Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Decision-Making in Organisations

  • Chapter
Project Governance

Abstract

As previous chapters have discussed, project governance provides the management structures, policies, processes, roles and responsibilities which help ensure that (a) organisations choose projects which support their business strategy; (b) the objectives of business investment are translated into the right project objectives, activities and tasks; and (c) the project management structures and processes are in place such that implementation can be managed in line with objectives and business expectations. All of this is fundamentally about the organisational capability to make the right decisions at key points in the life of a project — where what is ‘right’ is a complex and uncertain matter on which multiple stakeholders will hold many different views. The effectiveness of project governance can therefore be seen in terms of how it supports organisational decision-making around projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alderman, N., Ivory, C., McLoughlin, I. and Vaughan, R., 2005. Sense-Making as a Process within Complex Service-Led Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 23 (5), pp. 380–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amason, A. C., 1996. Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (1), pp. 123–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C., 1990. Overcoming Organizational Defenses: Facilitating Organizational Learning. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Argyris, C. and Schön, D. A., 1974. Theory in Practice: Increasing Professional Effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, R., Crawford, L. and Ward, S., 2006. Fundamental Uncertainties in Projects and the Scope of Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (8), pp. 687–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballard, G. and Howell, G. A., 2003. Lean Project Management. Building Research & Information, 31 (2), p. 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J., Gleadle, P., Hailey, V. H. and Willmott, H., 2005. Managing Change Across Boundaries: Boundary-Shaking Practices. British Journal of Management, 16 (4), pp. 261–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balogun, J. and Johnson, G., 2004. Organizational Restructuring and Middle Manager Sensemaking. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (4), pp. 523–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist, T., Hallgren, M., Nilsson, A. and Soderholm, A., 2010. Project-as-Practice: In Search of Project Management Research that Matters. Project Management Journal, 41 (1), pp. 5–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., 1998. Practical Reason: On the Theory of Action. Cambridge, UK: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., 1998. Narrative, Politics and Legitimacy in an IT Implementation. Journal of Management Studies, 35 (1), pp. 35–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A. D., Stacey, P. and Nandhakumar, J., 2008. Making Sense of Sensemaking Narratives. Human Relations, August 1, 61 (8), pp. 1035–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunsson, N., 1982. The Irrationality of Action and Action Rationality — Decisions, Ideologies and Organizational Actions. Journal of Management Studies, 19 (1), pp. 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson, J. M. and Anderson, S. R. 2000. Applying Large-Group Interaction Methods in the Planning and Implementation of Major Change Efforts. Public Administration Review, 60 (2), pp. 143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, D. and Badham, R., 1999. Power, Politics, and Organizational Change: Winning the Turf Game. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, E. and Green, M., 2004. Making Sense of Change Management: A Complete Guide to the Models, Tools and Techniques of Organizational Change. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrusciel, D., 2006. Considerations of Emotional Intelligence (El) in Dealing with Change Decision Management. Management Decision, 44 (5), pp. 644–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., 1999. A Theory of Information Systems Based on Improvisation. In W. L. Curry and R. Galliers, eds, Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicmil, S., 2006. Understanding Project Management Practice through Interpretative and Critical Research Perspectives. Project Management Journal, 37 (2), pp. 27–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicmil, S., Williams, T., Thomas, J. and Hodgson, D., 2006. Rethinking Project Management: Researching the Actuality of Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, A. E., 1991. Social Worlds/Arenas Theory as Organizational Theory. In D. R. Maines, ed., Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. Aldine de Gruyter, pp. 119–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P., 1972. A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17 (1), pp. 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., 1991. Anselm Strauss: An Intellectual Biography. In A. Strauss and D. R. Maines, eds, Social Organization and Social Process: Essays in Honor of Anselm Strauss. pp. 17–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, L. and Pollack, J., 2004. Hard and Soft Projects: A Framework for Analysis. International Journal of Project Management, 22 (8), pp. 645–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, T. G. and Worley, C. G., 2008. Organization Development & Change. 9th edn. Mason, USA: South-Western Pub.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G., 1963. A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (publisher Prentice Hall, not Blackwell ): Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czarniawska-Joerges, B., 1997. A Narrative Approach to Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T., 1994. Re-Engineering: Business Change of Mythic Proportions? MIS Quarterly, 18 (2), pp. 121–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, P. and Buchanan, D., 2005. The Way it Really Happened: Competing Narratives in the Political Process of Technological Change. Human Relations, 58 (7), pp. 845–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Meyer, A., Loch, C. H. and Rich, M. T., 2002. Managing Project Uncertainty: From Variation to Chaos. