Skip to main content

Mediatization of Political Organizations: Changing Parties and Interest Groups?

  • Chapter
Mediatization of Politics

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the mediatization of politics at the meso level of political organizations. According to the theoretical framework of this book, our issue is located on the fourth dimension of mediatization, “the degree to which political actors are governed by a political logic or by media logic” (Strömbäck, 2008, p. 234; see also Strömbäck & Dimitrova, 2011). Our theoretical argument will challenge the idea of a single and homogenous media logic and of a clear dichotomy of political “versus” media logic. Instead, we want to argue that political organizations are influenced by a diversity of political as well as media logics. To develop our argument, we will first discuss what kind of actors political organizations like parties and interest groups are and what we can learn about them from organizational theories. Secondly, we will propose that we should broaden our scope by natural and open system views of organizations. Thirdly, we will reformulate the concept of mediatization at an organizational and institutional level. Fourthly, we will present some empirical results from surveys of party and interest-group organizations to illustrate our theoretical argumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altheide, D. L., & Snow, R. P. (1979). Media Logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmeppen, K.-D. (2006). Journalismus und Medien als Organisation: Leistungen, Strukturen und Management. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The Third Age of Political Communication: Influences and Features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brants, K., & van Praag, P. (2006). Signs of Media Logic: Half a Century of Political Communication in the Netherlands. Javnost- The Public, 13(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., Tsfati, Y., & Sheafer, T. (2008). The Influence of Presumed Media Influence in Politics: Do Politician’s Perceptions of Media Power Matter? Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 331–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the News: The News Media as a Political Institution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, T. E. (2006). The News Media as a Political Institution: Looking Backward and Looking Forward. Political Communication, 23(2), 159–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooren, F., Kuhn, T., Cornelissen, J. P., & Clark, T. (2011). Introduction to the Special Issue: Communication, Organizing and Organization: An Overview. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1149–1170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daschmann, G. (2009). Qualität von Fernsehnachrichten: Dimensionen und Befunde. Eine Forschungsübersicht. Media Perspektiven, 5, 257–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donges, P. (2006). Medien als Institutionen und ihre Auswirkungen auf Organisationen: Perspektiven des soziologischen Neo-Institutionalismus für die Kommunikationswissenschaft. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 54(4), 563–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donges, P. (2008). Medialisierung politischer Organisationen: Parteien in der Mediengesellschaft. Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, F. (2013). Mediatization as a Challenge: Media Logic Versus Political Logic. In H. Kriesi, S. Lavanex, F. Esser, J. Matthes, M. Bühlmann & D. Bochsler (Eds.), Democracy in the Age of Globalization and Mediatization (pp. 155–176). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunter, A. C., & Storey, J. D. (2003). The Influence of Presumed Influence. Journal of Communication, 53(2), 199–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Political Communication in Media Society: Does Democracy Still Enjoy an Epistemic Dimension? The Impact of Normative Theory on Empirical Research. Communication Theory, 16(4), 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjarvard, S. (2008). The Mediatization of Society: A Theory of the Media as Agents of Social and Cultural Change. Nordicom Review, 29(2), 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarren, O., & Vogel, M. (2011). Leitmedien als Qualitätsmedien: Theoretisches Konzept und Indikatoren. In R. Blum, H. Bonfadelli, K. Imhof & O. Jarren (Eds.), Krise der Leuchttürme öffentlicher Kommunikation. Vergangenheit und Zukunft der Qualitätsmedien (pp. 17–29). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K. B. (2008). Media. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 2811–2817). Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentges, E., Brändli, M., Donges, P., & Jarren, O. (2012). Die Kommunikation politischer Interessengruppen in Deutschland: Adressaten, Instrumente und Logiken. SCM, 1(3–4), 381–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentges, E., Brändli, M., Donges, P., & Jarren, O. (2013). Communication of Political Interest Groups in Switzerland: Addressees, Channels and Instruments. SCOMS, 13(1), 33–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kepplinger, H. M. (2002). Mediatization of Politics: Theory and Data. Journal of Communication, 52(4), 972–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiefer, M.-L. (1996). Unverzichtbar oder überflüssig? Öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk in der Multimedia-Welt. Rundfunk und Fernsehen, 44(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurke, L. B. (1988). Does Adaptation Preclude Adaptability? Strategy and Performance. In L. G. Zucker (Ed.), Institutional Patterns and Organizations. Culture and Environment (pp. 199–222). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landerer, N. (2013). Rethinking the Logics: A Conceptual Framework for the Mediatization of Politics. Communication Theory, 23(3), 239–258. doi: 10.1111/comt.12013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundby, K. (2009). Media Logic: Looking for Social Interaction. In K. Lundby (Ed.), Mediatization: Concept, Changes, Consequences (pp. 101–119). New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., & Olson, J. P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52(4), 943–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcinkowski, F. (2005). Die “Medialisierbarkeit” politischer Institutionen. In P. Rössler & F. Krotz (Eds.), Mythen der Mediengesellschaft — the Media Society and its Myths (pp. 341–369). Konstanz, Germany: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. (1987). Media Logic and Party Logic in Campaign Coverage: The Italian General Election of 1983. European Journal of Communication, 2(1), 81–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. (2008a). Media Logic. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 2930–2932). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G. (2008b). Media Logic. In L. L. Kaid & C. Holtz-Bacha (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Political Communication (Vol. 2, pp. 445–446). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzoleni, G., & Schulz, W. (1999). “Mediatization” of Politics: A Challenge for Democracy? Political Communication, 16(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhee, R. D., & Canary, H. (2008). Organizational Structure. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Communication (pp. 3471–3476). Oxford, Maiden: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes. The Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orton, D. J., & Weick, K. E. (1990). Loosely Coupled Systems: A Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 15(2), 202–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, L. L., Nicotera, A. M., & McPhee, R. D. (2009). Introduction: Communication Constitutes Organization. In L. L. Putnam & A. M. Nicotera (Eds.), Building Theories of Organization: The Constitutive Role of Communication (pp. 1–20). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryfe, D. M. (2006a). Guest Editor’s Introduction: New Institutionalism and the News. Political Communication, 23(2), 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, D. M. (2006b). The Nature of News Rules. Political Communication, 23(2), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saxer, U. (1999). Der Forschungsgegenstand der Medienwissenschaft. In J.-F Leonhard, H.-W. Ludwig, D. Schwarze & E. Straßner (Eds.), Medienwissenschaft: Ein Handbuch zur Entwicklung der Medien und Kommunikationsformen. 1. Teilband (pp. 1–14). Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, W. (2004). Reconstructing Mediatization as an Analytical Concept. European Journal of Communication, 19(1), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and Organizations: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis. In W. R. Scott & J. W. Meyer (Eds.), Institutional Environments and Organizations. Structural Complexity and Individualism (pp. 55–80). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and Organizations. 2nd Edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R. (2003). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. 5th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W. R., & Meyer, J. W. (1991). The Organization of Societal Sectors: Propositions and Early Evidence. In P.J. DiMaggio & W. W. Powell (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis (pp. 108–140). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, B. H. (2006). A Research Agenda for an Institutional Media. Political Communication, 23(2), 145–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staber, U., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational Adaptive Capacity: A Structuration Perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 408–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J. (2008). Four Phases of Mediatization: An Analysis of the Mediatization of Politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 13(3), 228–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). Mediatization and Media Interventionism: A Comparative Analysis of Sweden and the United States. International Journal of Press/Politics, 16(1), 30–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strömbäck, J., & van Aelst, P. (2013). Why Political Parties Adapt to the Media: Exploring the Fourth Dimension of Mediatization. International Communication Gazette, 75(4), 341–358. doi: 10.1177/1748048513482266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, J. R., Cooren, F., Giroux, N., & Robichaud, D. (1996). The Communicational Basis of Organization: Between the Conversation and the Text. Communication Theory, 6(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Aelst, P., Maddens, B., Noppe, J., & Fiers, S. (2008). Politicians in the News: Media or Party Logic? Media Attention and Electoral Success in the Belgian Election Campaign of 2003. European Journal of Communication, 23(2), 193–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S., & Gibson, R. (2009). European Political Organizations and the Internet. In A. Chadwick & P. N. Howard (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Internet Politics (pp. 25–39). London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational Organizations as Loosely Coupled Systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1979). The Social Psychology of Organizing. 2nd Edition. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, S. (2012). Politics as Usual? Revolution, Normalization and a New Agenda for Online Deliberation. New Media & Society, 14(2), 244–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Patrick Donges and Otfried Jarren

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Donges, P., Jarren, O. (2014). Mediatization of Political Organizations: Changing Parties and Interest Groups?. In: Esser, F., Strömbäck, J. (eds) Mediatization of Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137275844_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics