Abstract
Our discussion has repeatedly stated that the post-Soviet area is extremely heterogeneous in terms of its economic and political development. Moreover, it comprises large countries — Russia, Kazakhstan, Ukraine and Uzbekistan — with very significant internal differences. So even territories within individual states are dependent to differing degrees on their links with the FSU. During the 2000s, for example, the proportion of their total foreign trade which individual regions of Russia transacted with the FSU varied from almost nothing (Chukotka) to more than 60 per cent (Altai). Given these variations, sub-national governments are likely to have different preferences regarding post-Soviet regional integration (both regionalism and regionalization).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Alexander Libman and Evgeny Vinokurov
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Libman, A., Vinokurov, E. (2012). Sub-National Actors in Post-Soviet Integration. In: Holding-Together Regionalism: Twenty Years of Post-Soviet Integration. Euro-Asian Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271136_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137271136_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-33774-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27113-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)