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43 (2), pp. 60–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunphy, D. C. and Stace, D. A., 1988. Transformational and Coercive Strategies for Planned Organizational Change: Beyond the O. D. Model. Organization Studies, January 1, 9 (3), pp. 317–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, J. E., Ashford, S. J., O’Neill, R. M. and Lawrence, K. A., 2001. Moves that Matter: Issue Selling and Organizational Change. Academy of Management Journal, 44 (4), pp. 716–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., 1999. Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44 (2), pp. 350–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., 2003. Framing for Learning: Lessons in Successful Technology Implementation. California Management Review, 45 (2), pp. 34–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A., Roberto, M. A. and Watkins., M., 2003. A Dynamic Model of Top Management Team Effectiveness: Managing Unstructured Task Streams. Leadership Quarterly, 14 (3), pp. 297–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. C. and Smith, D. M., 2006. Too hot to handle? How to Manage Relationship Conflict. California Management Review, Fall, 49 (1), pp. 6–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Everett, J., 2002. Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu. Organizational Research Methods, 5 (1), pp. 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. and Ford, L., 2005. Deadline Busting: How To Be A Star Performer. Lincoln, USA: iUniverse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D. and Ford, L. W., 1995. The Role of Conversations in Producing Intentional Change in Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 20 (3), pp. 541–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, J. D. and Ford, L. W., 2003. Conversations and the Authoring of Change. In D. J. Holman and R. Thorpe, eds, Management and Language: The Manager as a Practical Author. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fortune, J. and White, D., 2006. Framing of Project Critical Success Factors by a Systems Model. International Journal of Project Management, (24), pp. 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M., 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y., 1998. Psychoanalytic Contributions to the Study of the Emotional Life of Organizations. Administration and Society, July 1, 30 (3), pp. 292–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandz, J. and Murray, V. V., 1980. The Experience of Workplace Politics. The Academy of Management Journal, 23 (2), pp. 237–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkel, H., 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A., 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D. A. and Chittipeddi, K., 1991. Sensemaking and Sensegiving in Strategic Change Initiation. Strategic Management Journal, 12 (6), pp. 433–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gioia, D.A. and Thomas, J.B., 1996. Identity, Image, and Issue Interpretation: Sensemaking During Strategic Change in Academia. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41 (3), pp. 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E., 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, S., 2006. The Management of Projects in the Construction Industry: Context, Discourse and Self-Identity. In D. Hodgson and S. Cicmil, eds, Making Projects Critical. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C., 1996. Understanding Power: Bringing about Strategic Change. British Journal of Management, 7 (s1), pp. S3–S16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. and Clegg, S. R., 1996. Some Dare Call it Power. In R. S. Clegg, C. Hardy and W. R. Nord, eds, Handbook of Organisation Studies. London: Sage, pp. 622–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holman, P., Devane, T. and Cady, S., 2007. Change Handbook: The Definitive Resource on Today’s Best Methods for Engaging Whole Systems. San Francisco, USA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hope, O., 2010. The Politics of Middle Management Sensemaking and Sensegiving. Journal of Change Management, 10 (2), pp. 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L., 1982. Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. and Searle, R. H., 2004. Harnessing Diversity and Collective Action in the Top Management Team. Long Range Planning, 37 (5), pp. 399–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarzabkowski, P. and Spee, A. P., 2009. Strategy-as-Practice: A Review and Future Directions for the Field. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11 (1), pp. 69–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. and Karsten, H., 2008. Giddens’s Structuration Theory and Information Systems Research. MIS Quarterly, 32 (1), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M., Stein, B. A. and Jick, T. D., 1992. The Challenge of Organizational Change: How Companies Experience it and Leaders Guide it. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D. and Murray, F., 1992. Politics and Pain in Managing Information Technology: A Case Study from Insurance. Organization Studies, 13 (2), pp. 211–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, L. and Howell, G., 2002a. The Theory of Project Management: Explanation to Novel Methods. Brazil: 10th Conference of International Group for Lean Construction, pp. 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koskela, L. and Howell, G., 2002b. The Underlying Theory of Project Management is Obsolete. In PMI Research Conference, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotter, J. P., 1995. Leading Change: Why Transformation Efforts Fail. In Harvard Business Review on Change. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langley, A., Mintzberg, H., Pitcher, P., Posada, E. and Saint-Macary, J., 1995. Opening up Decision Making: The View from the Black Stool. Organization Science, 6 (3), pp. 260–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, A., Denker, G. R. and Shenhar, A. J., 1996. Simultaneous Management: The Key to Excellence in Capital Projects. International Journal of Project Management, 14 (4), pp. 189–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, H. G. and Rossmoore, D., 1994. Politics and the Function of Power in a Case Study of IT Implementation. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11 (3), p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M., Welsh, M., Dehler, G. and Green, S., 2002. Product Development Tensions: Exploring Contrasting Styles of Project Management. Academy of Management Journal, 45 (3), pp. 546–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindblom, C. E., 1959. The Science of ‘Muddling Through’. Public Administration Review, Spring, 19 (2), pp. 79–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Simon, H. A., 1958. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G., 1988. Decisions and Organizations. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J. G. and Sevon, G., 1988. Gossip, Information and Decision-Making. In J. G. March, ed., Decisions and Organizations. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, M. L., 1983. Power, Politics, and Mis Implementation. Communications of the Acm, 26 (6), pp. 430–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N., 2006. Understanding Power in Project Settings. In D. Hodgson and S. Cicmil, eds., Making Projects Critical. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, N. and Rollinson, J., 2004. Maybe Bacon Had a Point: The Politics of Interpretation in Collective Sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 15 (S1), pp. S71–S86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, I., Badham, R. and Couchman, P., 2000. Rethinking Political Process in Technological Change: Socio-Technical Configurations and Frames. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 12 (1), pp. 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. H., 2003. Making Sense of Organizational Change. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., 1989. Mintzberg on Management: Inside our Strange World of Organizations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., Raisinghani, D. and Theoret, A., 1976. The Structure of ‘Unstructured’ Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21 (2), pp. 246–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J., 1990. Studying Deciding: An Exchange of Views Between Mintzberg and Waters, Pettigrew, and Butler. Organization Studies, 1 January, 11 (1), pp. 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. W. G., 2004. Science, Objective Knowlege, and the Theory of Project Management. In Bartlett Construction and Project Management Research Papers. London: University College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nandhakumar, J. and Avison, D., 1999. The Fiction of Methodological Development: A Field Study of Information Systems Development. Information Technology and People, 12 (2), pp. 176–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, P. C., 1984. Types of Organizational Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (3), pp. 414–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Leary, T. and Williams, T., 2011. Can Social Theory Help Project Delivery? In IRNOP X: The Expanding Domain of Project Research. London: Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Government Commerce, 2005. Managing Successful Projects with PRINCE2. TSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M., 1973. The Politics of Organizational Decision-making. London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H. and Meyer, A. D., 2002. On Uncertainty, Ambiguity and Complexity in Project Management. Management Science, 48, pp. 1008–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K., 2000. Understanding the Role of Politics in Successful Project Management. International Journal of Project Management, 18 (2), pp. 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto, J. K. and Slevin, D. P., 1987. Critical Factors in Successful Project Implementation. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34 (1), pp. 22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C. and Brown, A. D., 2005. Narrative, Organisations and Research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7 (3), pp. 167–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. L. and Senge, P. M., 1996. From Theory to Practice: Research Territory, Processes and Structure at an Organizational Learning Centre. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 9 (1), pp. 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouleau, L., 2005. Micro-Practices of Strategic Sensemaking and Sensegiving: How Middle Managers Interpret and Sell Change Every Day. Journal of Management Studies, 42 (7), pp. 1413–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauer, C., 1999. Deciding the Future for IS Failures: Not the Choice you might Think. In W. L. Currie and R. Galliers, eds, Rethinking Management Information Systems: An Interdisciplinary Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., 1993. On Dialogue, Culture, and Organizational Learning. Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, 22 (2), pp. 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H., 2004. Organizational Culture and Leadership. 3rd edn. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherr, A. L., 2005. Managing for Breakthroughs in Productivity, Human Resources Management 28 (3), pp. 403–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P. M., 1993. The Fifth Discipline: Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenhar, A. J., 2001. One Size does not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains. Management Science, 47 (3), pp. 394–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J., 1993. Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sillince, J. A. A., Harvey, C. and Harindranath, G., 2006. Conflicting Rhetorical Positions on Trust and Commitment: Talk-as-Action in IT Project Failure. In D. Hodgson and S. Cicmil, eds., Making Projects Critical. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., 1981. The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action. Academy of Management Review, 6 (4), pp. 577–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., 1988. The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process. The Sociological Quarterly, 29 (2), pp. 163–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A. L., 1993. Continual Permutations of Action. New York: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Agile Manifesto, 2001. http://www.agilemanifesto.org

  • Thomas, J., 1998. Making Sense of Project Management. In R. A. Lundin and F. Hartman, eds., Projects as Business Consituents and Guiding Motives. Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. and Mengel, T., 2008. Preparing Project Managers to Deal with Complexity–Advanced Project Management Education. International Journal of Project Management, 26 (3), pp. 304–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, R., Sargent, L. D. and Hardy, C., 2011. Managing Organizational Change: Negotiating Meaning and Power-Resistance Relations. Organization Science, 22 (1), pp. 22–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. R. and Cochrane, R. A., 1993. Goals-and-Methods Matrix: Coping with Projects with Ill-Defined Goals and/or Methods of Achieving them. International Journal of Project Management, 11 (2), pp. 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R., 2007. Gower Handbook of Project Management. Aldershot, UK: Gower Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, G., 1965. The Art of Judgment: A Study of Policy Making. London: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G., 1997. Actor-Network Theory and IS Research: Current Status and Future Prospects. In IFIP TC8 WG 8.2 International Conference on Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pp. 466–80. London, UK, and Philadelphia, US: Chapman & Hall, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., 1979. Social Psychology of Organising. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., 1995. Sensemaking in Organizations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D., 2005. Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16 (4), pp. 409–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, T., 2005. Assessing and Moving on From the Dominant Project Management Discourse in the Light of Project Overruns. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 52 (4), pp. 497–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, T. and Flores, F., 1987. Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, M., Smith, C., Morris, P. and Cicmil, S., 2006. Directions for Future Research in Project Management: The Main Findings of a UK Government-Funded Research Network. International Journal of Project Management, 24 (8), pp. 638–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zey, M., 1992. Decision Making: Alternatives to Rational Choice Models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Tim O’Leary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hull University Business School, UK

    Terry M. Williams

  2. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway

    Knut Samset

Copyright information

© 2012 Tim O’Leary

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

O’Leary, T. (2012). Decision-Making in Organisations. In: Williams, T.M., Samset, K. (eds) Project Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274618_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation