Skip to main content

Conditioned Higher-Moment Portfolio: Optimization Using Optimal Control

  • Chapter
Book cover Understanding Investment Funds
  • 403 Accesses

Abstract

The present chapter contributes to two strains of portfolio optimization literature. The first is conditioned portfolio optimization, which discusses the mathematically correct treatment of information external to the investment assets themselves within what is otherwise a classical portfolio optimization context. The second is portfolio optimization involving higher moments of returns, which attempts to optimize for expected levels of portfolio returns moments beyond mean and variance. The optimal control formulation of conditioned portfolio problems introduced in Boissaux and Schiltz (2010) allows for generic numerical solution methods to be applied in the context of conditioned optimization if single signal series are used, and was applied to obtain constrained-weight solutions to the basic conditioned mean-variance problem in Boissaux and Schiltz (2011). In this chapter, the approach is applied to the higher-moment problem context. We formulate and backtest two constrained-weight higher-moment problem variants which avoid non-convex objective functions. In both cases, the use of conditioning information significantly improves observed strategy performance with respect to all metrics optimized by each problem formulation. We also briefly discuss and give results for the full four-moment problem using quartic polynomial utility functions, and find that results provide evidence that the full problem can be worked in practice even though its potentially non-convex objective function may cause numerical issues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Athayde G. and R. Flores (2001), “Finding a maximum skewness portfolio”, Computing in Economics and Finance, Society for Computational Economics, April 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athayde G. and R. Flores (2001), “Incorporating skewness and kurtosis in portfolio optimization: a multidimensional efficient set”, In Advances in Portfolio Construction and Implementation, pages 243–257. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, EUA, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu D., Hung C-H., Oomen R. C. and A. Stremme (2006), “When to Pick the Losers: Do Sentiment Indicators Improve Dynamic Asset Allocation?”, SSRN eLibrary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basu D., Oomen R. C. and A. Stremme (2006), “Exploiting the Informational Content of the Linkages between Spot and Derivatives Markets?, Warwick Business School Working Paper Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts J. T. (2001), “Practical methods for optimal control and estimation using nonlinear programming”, volume 19 of Advances in Design and Control, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, first edition. ISBN 0–89871–488–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissaux M. and J. Schiltz (2010), “An optimal control approach to portfolio optimization with conditioning information”, Luxembourg School of Finance Working Paper 10–09, Luxembourg School of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boissaux M. and J. Schiltz (2011), “Practical weight-constrained conditioned portfolio optimization using risk aversion indicator signals”, Luxembourg School of Finance Working Paper 11–12, Luxembourg School of Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd R. H., Hribar M. E. and J. Nocedal (1999), “An interior point algorithm for large-scale nonlinear programming”, SIAMJ. Optim., 9(4):877–900. ISSN 1052–6234. Dedicated to John E. Dennis, Jr., on his 60th birthday.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang I-H. E. (2008), “Modern Portfolio Management with Conditioning Information”. SSRN eLibrary.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies R. J., Kat H. M. and S. Lu (2003), “Fund of hedge funds portfolio selection: A multiple-objective approach”, City University Working Paper, City University London.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi E. (2002), “A note on portfolio selection under various risk measures”, IEW — Working Papers iewwp122, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics — University of Zurich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W. E. and A. F. Siegel (2001), “The efficient use of conditioning information in portfolios”, The Journal of Finance, 56(3):967–982, ISSN 00221082.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen L. P. and S. F. Richard (1987), “The role of conditioning information in deducing testable restrictions implied by dynamic asset pricing models”, Econometrica, 55(3):587–613. ISSN 0012–9682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jondeau E. and M. Rockinger (2006), “Optimal portfolio allocation under higher moments”, European Financial Management, 12(1):29–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jurczenko E. and B. Maillet (2006), “Theoretical foundations of asset allocations and pricing models with higher-order moments”, In Multi-moment Asset Allocation and Pricing Models, pages 1–36. John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall M. G. (1945), The Advanced Theory of Statistics, Volume I, 2nd ed. Charles Griffin & Company Limited, 42 Drury Lane, London, W.C.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M. S. (1990), “Precautionary saving in the small and in the large”, Econometrica, January, 58(1): 53–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimball M. S. (1991), “Precautionary motives for holding assets”, Working Paper 3586, National Bureau of Economic Research, January 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai K. K., Yu L. and Wang S (2006), “Mean-variance-skewness-kurtosis-based portfolio optimization”, Computer and Computational Sciences, International MultiSymposiums on, 2:292–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai T-Y (1991), “Portfolio selection with skewness: a multiple-objective approach”, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1:293–305. ISSN 0924–865X.10.1007/BF02408382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo J., Saks P., and S. Satchell (2009), “Implementing risk appetite in the management of currency portfolios”, Journal of Asset Management, 9:380–397(18).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller S. M. and M. Machina (1987), “Moment preferences and polynomial utility”, Economics Letters, 23(4):349–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pézier J. and A. White (2006), “The relative merits of investable hedge fund indices and of funds of hedge funds in optimal passive portfolios”, ICMA Centre Discussion Papers in Finance icma-dp2006–10, Henley Business School, Reading University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rama Cont (2001), “Empirical properties of asset returns: stylized facts and statistical issues. Quantitative Finance, 1:223–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R. T. and S. Uryasev (2000), “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk”, Journal of Risk, 2:21–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey J. (2008), “Multi-dimensional risk and mean-kurtosis portfolio optimization”, Journal of Financial Management and Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 2, December.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Neumann J. and O. Morgenstern (1953), Theory of Games and Economic Behavior, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., third edition. ISBN 0–691–00362–9. 129–160

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Marc Boissaux and Jang Schiltz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Boissaux, M., Schiltz, J. (2013). Conditioned Higher-Moment Portfolio: Optimization Using Optimal Control. In: Terraza, V., Razafitombo, H. (eds) Understanding Investment Funds. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137273611_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics