Abstract
A reader of the biographies of Ted Hughes will draw from them a narrative of his time at Cambridge something like this: despite doing badly in the entrance exam he was awarded an Exhibition on the strength of poems submitted by his teacher; as one of a minority of working-class grammar-school boys he was alienated from the social environment of the university; he hated the academic study of literature, which stifled his creativity, and therefore switched to Archaeology and Anthropology for the final year of his degree; despite publishing nothing under his own name while at Cambridge he had a reputation as a poet. This narrative constitutes a ‘myth’ of the creative individual struggling in a hostile academic environment: a romantic myth that suits Hughes’ image as a poet. I will be questioning this myth, arguing that parts of it are demonstrably untrue, and that others don’t necessarily bear the weight of interpretation put on them. This has consequences for the way we regard the relation of Hughes’ poetry to the academy, and more generally of creative writing to criticism.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Diane Middlebrook (2003), Her Husband: Hughes and Plath – A Marriage (New York: Viking), p. 8
Neil Roberts (2006), Ted Hughes: A Literary Life (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 1.
Elaine Feinstein (2001), Ted Hughes: The Life of a Poet (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson), p. 28.
Brian Cox (1999), ‘Ted Hughes (1930–1998): A Personal Retrospect’, Hudson Review 52:1, pp. 31–2.
D.D. Bradley (1999), ‘Ted Hughes 1930–1998’, Pembroke College Cambridge Society Annual Gazette 73, p. 23.
Daniel Huws (2010), Memories of Ted Hughes 1952–1963 (London: Richard Hollis), pp. 15–16.
Glen Fallows (1999), ‘Reminiscences’, Martlet (Cambridge: Pembroke College), p. 8.
Drue Heinz (1995), ‘Ted Hughes: The Art of Poetry LXXI’, Paris Review 134, p. 85.
Philip Hobsbaum (1999), ‘Ted Hughes at Cambridge’, The Dark Horse 8, p. 7.
A. Alvarez (1960), ‘An Outstanding Young Poet’, The Observer, 27 March, p. 22.
W.B. Yeats (1963), ‘A Poet to his Beloved’, in Collected Poems (London: Macmillan), p. 70.
Philip Hobsbaum (1998), ‘Philip Hobsbaum in Conversation with Nicholas Tredell’, PN Review 119, p. 22.
T.S. Eliot (1988), The Letters of T.S. Eliot, Volume 1: 1898–1922, ed. Valerie Eliot (London: Faber & Faber), p. 58.
F.R. Leavis (1964), Revaluation [1936] (Harmondsworth: Peregrine), p. 49.
F.R. Leavis (1975), The Living Principle: ‘English’ as a Discipline of Thought (London: Chatto and Windus), pp. 96–7.
T.S. Eliot (1951), ‘Philip Massinger’, in Selected Essays (London: Faber & Faber), pp. 209–10.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 Neil Roberts
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roberts, N. (2013). Ted Hughes and Cambridge. In: Wormald, M., Roberts, N., Gifford, T. (eds) Ted Hughes: From Cambridge to Collected. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276582_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276582_3
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-27660-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27658-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)