and Nathan L. King

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Garcia, R.K., King, N.L. (2013). Getting Our Minds Out of the Gutter: Fallacies that Foul Our Discourse (and Virtues that Clean it Up). In: Austin, M.W. (eds) Virtues in Action. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137280299_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics