Skip to main content

Institutionalized Voice in Latin American Democracies

  • Chapter

Abstract

Latin America has made progress toward more open and democratic political systems over the last three decades, but the quality and performance of democratic institutions remain uneven (O’Donnell et al., 2003; Dagnino et al., 2006; Organización de Estados Americanos, Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Desarrollo, 2010). In one respect, however, Latin America is emerging as a pioneer: there has been an explosion in democratic participation. Citizens have begun to demand more say in the decisions that affect them directly. One consequence has been a wide range of participatory innovations designed to reinforce the option of “voice” (as opposed to “loyalty” or “exit,” in Hirschman’s [1970] argot).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • Ackerman, Bruce (1988). “Neo-federalism?” in Elster and Slagstad, eds. Constitutionalism and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, David. (2010). “Plebiscitos, referendos e iniciativas populares en América Latina: ¿mecanismos de control politico o políticamente controlados?” Perfiles Latinoamericanos (No. 35, January-June). FLACSO-México.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, David and Juan Pablo Luna (2010). “Chile ¿Institucionalización con pies de barro? In Cameron and Luna, eds. Democracia en la region andina: Diversidad y desafíos. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, Leonardo. (2009). Participatory Institutions in Democratic Brazil. Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avrtizer, Leonardo. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arditi, Benjamin. (2008). “Arguments About the Left Turns in Latin America: A Post-Liberal Politics?” Latin American Research Review, 43 (3): 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, Maxwell A. and Juan Pablo Luna, eds. (2010). Democracia en la region andina: Diversidad y desafíos. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrión, Julio, F. ed. (2006) The Fujimori Legacy: The Rise of Electoral Authoritarianism in Peru. University Park, Pennsylvania: The Penn State University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppedge, Michael and John Gerring et al. (2011). “Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New Approach,” Perspectives on Politics, 9 (2): 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnino, Evelina, Alberto J. Olvera, and Aldo Panfichi, eds. (2006). La disputa por la construcción democrática en América Latina. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, Archon. (2011). “Reinventing Democracy in Latin America (Review Essay),” Unpublished ms. prepared for Perspectives in Politics, July 31, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregori, Karina (2012). “Democratizacion y participacion ciudadana en El Salvador de la pos-guerra,” Unpublished paper prepared for the project on “Participation and Representation in Latin America.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Mogens Herman (1999). The Athenian Democracy in the Age of Demosthenes: Structure, Principles, and Ideology. trans by J.A. Cook. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky (2004). “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda”, Perspectives on Politics, 2 (4): 725–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, Albert O. (1970). Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations and States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtzager, Peter P. and Adrian Gurza Lavalle (2010). “Civil Society’s Claims to Political Representation in Brazil,” Studies in Comparative International Development, 45: 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lasswell, Harold D. (1936). Politics: Who gets what, when, how. London: Whittlesey house, McGraw-Hill book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven and James Loxton (2012). “Populism and Competitive Authoritarianism in the Andes.” Paper prepared for the XXX International Congress of the Latin American Studies Association, 23–25 May, 2012, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way (2010). Competitive Authoritarianism: The Origins and Evolution of Hybrid Regimes in the Post-Cold War Era. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Levitsky, Steven and Lucan A. Way (2002). “Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism,” Journal of Democracy 13, No. 2 (April): 51–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainwaring, Scott, Ana María Bejarano and Eduardo Pizarro Leongómez (2006) “The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes: An Overview,” in Mainwaring, Bejarano and Pizarro Leongomez, eds. The Crisis of Democratic Representation in the Andes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macpherson, C.B. (1977). The Life and Times of Liberal Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (2007). Dissonances: Democratic Critiques of Democrac. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (2004). “Why the Rule of Law Matters,” Journal of Democracy, 15 (4): 32–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (1999). “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies,” in A. Schedler, L. Diamond, and M. F. Plattner, eds. The Self-Restraining State: Power and Accountability in New Democracies. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (1996a). “Illusions About Consolidation,” Journal of Democracy, 7 (2): 34–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (1996b). “Illusions and Conceptual Flaws,” Journal of Democracy, 7 (4): 160–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo (1994). “Delegative Democracy,” Journal of Democracy, 5 (1): 55–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, Guillermo, Osvaldo Iazzetta and Jorge Vargas Cullell, eds. (2003). Democracia, desarrollo humano y ciudadanía: Reflexiones sobre la calidad de la democracia en América Latina. Rosario, Argentina Homo Sapiens Ediciones.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organización de Estados Americanos, Programade Naciones Unidas para Desarrollo (2010). Nuestra Democracia. Mexico: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pateman, Carole. (2012). “Participatory Democracy Revisited,” Perspectives on Politics, 10 (1): 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinnington, Elizabeth and Daniel Schugurensky, eds. (2010). Learning Citizenship by Practicing Democracy: International Initiatives and Perspectives. Newcastle Upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Postero, Nancy Grey (2007). Now We Are Citizens: Indigenous Politics in Postmulticultural Bolivia. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, Adam. (1991). Democracy and the Market. Cambridge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roncagliolo, Rafael, Carlos Meléndez, Jorge Valladares (2010). “Ejercicio de la representación y la participación política,” In Cameron and Luna, eds. Democracia en la region andina: Diversidad y desafíos. Lima: Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, Pierre (2011). Democratic Legitimacy: Impartiality, Reflexivity, Proximity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis, Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. (1942). Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selee, Andrew and Enrique Peruzzotti, eds. (2009). Participatory Innovation and Representative Democracy in Latin America. Washington, D.C. and Baltimore: Woodrow Wilson Center Press and The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, Max (1978). Economy and Society, Vol. I and II. G. Roth and C. Wittich, eds. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Maxwell A. Cameron Eric Hershberg Kenneth E. Sharpe

Copyright information

© 2012 Maxwell A. Cameron, Eric Hershberg, and Kenneth E. Sharpe

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cameron, M.A., Sharpe, K.E. (2012). Institutionalized Voice in Latin American Democracies. In: Cameron, M.A., Hershberg, E., Sharpe, K.E. (eds) New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270580_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics