Abstract
Japan shares with the Netherlands the characteristic of being a historic country of emigration but differs in the distinction of being a ‘latecomer to immigration’. Japan was a country of emigration from late 19th century until well into the 20th century. In the late 20th and the beginning of the 21st centuries, Japan wrestles with the challenges of contemporary immigration. A New York Times article quoted a Latin American Nikkeijin foreign worker in 2009 … “They put up with us (Latin American Nikkeijin) as long as they needed the labor …. But now that the economy is bad, they throw us a bit of cash and say goodbye.” The above quotes reveal a certain ambivalence (White et al., 1990) about the role of nationalism, particularly minzokushugi (ethnic nationalism), in Japan’s emigration and immigration policy. The first quote references Japan’s post-war prohibition against unskilled foreign labour and the change in immigration policy in 1990 that prioritized the ‘blood ties’ of Nikkeijin (Japanese descendants) and resulted in a surge of Latin American Nikkeijin immigration. The second quote refers to the 2009 programme that facilitated the paid voluntary repatriation of the very same unemployed Latin American Nikkeijin to their countries of origin. Nationalism is deployed at different times and periods to justify and legitimize various political actors and actions (Brubaker, 2004). This chapter looks at emigration and immigration policy in modern Japan and argues that they reveal long unresolved and contested visions of the role of ethnicity in Japanese nationalism and national identity.
If you are a specialist with professional skills then you are able to work in Japan. However, for the basic people who come as simple unskilled labourers Japan doesn’t accept at the moment those people coming under this kind of category. However, when we come to the second category (teijusha), these people are allowed to live in Japan because of their status or birthright. There is no discretion as to what activities they are doing. So it is quite possible, for example, that someone who has the teiju visa could carry out unskilled labor in Japan. That would be acceptable. And recently many numerous Nikkeijin (Japanese descendants) have come on this long term residence visa — the teiju visa.1
(Emphasis my own)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2014 Michael O. Sharpe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharpe, M.O. (2014). Constructing the Nation: Japanese Emigration and Immigration from the late 19th to the 21st Century. In: Postcolonial Citizens and Ethnic Migration. Palgrave Studies in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270559_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270559_5
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44437-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27055-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Intern. Relations & Development CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)