Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

NATO-Russia Relations

  • Chapter
NATO’s Post-Cold War Trajectory

Part of the book series: New Security Challenges Series ((NSECH))

  • 466 Accesses

Abstract

Since the early 1990s, two key issues have dominated efforts to develop a stable and predictable relationship between NATO and Russia. The first has been the persistent Russian demand for some kind of ‘special’ institutional relationship with the Alliance, one that is demonstrably distinct from — and closer than — that enjoyed by any other non-member state. The second issue has been NATO enlargement, particularly as it has encroached upon Russia’s self-ascribed ‘near abroad’.1 More recently, other important issues have risen up the agenda, including missile defence, the stalled ratification of the amended CFE treaty, and NATO’s actual and potential roles in the Caucasus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. For a detailed analysis, see M. A. Smith, Russia and NATO since 1991: From Cold War through Cold Peace to Partnership? (Abingdon: Routledge, 2006).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Segodnya, 14 September 1993. Translated in The Current Digest of the Post-Soviet Press [hereafter CDPSP], Vol. XLV(37), 1993, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  3. ‘Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s Letter to US President Bill Clinton’, SIPRI Yearbook 1994 (Oxford: SIPRI/Oxford University Press, 1994), pp. 249–50.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Remarks by the President in Live Telecast to Russian People (Washington, DC: White House Office of the Press Secretary, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Z. Brzezinski, ‘The Premature Partnership’, Foreign Affairs, 73(2), 1994, p. 70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J. Morrison, ‘Yalta II or Realpolitik?’ The Washington Times, 6 September 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Izvestia, 28 September 1994. CDPSP, Vol. XLVI(39), 1994, pp. 25–6. For commentary see Segodnya, 30 September 1994. CDPSP, Vol. XLVI(39), 1994, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. J. Bone, ‘US and Russia Carve Out “Spheres of Influence”’, The Times, 27 September 1994; Krasnaya Zvezda, 1 October 1994. CDPSP, Vol. XLVI(40), 1994, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  9. B. Clark and V. Marsh, ‘Yeltsin Denounces NATO Plans to Expand Eastwards’, Financial Times, 6 December 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  10. N. Afanasievskii, ‘On the NATO-Russia Founding Act’, International Affairs (Moscow), Vol. 43(4), 1997, p. 159ff.

    Google Scholar 

  11. On this see S. Talbott, The Russia Hand: A Memoir of Presidential Diplomacy (New York: Random House, 2002), Chapter 9;

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Goldgeier and M. McFaul, Power and Purpose: US Policy toward Russia after the Cold War (Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2003), p. 203; ‘A New European Order’, The Economist, 17 May 1997, p. 43.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between NATO and the Russian Federation (Brussels: NATO, 1997), at fndact-a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  14. This phrase was attributed to the then German Foreign Minister Klaus Kinkel. See ‘Wooing a Bear’, The Economist, 14 December 1996, p. 47. At the time there were 16 NATO member states.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Smith, Russia and NATO since 1991, p. 66.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Founding Act, Part II.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Izvestia, 28 May 1997. CDPSP, Vol. XLIX(21), 1997, p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 27 May 1997. CDPSP, Vol. XLIX(22), 1997, pp. 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Quoted in Russia and European Security (Document A/1722) (Paris: Assembly of the Western European Union, 2000), at http://www.assembly-weu.org/en/documents/sessions_ordinaires/rpt/2000/1722.html. See also Segodnya, 16 May 1997. CDPSP, Vol. XLIX(20), 1997, pp. 2–4.

  20. ‘Testimony of Hon. Henry Kissinger’, The Debate on NATO Enlargement (Washington, DC: Committee on Foreign Relations United States Senate, 1997), at http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/. See also K-H. Kamp, ‘The NATO-Russia Founding Act: Trojan Horse or Milestone of Reconciliation?’ Aussenpolitik, Vol. 48(4), 1997, pp. 320–1.

    Google Scholar 

  21. ‘Ambassador Pickering Response to Question from Senator Hagel’, The Debate on NATO Enlargement.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kamp, ‘The NATO-Russia Founding Act’, p. 324.

    Google Scholar 

  23. See NATO-Russia Relations and Next Steps for NATO Enlargement (Document AS277PCED-E) (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 1999), at http://www.nato-pa.int/publications/comrep/1999/as277pced-e.html.

  24. Col. Gen. L. Ivashov, ‘Russia-NATO: Matters of Cooperation’, International Affairs (Moscow), Vol. 44(6), 1998, p. 113.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Segodnya, 10 December 1998. CDPSP, Vol. L(49), 1998, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. See inter alia, K-P. Klaiber, ‘The NATO-Russia relationship a year after Paris’, NATO Review, Vol. 46(3), 1998, pp.16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Rossiiskaya Gazeta, 26 March 1999. CDPSP, Vol. LI(12), 1998 [sic], pp. 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Independent International Commission on Kosovo, Kosovo Report (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), p. 161.

    Google Scholar 

  29. P. Trenin-Straussov, The NATO-Russia Permanent Joint Council in 1997–1999: Anatomy of a Failure (Berlin: Berlin Information Center for Transatlantic Security, 1999), at http://www.bits.de/public/researchnote/rn99-1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  30. WEU Assembly, Russia and European Security (Document A/1722) (Paris: Assembly of the Western European Union, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  31. A. M. Brudenell, ‘Russia’s Role in the Kosovo Conflict of 1999’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 153(1), 2008, pp. 30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vremya MN, 5 July 1999. CDPSP, Vol. LI(27), 1999, p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ivanov: Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 12 October 1999. CDPSP, Vol. LI(41), 1999, p. 3; Primakov: E. MacAskill, ‘NATO and Russia Re-establish Ties as Tensions Ease’, The Guardian, 17 February 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  34. WEU Assembly, Russia and European Security. See also Kommersant, 24 July 1999. CDPSP, LI(30), 1999, p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Joint Statement on the Occasion of the Visit of the Secretary General of NATO, Lord Robertson, in Moscow on 16 February 2000 (Brussels: NATO, 2000), at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2000/p000216e.htm.

  36. Quoted in MacAskill, ‘NATO and Russia Re-establish Ties as Tensions Ease’.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Statement by Lord Robertson, NATO Secretary General, on Acting President Putin’s Interview with the BBC (Document (2000) 02) (Brussels: NATO, 2000), at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2000/p00-023e.htm.

  38. Quoted in G. Whittell, ‘Putin Uses Frost to Begin Thaw with West’, The Times, 6 March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Quoted in C. Bremner, ‘Russia and West to Work More Closely on Security’, The Times, 4 October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  40. By 2001 NATO’s membership had grown to 19 states.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noviye Izvestia, 20 November 2001. CDPSP, Vol. LIII(47), 2001, pp. 20–1; M. Evans, ‘Blair Plans Wider Role for Russia with NATO’, The Times, 17 November 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Press Conference with NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson, 22 November 2001 (Brussels: NATO, 2001), at .

    Google Scholar 

  43. The Reykjavik communiqué simply stated that the new council would be created and in it ‘NATO member states and Russia will work as equal partners in areas of common interest, while preserving NATO’s prerogative to act independently’. See M-NAC-1(2002)59 (Brussels: NATO, 2002), at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2002/p02–059e.htm.

  44. I. Straus, ‘The New NATO-Russia Council in Context: One Step in a Series, Many More to Come’, Johnson’s Russia List [hereafter JRL], 6276, at http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/6276–9.cfm. See also Noviye Izvestia, 16 May 2002. CDPSP, LIV(20), 2002, p. 5; Trud, 30 May 2002. CDPSP, Vol. LIV(22), 2002, p. 4.

  45. For differing views on what NATO members had agreed on this score, see M. Evans, ‘Russia to Move into NATO HQ’, The Times, 15 May 2002; and J. Dempsey and R. Wolffe, ‘In from the Cold’, Financial Times, 15 May 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Quoted in K. Knox, ‘NATO: Alliance Mulls Details of Larger Role for Russia’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty [hereafter RFE/RL], at http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1098934.html.

  47. H. Adomeit and F. Kupferschmidt, Russia-NATO Relations: Stagnation or Revitalization? (Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, 2008), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 26 September 2002. CDPSP, Vol. LIV(39), 2002, p. 16; Vremya Novostei, 21 November 2002. CDPSP, Vol. LIV(47), 2002, pp. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  49. See the text of Robertson’s speech, A New Russian Revolution: Partnership with NATO (Brussels: NATO, 2002), at http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2002/s021213a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Press Conference by NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson Following the Meeting of the NATO-Russia Council (Brussels: NATO, 2003), at http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2003/s030513a.htm.

  51. M. Laruelle, ‘Russia’s Strategies in Afghanistan and their Consequences for NATO’, NATO Defence College Research Paper No. 69, November 2011, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  52. D. Trenin, ‘Russia Leaves the West’, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 85(4), 2006, p. 90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Adomeit and Kupferschmidt, Russia-NATO Relations, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  54. ‘Russian Ship Barred from NATO Anti-terror Patrol’, RFE/RL, at http://www.rferl.org/articleprintview/1190977.html.

  55. Istanbul Summit Communiqué, para. 31 (Brussels: NATO, 2004), at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2004/p04–096e.htm.

  56. For details see inter alia, Adomeit and Kupferschmidt, Russia-NATO Relations, pp. 10–14; P. Fitch, ‘Building Hope on Experience’, NATO Review 3, 2003, at ; S. Blank, The NATO-Russia Partnership: A Marriage of Convenience or a Troubled Relationship? (Carlisle PA: US Army War College Strategic Studies Institute, 2006), pp. 46–53;

    Google Scholar 

  57. P. Williams, ‘NATO-Russia Military Co-operation: From Dialogue to Interoperability?’ RUSI Journal, Vol. 150(5), 2005, pp. 44–7; Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 15 September 2005. CDPSP, Vol. LVII(37), 2005, p. 13; NATO’s Developing Partnerships (Document 165PCNP08E) (Brussels: NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 2008), p. 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. This is the major theme of Adomeit and Kupferschmidt, Russia-NATO Relations. See also J. Edwards and J. Kemp (directors), Russia’s Wrong Direction: What the United States Can and Should Do (New York: Council on Foreign Relations, 2006), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  59. J. Sherr, Culpabilities and Consequences (London: Chatham House, 2008), p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  60. NATO in the 21st Century: Speech by NATO Secretary General, Lord Robertson at the Charles University in Prague (Brussels: NATO, 2002), at http://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2002/s020321a.htm.

  61. S. Sestanovich, ‘What Has Moscow Done?’ Foreign Affairs, 87(6), 2008, pp. 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Russia’s Wrong Direction, p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Russia’s Wrong Direction, p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  64. See inter alia, Kommersant, 20 August 2008. CDPSP, Vol. LX(33), 2008, p. 2; Nezavisimaya Gazeta, 26 August 2008. CDPSP, Vol. LX(34), 2008, p. 1; ‘Medvedev Says Russia Ready to Cut Ties with NATO’, JRL, 2008–157, at http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008-157-7.cfm.

  65. ‘Russia-NATO Logistics Cooperation Being Put on Hold — Rogozin’, JRL, 2008–158, at http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008–157-7.htm.

  66. Final Communiqué (Document (2008) 153), para. 25 (Brussels: NATO, 2008), at http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008–158-15.htm.

  67. Final Communiqué (Document (2008) 153), para. 25 (Brussels: NATO, 2008), at http://www.cdi.org/russia/johnson/2008-158-15.htm.

  68. Strasbourg/Kehl Summit Declaration (Brussels: NATO, 2009), at http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/news_52837.htm.

  69. Russian Ambassador to NATO, Dmitri Rogozin, cited in Associated Press, ‘Libya Marks Strategic Shift for NATO: Russia’, 3 September 2011 at http://www.dawn.com/2011/09/03/libya-marks-strategic-shift-for-nato-russia.html.

  70. Rogozin, cited in R. Knops (rapporteur), ‘Missile Defence: The Way Ahead for NATO’, NATO Parliamentary Assembly, Sub-Committee on Future Security and Defence Capabilities, 8 September 2011, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Cited in Knops (rapporteur), ‘Missile Defence: The Way Ahead for NATO’, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  72. For a more detailed analysis of developments during this period, see Smith, Russia and NATO since 1991, Chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  73. The major NATO decisions during OAF were made by the so-called Quint. This informal grouping consisted of the US, UK, Germany, France and Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  74. On the importance of Russia’s role, see P. Latawski and M. A. Smith, The Kosovo Crisis and the Evolution of Post-Cold War European Security (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2003), pp. 97–103;

    Google Scholar 

  75. A. M. Brudenell, ‘Russia’s Role in the Kosovo Conflict of 1999’, RUSI Journal, 153(1), 2008, pp. 30–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. The British commander of NATO ground forces at the time — Lieutenant General Sir Mike Jackson — reportedly told Clark that confronting the Russians at Pristina airport would threaten to ‘start World War III’. For Clark’s account of this incident, see Gen. W. Clark, Waging Modern War (Oxford: Public Affairs, 2001), Chapter 15. Jackson subsequently sought to downplay its significance, describing the Russian action as ‘a little sideplay’.

    Google Scholar 

  77. See Lt. Gen. Sir M. Jackson, ‘KFOR: The Inside Story’, RUSI Journal, Vol. 145(1), 2000, p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  78. NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement. Analysis and Recommendations of the Group of Experts on a New Strategic Concept for NATO (Brussels: NATO, 2010), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  79. NATO 2020: Assured Security; Dynamic Engagement, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  80. See D. Yost, ‘NATO’s Evolving Purposes and the Next Strategic Concept’, International Affairs, Vol. 86(2), 2010, p. 501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. See Latawski and Smith, The Kosovo Crisis and the Evolution of Post-Cold War European Security, p. 99ff.

    Google Scholar 

  82. Istanbul Summit Declaration (Press Release 2004 096) para. 3, at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2004/p04–096e.htm.

  83. Bucharest Summit Declaration (Press Release 2008 049), para. 23, at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-049e.html.

  84. Quoted in ‘NATO: No MAP for Georgia or Ukraine, but Alliance Vows Membership’, Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, 3 April 2008, at http://www.rferl.org/articleprintview/1079726.html.

  85. ‘NATO: Czech FM Explains the Georgia, Ukraine Compromise’, Radio Free Europe/ Radio Liberty, 4 April 2008, at http://www.rferl.org/content/article/1079737.html.

  86. These were the status of Kosovo, the future of the CFE treaty, missile defence and NATO enlargement.

    Google Scholar 

  87. Meeting of the NATO-Russia Council at the level of Heads of State and Government held in Bucharest (Brussels: NATO, 2008), at http://www.nato.int/docu/pr/2008/p08-050e.html.

  88. D. Yost, ‘The US Debate on NATO Nuclear Deterrence’, International Affairs, Vol. 87(6), 2011, pp. 1416–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. M. Webber, Inclusion, Exclusion and the Governance of European Security (Manchester etc.: Manchester University Press, 2007), pp. 16–18.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  90. This definition of identity change is derived from M. Finnemore, National Interests and International Society (Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press, 1996), pp. 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  91. I. B. Neumann and V. Pouliot, ‘Untimely Russia: Hysteresis in Russian-Western Relations over the Past Millennium’, Security Studies, Vol. 20(1), 2011, pp. 105–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. V. Pouliot, International Security in Practice: The Politics of NATO-Russia Diplomacy (Cambridge etc.: Cambridge University Press, 2010), p. 2.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  93. President Boris Yeltsin, speech to the Russian Supreme Soviet, February 1992, cited in M. Webber, ‘The Emergence of the Foreign Policy of the Russian Federation’, Communist and Post-Communist Studies, Vol. 26(3), 1993, p. 262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. R. Sakwa, ‘Russia and Europe: Whose Society?’ Journal of European Integration, Vol. 33(2), 2011, p. 197–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Perceptions of Russia: A Survey among European and American Elites (Berlin: The Aspen Institute, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  96. D. Averre, ‘From Pristina to Tskhinvali: The Legacy of Operation Allied Force in Russia’s Relations with the West’, International Affairs, Vol. 85(3), 2009, p. 591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. ‘Joint Statement at NATO-Russia Council Meeting’, Lisbon, 20 November 2010 at http://www.america.gov/st/texttransenglish/2010/November/20101120161455su0.8716787.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Government and Society, University of Birmingham, UK

    Mark Webber (Professor of International Politics)

  2. University of Akron, USA

    James Sperling (Professor of Political Science)

  3. Defence and International Affairs, Royal Military Academy, Sandhurst, UK

    Martin A. Smith (Senior Lecturer)

Authors
  1. Mark Webber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James Sperling
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin A. Smith
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2012 Mark Webber, James Sperling and Martin A. Smith

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Webber, M., Sperling, J., Smith, M.A. (2012). NATO-Russia Relations. In: NATO’s Post-Cold War Trajectory. New Security Challenges Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271617_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation