Skip to main content

The Significance of the Principal-Agent Paradigm

  • Chapter
Players in the Public Policy Process
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Citizens voluntarily form nonprofit or nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) for the expressed purposes of advancing public and community welfare. These organizations are rapidly growing and becoming a significant part of modern societies everywhere. They are blossoming throughout the world and dependence on them is increasing by citizens, governments, and by international organizations such as the World Bank and the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)—both of which have commissioned expert manuscripts on the roles that NGOs as well as social capital may play in increasing the effectiveness of their programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The Internal Revenue Service, Annual Report of Commissioner and Chief Consul (Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, various years up to 1989) and the United States Revenue Service, Databook, 1997) p. 23.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joel Sobel, “Can We Trust Social Capital,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. 41, 2002, pp. 139–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Charles E. Lindblom, “The Science of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 19, No. 2, spring 1959, pp. 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert A. Dahl and Charles E. Lindblom, Politics, Economics and Welfare (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Amittai Etzioni, “Mixed Scanning: A Third Approach in Decision-Making,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 27, 1967, pp. 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. James Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It (New York: Basic Books, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  7. John Forester, “Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling Through,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 44, 1984, pp. 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Harold Laswell, Politics: Who Gets What, When and How (New York: McGraw-Hill, Meridian Books, 1936).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenneth Arrow, “Observations on Social Capital,” in Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldi, eds., Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2000), pp. 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robert Solow, “Notes on Social Capital and Economic Performance,” in Partha Dasgupta and Ismail Serageldi, eds., Social Capital: A Multifaceted Perspective (Washington, D.C: World Bank, 2000), pp. 6–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Herrington J. Bryce

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bryce, H.J. (2012). The Significance of the Principal-Agent Paradigm. In: Players in the Public Policy Process. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273925_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics