Advertisement

Conclusions

Chapter
  • 146 Downloads

Abstract

When people claim partiality in political satire, it is essentially the same thing as calling bias in an opinion piece—bias is sort of the point. Satire is a form of political criticism and political humor of all stripes aims its guns at politicians who are seen as inadequate. Satire must have a point of view or else the joke isn’t satire, which means there must be some bias inherent in the material. But critics of modern political humorists who call bias really are not worried about this in itself. They are, perhaps, more concerned that the satirists have left behind their primary entertaining function in order to advocate. When critics call bias, they are really charging “activism” because an activist is not trying for laughs—he is trying to change people’s minds. There is trepidation that a popular and easy-to-understand form of political commentary does double duty as crusading.

Keywords

Presidential Campaign Campaign Finance Daily Show Double Duty Night Television 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Alison Dagnes 2012

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations