Abstract
The following remarks made by Palitha Kohona, Sri Lankan foreign secretary, when referring to China’s relationship with Sri Lanka provide a taste of existing perceptions of small Asian countries vis-à-vis their neighbours versus Western players:
The new donors are neighbours; they are rich; and they conduct themselves differently. Asians don’t go around teaching each other how to behave. There are ways we deal with each other — perhaps a quiet chat, but not wagging the finger.1
This chapter opens the third part of this book, which addresses regional approaches to external involvement in Asia. First, I start by providing some theoretical background on regionalism and regional hegemony to explain how this fits into the broader debate on external involvement addressed in the second chapter. Second, I deal with the contextual aspect linked to the Asian region, the current regional power shifts and their implications. The emphasis is on the growing material and normative power of a rising China and, to a lesser extent, India. The normative differences between Asian and Western countries are compounded by the rise in the material power of emerging Asian countries and the continuing decline of Western countries’ overall political influence in the global South. Fidler, Kim and Ganguly refer to ‘Eastphalia’, a new East-driven world order, and suggest that ‘material power may give Asian nations the space to engage in global politics not as long-suffering victims of imperialism but as global leaders with strong views on sovereignty, opposed to outside interference in their domestic governance and political affairs’.2
Chapter PDF
Notes
Fidler et al. define ‘Eastphalia’ as challenging ‘Western preferences for universal adoption of transnational principles, such as democracy, free market economics, and human rights’. David P. Fidler, S. W. Kim and S. Ganguly (2009) ‘Eastphalia Rising? Asian Influence and the Fate of Human Security’, Faculty Publications, Paper 114: 53, 56.
A. Acharya (2011b) ‘Norm Subsidiarity and Regional Orders: Sovereignty, Regionalism, and Rule Making in the Third World, International Studies Quarterly, 55: 97.
A. Hurrell (1995) ‘Regionalism in Theoretical Perspective’ in L. Fawcett and A. Hurrell (eds) Regionalism in World Politics: Regional Organization and International Order (Oxford University Press: New York), p. 39.
B. Hettne, A. Inotai and O. Sunkel (eds) (2000) National Perspectives on the New Regionalism in the South, Vol. 2 (Houndmills, Basingstoke: Macmillan Press Ltd), p. xviii.
P. J. Katzenstein (2005) A World of Regions: Asia and Europe in the American Imperium (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), p. 9.
J. A. Braveboy-Wagner (2009) Institutions of the Global South (Oxford: Routledge), pp. 215, 216.
Ayoob (2002b: 27–48), quoted in M. Ayoob (2010) ‘Making Sense of Global Tensions: Dominant and Subaltern Conceptions of Order and Justice in the International System’, International Studies, 47: 130.
A. Acharya (2006) ‘India and Southeast Asia in the Age of Terror: Building Partnerships for Peace’, Contemporary Southeast Asia, 28: 297–321.
D. Kang (2003) ‘Getting Asia Wrong: the Need for New Analytical Frameworks’, International Security, 4: 57–85.
A. Collins (2003) Security and Southeast Asia: Domestic, Regional and Global Issues (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner), p. 130
D. Da Cunha (1998) ‘Southeast Asian Perceptions of China’s Security Role in Its “Backyard”’ in D. Pollack and R. H. Yang (eds) In China’s Shadow: Regional Perspectives on Chinese Foreign Policy and Military Development (Santa Monica, CA: RAND).
See ‘Table 1.1. Selected Perspectives on Asian Regionalism’ in A. Acharya (2009) Whose Ideas Matter? Agency and Power in Asian Regionalism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), p. 2.
S. Seng Tang (2005) ‘NGOs in Conflict Management in Southeast Asia’ in M. Caballero-Anthony and A. Acharya (eds) UN Peace Operations and Asian Security (London: Routledge).
P. Duara (2009) The Global and Regional in China’s Nation-Formation (Oxford: Routledge), p. 191.
D. Lemke (2002) Regions of War and Peace (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 48.
P. Chattopadhyay (2011) ‘The Politics of India’s Neighbourhood Policy in South Asia’, South Asian Survey, 18 (1): 106.
See Kautilya (1992) The Arthashastra, edited, rearranged, translated and introduced by L. N. Rangarajan (India: Penguin Books), pp. 520–527.
A. Acharya (1992) ‘Regionalism and Regime Security in the Third World: Comparing the Origins of the ASEAN and the GCC’ in B. L. Job (ed.) The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States (London: Lynne Rienner), p. 149
A. Bohas (2006) ‘The Paradox of Anti-Americanism: Reflection on the Shallow Concept of Soft Power’, Global Society, 20 (4): 395–414
B. Buzan (1992) ‘Third World Regional Security in Structural and Historical Perspective’ in B. L. Job (ed.) The Insecurity Dilemma: National Security of Third World States (London: Lynne Rienner), p. 171
D. Nolte (2007) ‘How to Compare Regional Powers: Analytical Concepts and Research Topics’, preliminary paper presented at the ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, May 2007, Helsinki, Finland.
D. Ollapally and R. Rajagopalan (2011) ‘The Pragmatic Challenge to Indian Foreign Policy’, The Washington Quarterly, 34 (2): 145–162.
G. V. C. Naidu (2012) ‘India and Southeast Asia’, International Studies, 47 (2–4): 285–304.
A. Coates (2010) ‘Power, Complementarity and Reflexivity’ in E. J. Kirchner and J. Sperling (eds), National Security Cultures: Patterns of Global Governance (Oxford: Routledge).
Z. Yunling (2010) China and Asian Regionalism (New Jersey: World Scientific), p. 8.
It is difficult to talk about the government of China as a unified and coordinated entity considering the existing tensions between central state actors, their bureaucracies and competing agendas. For more, see B. Gill and J. Reilly (2007) ‘The Tenous Hold of China Inc. in Africa’, The Washington Quarterly, 30 (3): 37–52.
S. Zhao (2004) (ed.) Chinese Foreign Policy: Pragmatism and Strategic Behaviour (New York: East Gate Book), p. 17.
A. F. Cooper and T. Fues (2008) ‘Do the Asian Drivers Pull Their Diplomatic Weight? China, India and the United Nations’, World Development, 36 (2): 293–307.
J. Rathus (2011) Japan, China and Networked Regionalism in East Asia (Basington, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan), p. 33.
The trade volume between China and India accounts for more than USD 40 billion per annum. See I. Rehman (2009) ‘Keeping the Dragon at Bay: India’s Counter-Containment of China in Asia’, Asian Security, 5 (2): 115.
H. V. Pant (2009) ‘India in the Indian Ocean: Growing Mismatch between Ambitions and Capabilities’, Pacific Affairs, 82 (2): 281.
Ollapally and Rajagopalan (2011); D. M. Malone (2011) Does the Elephant Dance? Contemporary Indian Foreign Policy (New York: Oxford University Press), p. 123
G. Price (2011) ‘For the Global Good: India’s Developing International Role’, Chatham House Report, available at: www.chathamhouse.org/sites/default/files/public/Research/Asia/r—indiarole0511.pdf, date accessed 25 May 2011.
R. M. Basrur (2012) ‘Global Quest and Regional Reversal: Rising India and South Asia’, International Studies, 47 (2–4): 267–284.
Simpson defines legitimate great powers as ‘a powerful elite of states whose superior status is recognized by minor powers as a political fact giving rise to the existence of certain constitutional privileges, rights and duties and whose relations with each other are defined by adherence to a rough principle of sovereign equality’. Simpson (2004), quoted in S. Suzuki (2008) ‘Seeking “Legitimate” Great Power Status in Post-Cold War International Society: China’s and Japan’s Participation in UNPKO’, International Relations, 22 (1): 47.
A. Scobell (2010) ‘China’s Rise: How Peaceful?’ in S. Ganguly, A. Scobell and J. Liow (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Asian Security Studies (Oxford: Routledge), p. 14.
D. Shambaugh and G. Wacker (2008) (eds) ‘American and European Relations with China: Advancing Common Agendas’, SWP Research Paper, Berlin: German Institute for International and Security Affairs.
G. Price (2005), ‘Diversity in Donorship. The Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid: India’s Official Aid Programme’, HPG Background Paper, London: Overseas Development Institute, available at: www.odi.org.uk/resources/download/302.pdf, date accessed 15 March 2013.
N. Woods (2008) ‘Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance’, International Affairs, 84 (6): 1205–1221.
S. Dutta (2011) ‘Managing and Engaging Rising China: India’s Evolving Posture’, The Washington Quarterly, 34 (2): 127–144.
See title of the book by T. Myint-U (2011) Where China Meets India: Burma and the New Crossroads of Asia (London: Faber and Faber).
Copyright information
© 2014 Amaia Sánchez-Cacicedo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sánchez-Cacicedo, A. (2014). Power Shifts in Asia: External Involvement in Intra-State Conflicts. In: Building States, Building Peace. Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274168_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137274168_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44553-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27416-8
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)