Skip to main content

The Nonprofits as Social Assets and Agents of Public Policy

  • Chapter
Players in the Public Policy Process
  • 158 Accesses

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to lay out foundation concepts that are critical to our discussion and to the principal-agent paradigm as it applies to the theme: the nonprofit as a social capital asset and an agent of public policy. These concepts include (a) the nonprofit as a social capital asset and an agent of the public; (b) social capital—not a review of the literature on this subject, but precisely how it fits into our paradigm; (c) the substitution of nonprofits for governments as agents of public policy; and (d) the distinction between two types of agency relationships that a nonprofit may have when functioning as an agent of public policy—if it is under contract and if it is not. In the next chapter we see how these concepts fit into an application of the principal-agent paradigm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Alejandro Portes, “Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 24, No.1, 1998, pp. 12–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tom Schuller, Stephen Baron, and John Field, “A Review and Critique,” in Stephen Baron, John Field, and Tom Schuller, eds., Social Capital: Critical Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kenneth Arrow, “Observations on Social Capital,” in P. Dasgupta and I. Seraglio, eds., Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2000), pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Solow, “Notes on Social Capital and Economic Performance,” in P. Dasgupta and I. Seraglio, eds., Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2000), pp. 6–10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle, “Introduction: Generating Social Capital,” in Marc Hooghe and Dietlind Stolle, eds., Generating Social Capital: Civil Society and the Institutions in Comparative Perspective (New York: Palgrave MacMillian, 2003), pp. 1–18. Schuller, Baron, and Field, “A Review and Critique.”

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Edward J. Glaser, David Laibson, and Bruce Sacerdote, “An Economic Approach to Social Capital,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 112, No. 783, Nov. 2002, pp. 437–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert Putnam, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community (New York: Simon Schuster, 2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Herrington J. Bryce, Financial and Strategic Management for Nonrprofit Organizations , 3rd ed. (San Diego: Jossey Bass, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Vincent Buskens, “The Social Structure of Trust,” Social Networks, Vol. 20, No. 3, July 1998, pp. 265–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oliver E. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, A Study of the Economics of Internal Organization (New York: Free Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Oliver E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting (New York: Free Press, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Oliver E. Williamson,. “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 36, 1991, pp. 269–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rachel E. Kranton and Deborah F. Minehart, “A Theory of Buyer-Seller Networks,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 3, June 2001, pp. 485–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Matthew O. Jackson and Asher Wolinsky, “A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks,” Journal of Economic Theory, Vol. 71, No. 1, October 1996, pp. 44–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul DiMaggio and Hugh Louch, “Socially Embedded Consumer Transaction,” American Sociological Review, Vol. 63, 1998, pp. 619–637.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Joel Polodny, “Networks as Pipes and Prisms of the Market,” The American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 107, No. 1, July 2001, pp. 33–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Joel M. Polodny, “A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Symbols: A Sociologist’s View of the Economic Pursuit of Truth,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 93, No. 2, May 2003, pp. 169–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Karen S. Cook and Joseph. M. Whitmeyer, “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Network Theory and Exchange Analysis,” Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 18, 1992, 109–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Putnam, Bowling Alone, esp. p. 19. Lewis M. Feldstein with Don Cohen, Better Together: Restoring the American Community (New York. Simon and Schuster, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  20. James Coleman, Foundations of Social Theory (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frances Fukiyama, “Social Capital and Development, the Coming Agenda,” SAIS REVIEW, Vol 22, No. 1, winter-spring 2002, pp. 23–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Clarence N. Stone, “Civic Capacity and Urban Education,” Urban Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 5, May 2001, pp. 595–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. and Clarence Stone, Jeffrey R. Henig, Bryan D. Jones, and Carol Pierannunzi, Building Civic Capacity: The Politics of Reforming Urban Schools (Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Byrne and D. Nelson, “Attraction as a Linear Function of Proportion of Positive Reinforcements,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 4, 1965, pp. 240–243.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Elinor Ostrom, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1990).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Marc Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 78, 1973, pp. 1360–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walter Powell and Laurel Smith-Doerr, “Networks and Economic Life,” in Neil Smelser and Richard Swedberg, eds., The Handbook of Economic Sociology (Princeton, NJ:. Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation, 1994), pp. 369–402.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, “Social Capital and Community Governance,” The Economic Journal, Vol. 112, No. 483, November 21, 2002, pp. 419–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Herrington J. Bryce, Financial and Strategic Management of Non profit Organizations, 2d ed. (Upper Saddle, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992), p. 127–128.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Anidrudh Krishna, Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press 2002), pp. 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Richard A. Couto, and Catherine Guthrie, Making Democracy Work Better: Mediating Structures, Social Capital and the Democratic Process (Chapel Hill, N.C.: University of North Carolina Press, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Elenaor Brown and James Ferris, Social Capital in Los Angeles: Findings from the Social Capital Community Benchmark Survey (Los Angeles, CA: The Center on Philanthropy and Public Policy, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  33. Christiaan Grootaert and Thierry van Bastelaer, eds., Understanding and Measuring Social Capital: A Multidisciplinary Tool for Practitioners (Washington, D.C.: The World Bank, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rory McVeigh and Chistian Smith, “Who Protests in America: An Analysis of Three Political Alternatives-Inaction, Institutionalized Politics, or Protest,” Sociological Forum, Vol. 14, No. 4, December 1999, pp. 685–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. J. E. Williams, “Linking Beliefs to Collective Action: Politicized Religious Beliefs and the Civil Rights Movement,” Sociological Form, Vol. 17, No. 2, July 2002, pp. 203–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sheila Suess Kennedy and Wolfgang Bielefeld, Charitable Choice Results from Three States ( Indianapolis, IN: Center for Urban Policy and Environment, Indiana University-Purdue University, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  37. Colin J. Baier and Bradley R. E. Wright, “If You Love Me, Keep My Commandments: A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Religion on Crime,” Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Vol. 38, No. 1, February 2001, pp. 3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Mathew R. Lee and John P. Bartkowski, “Civic Participation, Regional Subcultures, and Violence: The Differential Effects of Secular and Religious Participation on Adult and Juvenile Homicide,” Homicide Studies, Vol. 8, No. 1, February 2004, pp. 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Norma D. Turner, Kristi H. O’Dell, and Gayle. W. Weaver, “Religion and the Recovery of Addicted Women,” Journal of Religion and Health, Vol. 38, No. 2, 1999, pp. 132–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Christian Research Association, Social Capital and Religion in Contemporary Australia (Melbourne, Australia: Christian Research Association, July 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Russell Hardin, Collective Action (Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  42. Christopher McMahon, Collective Rationality and Collective Reasoning (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge, University Press, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Fikret Berkes, “Cross-Scale Institutional Linkages: Perspectives from the Bottom Up,” in Elinor Ostom et al., eds., The Drama of the Commons (Washington, D.C.: National Research Council, 2001), pp. 293–321.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Astrid E. Merget, “Equity in the Distribution of Municipal Services,” in Herrington J. Bryce, ed., Revitalizing Cities (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1979), pp. 161–191.

    Google Scholar 

  45. John D. Donahue, The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means (New York: Basic Books, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  46. Klaus Schmidt, “The Cost and Benefits of Privatization,” Journal of Law and Economic Organization, Vol. 12, No.1, 1996, pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Walter E. Oates, Fiscal Federalism (New York: Harcourt Brace, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  48. Susan A. Ostrander, “Elite Domination in Private Social Agencies: How It Happens and How It Is Challenged,” in G. William Domhoff and Thomas R. Dye, eds., Power Elites and Organizations (Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, 1987), pp. 85–102

    Google Scholar 

  49. and Susan A. Ostrander, “Voluntary Social Service Agencies in the United States,” Social Service Review, Vol. 59, No. 3, 1985, pp. 435–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Luiz R De Mello Jr., “Can Fiscal Decentralization Strengthen Social Capital,” Public Finance Review, Vol. 32, No. 1, January 2004, pp. 4–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Michale Woodcock, “Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis and Policy Framework,” Theory and Society, Vol. 27, 1998, pp. 151–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Herrington J. Bryce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryce, H.J. (2012). The Nonprofits as Social Assets and Agents of Public Policy. In: Players in the Public Policy Process. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273925_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics