Skip to main content

Abstract

In time, the language of treacherous objects which developed in the Jacobite era subsided into kitsch as less controversial souvenirs of memory and exchange had done. This was logical enough: as the risk of prosecution for Jacobite sympathies declined, so too did the tendency to exchange commitments and ideas through objects in a defined, ritualistic way. The looseness and variability of sentiment took over, and with it the reification of charisma beyond politics and oppositional memorialization into kitsch and memory as a marketplace or lieu, no longer lived but remembered in various places and through various things, constructed to make sense of defeat rather than displayed, circulated and trafficked in prospect — or hope — of victory. Objects began to lose the atmosphere of tension through which they had previously been exchanged. Even cant diminished as a language of challenge to order, and the hidden allusive words or phrases of thieves, radicals and Jacobites subsided into slang for less focused group purposes, such as the use of buckish cant to allow sexual terms to be mentioned in front of ladies.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Janet Sorensen, ‘Vulgar Tongues: Canting Dictionaries and the Language ol the People in Eighteenth-Century Britain’, Eighteenth-Century Studies 37: 3 (2004), pp. 435–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Fleming, Politics and Provincial People: Sligo and Limerick, 1691–1761 (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2010), pp. 61

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mary Helen Thuente, ‘Liberty, Hibernia and Mary Le More: United Irish Images of Women’, in Dáire Keogh and Nicholas Furlong (eds), The Women of 1798 (Dublin: Four Courts, 1998), pp. 9–25

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eugene Charlton Black, The Association (Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1963), pp. 153

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dana Rubin, ‘Imperial Disruption: City, Nation and Empire in the Gordon Riots’, in Ian Haywood and John Seed (eds), The Gordon Riots (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), pp. 93–114

    Google Scholar 

  6. Henry Cockburn, Memorials of his Time (Edinburgh: Mercat Press, 1971 (1856)), p. 68.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. L. McCracken, ‘The United Irishmen’, in T. Desmond Williams (ed.), Secret Societies in Ireland (Diblin: Gill and Macmillan, 1973), pp. 58–67

    Google Scholar 

  8. Thomas Bartlett, ‘Defenders and Defenderism in 1795’, Irish Historical Studies 24 (1985), pp. 373–94

    Google Scholar 

  9. James S. Donnelly, Jr, Captain Rock: The Irish Agrarian Rebellion of 1821–1824 (Cork: Collins Press, 2009), pp. 97

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tom Garvin, ‘Defenders, Ribbonmen and Others: Underground Political Networks in Pre-Famine Ireland’, in C. H. E. Philpin (ed.), Nationalism and Popular Protest in Ireland (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), pp. 219–44

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tom Garvin, ‘Defenders, Ribbonmen and Others’, in Philpin, Nationalism, pp. 219–44; see also M. R. Beames, ‘The Ribbon Societies’, in Philpin, Nationalism, pp. 245–63; Thomas Bartlett, ‘Bearing Witness: Female Evidence in Courts Martial Convened to Suppress the 1798 Rebellion’, in Keogh and Furlong, Women of 1798, pp. 64–86 (69); Claire Connolly, A Cultural History of the Irish Novel, 1790–1829 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012), p. 77.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Thuente, ‘Liberty Hibernia and Mary Le More’, p. 22. See Robert Forbes, The Lyon in Mourning: or a collection of speeches letters journals etc relative to the affairs of Prince Charles Edward, ed. Henry Paton, 3 vols (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press/Scottish History Society, 1895), I: 241

    Google Scholar 

  13. Donnelly, Captain Rock, pp. 22, 51, 104, 110, 139, 302, 305; Garvin, ‘Defenders, Ribbonmen and Others’, pp. 233–4; Beames, ‘Ribbon Societies’, p. 253; Maura Cronin, ‘Memory Story and Balladry: 1798 and Its Place in Popular Memory in Pre-Famine Ireland’, in Laurence M. Geary (ed.), Rebellion and Remembrance in Modern Ireland (Dublin: Four Courts, 2001), pp. 112–34

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ronan Kelly, Bard of Erin: The Life of Thomas Moore (London: Penguin, 2009 (2008)), p. 47

    Google Scholar 

  15. George Rudé, The Crowd in History 1730–1848, 2nd edn (London: Lawrence and Wishart, 1981 (1964)), p. 157

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bob Harris, ‘Political Protests in the Year ol Liberty, 1792’, in Bob Harris (ed.), Scotland in the Age of the French Revolution (Edinburgh: John Donald, 2005), pp. 49–78

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mark Schoenlield, British Periodicals and Romantic Identity (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009), p. 58

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raoul Girardet, ‘The Three Colours: Neither White nor Red’, in Pierre Nora et al., Realms of Memory: The Construction of the French Past, ed. Lawrence D. Kritzman, trans Arthur Goldhammer (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996 (1984–92)), pp. 2–26

    Google Scholar 

  19. David Andress, The Terror (London: Abacus, 2006 (2005)), p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Samuel Bamford, Passages in the Life of a Radical, intr. Tim Hilton (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984 (1884)), p. 241

    Google Scholar 

  21. Louis James (ed.), Print and the People 1819–1851 (London: Allen Lane, 1976), p. 66

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paul Monod, ‘Pierre’s White Hat?’, in Eveline Cruickshanks (ed.), By Force or By Default? The Revolution of 1688–1689 (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1989), pp. 159–89.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Donnelly, Captain Rock, pp. 132, 147; Gary Owen, ‘Nationalism without Words: Symbolism and Ritual Behaviour in the Repeal “Monster Meetings” of 1843–5’, in James S. Donnelly, jr, and Kerby A. Miller (eds), Irish Popular Culture 1650–1850 (Dublin: Irish Academic Press, 1988), pp. 242–69

    Google Scholar 

  24. John Miller, Religion in the Popular Prints 1600–1832 (Cambridge: Chadwyck-Healey, 1986), p. 340

    Google Scholar 

  25. Murray Pittock (ed.), Robert Burns in Global Culture (Lewisburg: Bucknell University Press, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Emilia Szaffner, ‘The Hungarian Reception of Walter Scott in the Nineteenth Century’, in Murray Pittock (ed.), The Reception of Sir Walter Scott in Europe (London: Continuum, 2006), pp. 138–56.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jonathan M. Wooding, ‘A Monument “where pilgrims may worship and patriotism be renewed” — the Sacred Nationalism of the Australian ‘98 Centenary’, in Laurence M. Geary (ed.), Rebellion and Remembrance in Modern Ireland (Dublin: Four Courts, 2001), pp. 196–213

    Google Scholar 

  28. J. M. Roberts, The Mythology of the Secret Societies (London: Secker & Warburg, 1972), pp. 2

    Google Scholar 

  29. Marianne Elliott, Robert Emmet: The Birth of a Legend (London: Profile, 2003), p. 196.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wooding, ‘Monument’, p. 212. See Daniel Szechi, ‘The Jacobite Theatre of Death’, in Eveline Cruickshanks and Jeremy Black (eds), The Jacobite Challenge (Edinburgh: John Donald, 1988), pp. 57–73.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Matt Treacy, The IRA, 1956–69 (Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press, 2011), pp. 21–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lynn Abrams, Oral History Theory (London: Routledge, 2010), pp. 79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Murray Pittock

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pittock, M. (2013). Postscript: The Making of Memory. In: Material Culture and Sedition, 1688–1760. Palgrave Studies in the Enlightenment, Romanticism and the Cultures of Print. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137278098_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics