Skip to main content

Risky Populations and Risky Identities: The Regulation of Trust and Relationships between Adults and Children

  • Chapter
Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice
  • 157 Accesses

Abstract

While risk is now a key focus of attention in modern society and one that influences most aspects of people’s day-to-day lives, in the area of child welfare it has had a particular impact on the development of policy and practice in the UK over the last few decades. Concern about risks to children have been greatly influenced by the overarching anxieties of the ‘risk society’ and its preoccupation with the many uncertain future risks generated by modernisation. The Internet, the economic situation and future employment prospects are just some of the factors that are seen to be making the lives of children and young people more risky now than in the past. Much of this concern focuses on the possible risks involved in children’s relationships with adults. These include the public anxiety about the dangers to children of abuse, neglect or, in extreme cases, even death, within the family setting, or the more general fear of male predators preying on children in the wider community. Although figures show that the probability of non-accidental child deaths is very small (Kearney, 2013) and that the threat from paedophiles is even less likely (Kitzinger, 1999; Corby, 2000) anxiety about risks to children have increased, rather than diminished. In this field, as with so many other aspects of modern society, the concern is now with the ‘distribution of bads rather than goods’ (Beck, 1992, p. 48).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alaszewski, A. and Burgess, A. (2007) ‘Risk, Time and Reason’, Health, Risk and Society, 9(4), 349–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldgate, J., Tunstill, J. and McBeath, G. (1992) National Monitoring of the Children Act: Part III Section 17-The First Year. Oxford: Oxford University/NCVCCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. (2010). ‘ISA Decision-Making: Barring the Innocent’. In M. Barrett, S. White and D. Wastell (eds) Why We Should Scrap the Vetting Database. Manifesto Club, pp. 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bichard Inquiry Report (2004) A Public Inquiry Report on Child Protection Procedures in Humberside Police and Cambridgeshire Constabulary Particularly the Effectiveness of Relevant Intelligence-based Recording, Vetting Practices since 1995 and Information Sharing with Other Agencies; HC6S3. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burchall, G., Gordon, C. and Miller, P. (1991) The Foucault Effect. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, I. and Drakeford, M. (2003) Social Policy, Social Welfare and Scandal: How British Public Policy is Made. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office (2010) Programme for Government. London: Whitehall, http://www.hmg.gov.uk/programmeforgovernment [Accessed 20 December 2012].

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, L. (2012) Listening to Troubled Families. London: Department of Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castel, R. (1991) ‘From Dangerousness to Risk’. In G. Burchall, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 281–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chief Secretary to the Treasury (2003) Every Child Matters. London: Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colton, M., Drury, C. and Williams, M. (1995) ‘Children in Need: Definition, Identification and Support’, British Journal of Social Work, 25, 711–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corby, B. (2000) Child Abuse: Towards a Knowledge Base, 2nd edn. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Critcher, C. (2003) Moral Panics and the Media. Buckingham: Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, P. (2003) ‘The CRB Explained: How the Criminal Records Bureau Operates’, The Guardian, 17 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dale, P., Davies, M., Morrison, T. and Waters, J. (1986) Dangerous Families: Assessment and the Treatment of Child Abuse. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, M. (1999) ‘Risk, Calculable and Incalculable’. In D. Lupton (ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–59.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Denney, D. (2005) Risk and Society. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Health (DH) (1995) Child Protection: Messages from Research. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwall, R. (1989) ‘Some Problems about Predicting Child Abuse and Neglect’. In O. Stevenson (ed.) Child Abuse: Public Policy and Professional Practice. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, pp. 28–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, F. (2003) Neighbours from Hell: The Politics of Behaviour. London: Politicos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979) ‘On Governmentality’, Ideology and Consciousness, 6, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furedi, F. and Bristow, J. (2010) Licensed to Hug, 2nd edn. London: Civitas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, P. M. (2009) ‘Transforming’ Children’s Services? Social Work, Neoliberalism and the ‘Modern’ World. Berkshire: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. (1991) ‘Government Rationality: An Introduction’. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon and P. Miller (eds) The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Hemel Hempstead: Harverster Wheatsheaf, pp. 1–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubin, D. (1998) Sex Offending against Children: Understanding the Risk. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggerty, K. and Ericson, R. (2000) ‘The Surveillant Assemblage’, British Journal of Sociology, 51(4), 605–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1993) Disclosure of Criminal Records for Employment Vetting Purposes (Cm 2319) Annex C., para. 10. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (1996) On the Record (Cm 3308). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2010) ‘The Vetting and Barring Scheme Guidance’, Report (March 2010). London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office (2011) Vetting and Barring Remodeling Review: Report and Recommendations. London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office/Department of Health and Social Security (DHSS) (1985) Disclosure of Criminal Convictions of those with Access to Children (Joint Review). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Home Office, Department of Education and Science and Department of Health and Social Security (1986) Protection of Children: Disclosure of Criminal Background of those with Access to Children (Circular HOC (86) 44). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Independent Safeguarding Authority (ISA) (2009) Guidance Notes for the Barring Decision Making Process. The Board of the Independent Safeguarding Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. and Scott, S. (1999) ‘Risk Anxiety and the Social Construction of Childhood’. In D. Lupton (ed.) Risk and Sociocultural Theory: New Directions and Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 86–107.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, J. (2013) ‘Perceptions of Non-Accidental Child Deaths as Preventable Events: The Impact of Probability Heuristics and Biases on Child Protection Work’, Health, Risk and Society, 15(1), 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. (2002) Risk, Social Policy and Welfare. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitzinger, J. (1999) ‘Researching Risk and the Media’, Health Risk and Society, 1(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laming, H. (2003) The Victoria Climbié Inquiry: Report of an Inquiry by Lord Laming. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K. (2008) Social Work, Politics and Society: From Radicalism to Orthodoxy. The Policy Press: Bristol.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manifesto Club (2006) The Case Against Vetting: How the Child Protection Industry is Poisoning Adult-Child Relationships, 16 October, http://www.manifestoclub.com/hubs/vetting [Accessed 15 November 2012].

  • Manifesto Club Briefing Document (2012) ‘32 Million CRB Checks since 2002: The Best Way to Spend £1.5 Billion?’ http://www.manifestoclub.com/filesTotal_CRBs_-_briefing_document.pdf [Accessed 15 May 2012].

  • Metcalfe, C. (2008) ‘Making Sense of Sex Offender Risk and the Internet’. In P. Kennison and A. Goodman (eds) Children as Victims. Exeter: Learning Matters, pp. 37–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2010) The Munro Review of Child Protection: Part One: A Systems Analysis. London: Department for Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munro, E. (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection: Final Report: A Child-Centred System. Cm 8062. London: The Stationary Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. (2004) Risk, Uncertainty and Government. London: Glasshouse Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (2006) Safeguarding Childhood: Early Intervention and Surveillance in Late Modern Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N (2009) ‘From Seebohm to Think Family. Reflections on 40 Years of Policy Change of Statutory Children’s Social Work in England’, Child and Family Social Work, 14, 68–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N (2010) ‘“From Dangerousness to Risk”: The Growing Importance of Screening and Surveillance Systems for Safeguarding and Promoting the Well Being of Children in England’, Health, Risk & Society, 12 (1), 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N (2011) ‘Child Protection and Safeguarding in England: Changing and Competing Conceptions of Risk and Their Implications for Social Work’, British Journal of Social Work, 41(5), 854–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, P., Duncan, S. and Gray, M. (1993) Beyond Blame: Child Abuse Tragedies Revisited. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996) ‘Psychiatry as a Political Science: Advanced Liberalism and the Administration of Risk’, History of the Human Sciences, 9(2), 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scourfield, P. (2007) ‘Social Care and the Modem Citizen: Client, Consumer, Service User, Manager and Entrepreneur’, British Journal of Social Work, 37(1), 107–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T (2002) ‘Employment Screening and the Criminal Records Bureau’, Industrial Law Journal, 31(1), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unell, J. (1992) Criminal Record Checks within the Voluntary Sector: An Evaluation of the Pilot Schemes. Berkhamsted, UK: Volunteer Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetting and Barring Scheme ‘Draft Guidance’, 12 May 2009, cited in Manifesto Club (2009) Regulating Trust: Who will be on the Vetting Database (briefing document), http://www.manifestoclub.com [Accessed 9 November 2012].

  • Wastell, D. and White, S. (2011) ‘Making Kitsch the Enemy: The “Monstrous Carbuncle” of the UK’s Vetting and Barring Scheme’. In M. Nuttgens, A. Gadatsch, K. Kautz, I. Schirmer and N. Blinn (eds) Governance and Sustainability in Information Systems, IFIP AICT 366, London: Springer, pp. 105–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, S. and Wastell, D. (2010) ‘Catching Sex Offenders: Vigilance is the Best Safeguard’. In M. Banett, S. White and D. Wastell (eds) Why We Should Scrap the Vetting Database. Manifesto Club, pp. 13–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Jeremy Kearney

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kearney, J. (2013). Risky Populations and Risky Identities: The Regulation of Trust and Relationships between Adults and Children. In: Kearney, J., Donovan, C. (eds) Constructing Risky Identities in Policy and Practice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137276087_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics