Abstract
The relationship between technology and risk is not straightforward. The current period of development in Western societies, whether conceptualised as late modernity’ (Giddens, 1991), ‘liquid modernity’ (Bauman, 2000) or ‘postmodernity’ (Harvey, 1990), is defined by the increasing prominence of information and communication technology (ICT) in our lives. As indicated above, this is often viewed in a positive manner, with ICTs presented as empowering. At the same time society is seen to be organized around exposure to new forms of risk often brought about by technological change (Beck, 1992), including a rapidly evolving global economy and demands for an increasingly flexible workforce. New technologies have also been associated with other dangers including inappropriate content and use, surveillance and overuse (Byron, 2008). Whether the increasing proliferation of ICT facilitates the reproduction of such risks or militates against them is debatable. As a way of contributing to this debate, risk is not viewed here as a generic feature of contemporary society, but as a set of ideas which are constructed and reproduced through specific political discourses with very real consequences.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
The number one benefit of information technology is that it empowers people to do what they want to do. It lets people be creative. It lets people be productive. It lets people learn things they didn’t think they could learn before, and so in a sense it is all about potential.
(Steve Ballmer, Chief Executive, Microsoft, 2005)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ballmer, S. (2005) Microsoft Corporation Alamo Area Community Information System (AACIS) Unlimited Potential Grant Announcement, San Antonio, Texas, 17 February.
Balloch, S. and Taylor, M. (eds) (2001) Partnership Working: Policy and Practice. Bristol: Policy Press.
Bauman, Z. (2000) Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
BBC (2010) ‘UK Net Use Grows despite Digital Inequalities’, www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-11734910 [Accessed 14 December 2011].
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. New Delhi: Sage.
BECTA (2007) The Use of ICT in Further Education. GfK NOP Social Research.
Beech, R. and Roberts, D. (2008) Assistive Technology and Older People, Research Briefing 28. London: Social Care Institute of Excellence.
Bennett, C. (2010) ‘If You’re Not Online These Days You’re A Second-Class Citizen’, The Observer, 26 May.
Bradbrook, G. and Fisher, J. (2004) Digital Equality: Reviewing Digital Inclusion Activity and Mapping the Way Forwards (Citizens Online).
Byron, T. (2008) Safer Children in a Digital World: The Report of the Byron Review. London: Department for Children, Schools and Families.
Calhoun, C. (2006) ‘The Privatization of Risk’, Public Culture, 18(2), 257–63.
Cameron, A. (2006) ‘Geographies of Welfare and Exclusion: Social Inclusion and Exception’, Progress in Human Geography, 30(3), 396–404.
Carter, S. (2009) Digital Britain: The Interim Report. London: Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
Castells, M. (2010) The Rise of the Network Society, 2nd edn, Chichester: Wiley.
Clarke, J. (2005) ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilised, Abandoned?’ Critical Social Policy, 25(4), 447–63.
Clarke, M. (2011) ‘Army of Volunteers to Push to Tackle “digital exclusion”’, Fresh Business Thinking, www.freshbusinessthinking.com/news.php?CID=4andNID=8402andTitle=Army+of+volunteers+to+tackle+’digital+exclsion [Accessed 15 December 2011].
Clayton, J. and Macdonald, S. J. (2013) ‘The Limits of Technology: Social Class, Occupation and Digital Inclusion in the City of Sunderland, England’, Information, Communication and Society, DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012. 748817.
Clayton, J., Macdonald, S. J. and Wilcock, A. (2010) City of Sunderland Digital Inclusion Evaluation Final Report. Sunderland: University of Sunderland.
Comet (2012) Press Release, http://press.comet.co.uk/index.php?cID=304& cType=news [Accessed 27 May 2012].
Cross, M. (2008) ‘Digital Inclusion Isn’t Just About Playing Santa Claus’, The Guardian, 1 May.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2008) Delivering Digital Inclusion: An Action Plan for Consultation. London: HMSO.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2009) Empowering Communities to Influence Local Decision Making. London: HMSO.
Devins, D., Darlow, A. and Smith, V. (2003) ‘Lifelong Learning and Digital Exclusion: Lessons from the Evaluation of an ICT Learning Centre and an Emerging Research Agenda’, Regional Studies, 36(8), 941–5.
Digital Inclusion Team (2007) The Digital Inclusion Landscape in England: Delivering Social Impact through Information and Communications Technology. London: Digital Inclusion Team.
Feneira, J. and Rocha, M. E. M. (2010) ‘Digital Democracy: Beyond the Idea of Distributive Justice’. In S. Albagli and M. L. Maciel (eds) Information, Power and Politics: Technological and Institutional Mediations. Plymouth: Lexington Books, pp. 189–206.
Fink, C. and Kenny, C. J. (2003) ‘W(h)ither the Digital Divide?’ The Journal of Policy, Regulation and Strategy for Telecommunications, 5, 15–24.
Foucault, M. (2007) Security, Territory, Population, Lectures at the College de France 1977–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Francis, C. (2009) ‘Digital Inclusion — a Government Perspective’, IT in the Community Conference, Sunderland, UK, 1 February.
Giddens, A. (1991) Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1998) The Third Way: The Renewal of Social Democracy. London: Wiley.
Gillies, V. (2005) ‘Meeting Patents’ Needs? Discourses of “Support” and “Inclusion” in Family Policy’, Critical Social Policy, 25(1), 70–90.
Graham, S. (2002) ‘Bridging Urban Digital Divides? Urban Polarization and Information and Communication Technologies’, Urban Studies, 39(1), 33–56.
Hall, S. (2003) ‘New Labour’s Double-Shuffle’, Soundings, 24, 10–24.
Hampton, K. and Wellman, B. (2003) ‘Neighbouring in Netville: How the Internet Supports Community and Social Capital in a Wired Suburb’, City and Community, 2(4), 277–311.
Harvey, D. (1990) The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hopkin, D. and Atkinson, H. (2011) ‘The Localism Agenda’, Local Economy, 26(8), 625–26.
Hunt, A. (2010) Mind the Gap: Assessing the Impact of Reduced Government Spending on the North East Economy. Newcastle: One North East.
Imrie, R. (2004) ‘Governing the Cities and the Urban Renaissance’. In C. Johnstone and M. Whitehead (eds) New Horizons in British Urban Policy: Perspectives on New Labour’s Urban Renaissance. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 129–42.
Kaščák, O. and Pupala, B. (2011) ‘Governmentality — Neoliberalism — Education: The Risk Perspective’, Journal of Pedagogy, 2(2), 145–60.
Klecan, E. (2008) ‘Bringing Lost Sheep into the Fold: Questioning the Discourse of the Digital Divide’, Information Technology and People, 21(3), 267–82.
Klein, D. (2011) ‘Why Business Can’t Afford to Ignore the 9 Million’, National Digital Conference, London, UK 12 May.
Lane-Fox, M. (2011) Race Online 2012: Manifesto for a Networked Nation. London: Office of the Digital Champion.
Lazzarato, M. (2009) ‘Neoliberalism in Action: Inequality, Insecurity and the Reconstitution of the Social’, Theory, Culture and Society, 26(6), 110–34.
Leitch, S. (2006) Leitch Review of Skills: Prosperity for all in the Global Economy — World Class Skills. London: HMSO.
Lemke, T. (2007) ‘An Indigestible Meal? Foucault, Governmentality and State Theory’, Distinktion: Scandinavian Journal of Social Theory, 15, 43–64.
Lessenich, S. (2011) ‘Constructing the Social Self: Mobilisation and Control in the “Active Society”’. In U. Brockling, S. Krasmann and T. Lemke (eds) Governmentality: Current Issues and Future Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 304–20.
Levitas, R. (1998) The Inclusive Society? Social Exclusion and New Labour. London: Macmillan.
Levitas, R. (1999) New Labour and Social Exclusion — Citizenship and Social Exclusion Panel. Bristol: University of Bristol.
Lupton, D. (2006) ‘Sociology and Risk’. In G. Mythen and S. Walklate (eds) Beyond the Risk Society: Critical Reflections on Risk and Human Security. Maidenhead: Open University Press, pp. 11–24.
Macfarlane, K. (2010) ‘Social Inclusion Policy: Producing Justice or Retribution?’ Journal of Social Inclusion, 1(2), 133–50.
Margetts, H. (2006) ‘E-Government in Britain — A Decade On’, Parliamentary Affairs, 59(11), 250–65.
Maude, R (2011) National Digital Inclusion Conference, London, 13 May.
Mawson, J. (2001) ‘The End of Social Exclusion? On Information Technology Policy as a Key to Social Inclusion in Large European Cities’, Regional Studies, 35(9), 861–77.
McQuaid, R. W., Lindsay, C. and Greig, M. (2004) ‘“Reconnecting” the Unemployed: Information and Communication Technology and Services for Jobseekers in Rural Areas’, Information, Communication and Society, 7(3), 364–88.
Morris, E. (2009) Independent Review of ICT User Skills. London: Department of Business Innovation and Skills.
New Economics Foundation (2011) Cutting It: The ‘Big Society’ and the New Austerity. London: New Economics Foundation.
Osborne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992) Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
Peters, M. (2001a) ‘National Education Policy Constructions of the “Knowledge Economy”: Towards a Critique’, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(1), 1–22.
Peters, M. (2001b) ‘Education, Enterprise Culture and the Entrepreneurial Self: A Foucauldian Perspective’, Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.
Policy Action Team (PAT) 15 (2000) Closing the Digital Divide: Information and Communication Technologies in Deprived Areas. London: DTI.
Phipps, L. (2000) ‘New Communication Technology: A Conduit for Social Exclusion?’ Information Communication and Society, 3(1), 39–68.
PricewaterhouseCoopers (2009) Champion for Digital Inclusion — The Economic Case for Digital Inclusion, http://www.parliamentandinternet.org.uk/uploads/Final_report.pdf [Accessed 17 November 2011].
Race Online 2012 (2011) ‘100,000 Volunteers to Help Get Millions More Online by the Olympics Press Release’, 11 May.
Raco, M. and Imrie, R. (2000) ‘Governmentality and Rights and Responsibilities in Urban Policy’, Environment and Planning A, 32, 2187–204.
Rose, N. and Miller, P. (1992) ‘Political Power Beyond the State: Problematics of Government’, British Journal of Sociology, 43(2), 173–205.
Rose, D. and O’Reilly, K. (1998) The ESRC Review of Government Social Classifications. London/Swindon: ONS/ESRC.
Selwyn, N. (2002) Defining the’Digital Divide’: Developing a Theoretical Understanding oflnequalities in an Information Age, Cardiff: Cardiff University.
Selwyn, N. (2004) ‘Reconsidering Political and Popular Understandings of the Digital Divide’, New Media and Society, 6(3), 341–62.
Selwyn, N. (2008) ‘The Use of ICTs in Education and the Promotion of Social Inclusion: A Critical Perspective from the UK’, Educação & Sociedade, 29(104), 815–50.
Shibata, K. (2008) ‘Neo-Liberalism, Risk and Spatial Governance in the Developmental State: Japanese Planning in the Global Economy’, Critical Planning, 15, 92–118.
Social Exclusion Unit (2001) Preventing Social Exclusion: A Report by the Social Exclusion Unit. London: Cabinet Office.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) New Risks, New Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thompson, G. (2007) ‘Responsibility and Neo-Liberalism’, Open Democracy, http://www.opendemocracy.net/article/responsibility_and_neo_liberalism [Accessed 13 October 2011].
UK Government (1999) Modernising Government White Paper. London: HMSO.
UK Government (2005a) Connecting the UK: Digital Strategy. London: HMSO.
UK Government (2005b) Transformational Government: Enabled by Technology. London: HMSO.
UK Government (2006) Inclusion through Innovation: Tackling Social Exclusion through New Technologies. London: HMSO.
UK Government (2008) Delivering Digital Inclusion-An Action Plan for Consultation. London: HMSO.
UK Online Centres (2007) Transformational Government for the Citizen. London: Simpson Carpenter.
UK Online Centres (2009) Does the Internet Improve Lives? London: Fresh Minds.
Warschauer, (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Webb, S. (2006) ‘Can ICT Reduce Social Exclusion? The Case of an Adults’ English Language Learning Programme’, British Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 481–507.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2013 John Clayton
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Clayton, J. (2013). Technologies of Power? Constructing Digital Exclusion, Risk and Responsibility. In: Kearney, J., Donovan, C. (eds) Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276087_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276087_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44651-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27608-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social Sciences CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)