Abstract
When people claim partiality in political satire, it is essentially the same thing as calling bias in an opinion piece—bias is sort of the point. Satire is a form of political criticism and political humor of all stripes aims its guns at politicians who are seen as inadequate. Satire must have a point of view or else the joke isn’t satire, which means there must be some bias inherent in the material. But critics of modern political humorists who call bias really are not worried about this in itself. They are, perhaps, more concerned that the satirists have left behind their primary entertaining function in order to advocate. When critics call bias, they are really charging “activism” because an activist is not trying for laughs—he is trying to change people’s minds. There is trepidation that a popular and easy-to-understand form of political commentary does double duty as crusading.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Copyright information
© 2012 Alison Dagnes
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dagnes, A. (2012). Conclusions. In: A Conservative Walks Into a Bar. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270344_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137270344_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-26284-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-27034-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)