Skip to main content

The Galvanic ‘Unhuman’: Technology, the Living Dead and the ‘Animal-Machine’ in Literature and Culture

  • Chapter
The Zombie Renaissance in Popular Culture
  • 451 Accesses

Abstract

The history of the zombie is part of a larger set of discourses generated out of industrial modernity relating to notions of the ‘unhuman’ and concepts of ‘unlife’ that develop from unease over the intersection of technology and human life. Beginning with the golem of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, a collection of dead body parts galvanised into life, such concerns continue through twentieth-century modernity into the present to include undead things such as zombies, which are created by the diseases or viruses that first destroy the vestiges of the human life before returning the zombie to unthinking mobility, and in technological life-forms such as robots and cyborgs, where technology animates machine-life or reanimates and modifies the human to extend it into the posthuman. Initial concerns with the simulation of life and its threat to the status of humanity develop different narratives within representation that further question, for example, the claims of humans to have exclusive access to consciousness, autonomy and agency (androids and AIs) or generate in the cyborg a postmodern blurring of boundaries that collapses distinctions between living and dead, subject and object, or human and machine. Within this, the conceptualisation of zombies as living dead is important because of the permeation of speculative and science-fiction texts by the technological zombie (robots, androids, cyborgs), a creature that is variously either empty of consciousness, delibidinalised or animated into life by technology rather than by what are referred to in H.P. Lovecraft’s ‘Herbert West — Reanimator’ as natural ‘life-motions’ (Lovecraft, 2008, p. 35) intrinsic to a self-regulating organism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 100.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Baldick, Chris (1987) In Frankenstein’s Shadow: Myth, Monstrosity, and Nineteenth-century Writing, Oxford: Clarendon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bisson, Terry (1991) ‘They’re Made Out of Meat’, Omni, 13 (7), (April 1991), 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boon, Kevin (2011) ‘The Zombie as Other: Mortality and the Monstrous in the Post-Nuclear Age’, in Deborah Christie and Sarah Juliet Lauro (eds.) Better Off Dead: The Evolution of the Zombie as Post-Human, New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 50–60.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Botting, Fred (1991) Making Monstrous: ‘Frankenstein’, Criticism, Theory, Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Richard (1992) Dead Girls, London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canguilheim, Georges (1992) ‘Machine and Organism’, in Jonathan Crary and Stanford Kwinter (eds.) Incorporations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 44–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlyle, Thomas (1908) Sartor Resartus. On Heroes, Hero-worship and the Heroic in History, London: Dent.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, David J. (1996) The Conscious Mind: In Search of a Fundamental Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René (1968) Discourse on Method and the Meditations, Translated by RE. Sutcliffe, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, Justin D. and Graulund, Rune (2013) Grotesque, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rrankish, Keith (2007) ‘The Anti-Zombie Argument’, The Philosophical Quarterly, 229 (October 2007), 650–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, William (1986) Neuromancer, London: Grafton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindle, Maurice (1990) ‘Vital Matters: Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein and Romantic Science’, Critical Survey, 2 (1), 29–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauro, Sarah Juliet and Embry Karen (2008) ‘A Zombie Manifesto: The Nonhuman Condition in the Era of Advanced Capitalism’, Boundary 2, 35 (1), 85–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovecraft, H.P. (2008) ‘Herbert West — Reanimator’, in edited with an Afterword by Stephen Jones, Necronomicon: The Best Weird Tales of H.P. Lovecraft, London: Gollancz, pp. 34–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, M.P. (2006) ‘Zombies and the Case of the Phenomenal Pickpocket’, Synthese, 149 (1) (March 2006), 37–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Möckel-Rieke, Hannah (1998) ‘Media and Memory in Thomas Pynchon’s Vineland’, Amerikastudien/American Studies, 43 (1), 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noya, José Liste (1997) ‘“Ghostbusters”: Fantasy and Postmodern Death in Thomas Pynchon’s Vineland’, The Journal of Narrative Technique, 27 (2), (Spring 1997), 149–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punday, Daniel (2003) ‘Pynchon’s Ghosts’, Contemporary Literature, 44 (2), (Summer 2003), 250–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pynchon, Thomas (1990) Vineland, Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley, Mary (1994 [1818]) Frankenstein 1818 Text, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelley Mary (1992 [1831]) Frankenstein, edited by Johanna M. Smith, Boston: Bedford.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Fran Mason

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mason, F. (2015). The Galvanic ‘Unhuman’: Technology, the Living Dead and the ‘Animal-Machine’ in Literature and Culture. In: Hubner, L., Leaning, M., Manning, P. (eds) The Zombie Renaissance in Popular Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276506_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics