National Allegory, Modernization, and the Cinematic Patrimony of the Marcos Regime



More than two decades have passed since the debacle of dictator Ferdinand E. Marcos, a key figure in Philippine modernization. Ironically, a regime remembered for its repression of the media is now regarded with profound nostalgia. The sense of nostalgia is most pronounced in the cinema, with recent films attesting to the longevity of the Marcos romance: Dekada 70 (Chito S. Roño, 2002), Imelda (Ramona S. Diaz, 2003), and Pinoy/Blonde (Peque Gallaga, 2005).


Motion Picture National Family Cultural Policy Film Industry Local Cinema 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ASEAN Committee on Culture and Information. “The Film Industry in the Philippines.” In ASEAN Country Reports on Film, 23–30. Manila: Office of Media Affairs, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, Tony. The Birth of the Museum: History, Theory, Politics. London: Routledge, 1995.Google Scholar
  3. Bonner, Raymond. Waltzing with a Dictator: The Marcoses and the Making of American Policy. New York: Vintage Books, 1988.Google Scholar
  4. del Mundo, Clodualdo. “Philippine Cinema: An Historical Overview.” Asian Cinema 10, n. 2 (1999): 29–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. De Vega, Guillermo C. Film and Freedom: Movie Censorship in the Philippines. Manila: Board of Censors for Motion Pictures, 1975.Google Scholar
  6. Donzelot, Jacques. The Policing of Families. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.Google Scholar
  7. Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. New York: Grove Press, 1963.Google Scholar
  8. Flor, Lina. “Problems of the Philippine Movie Industry.” The Fookien Times Yearbook (1961): 223, 231.Google Scholar
  9. Foucault, Michel. “Governmentality.” In The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality, edited by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, 87–104. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1991.Google Scholar
  10. Jameson, Frederic. “Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism.” Social Text 15 (1986): 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lacaba, José F. Days of Disquiet, Nights of Rage: The First Quarter Storm and Related Events. Manila: Anvil Publishing, 2003.Google Scholar
  12. Latham, Michael E. Modernization as Ideology: American Social Science and “Nation Building” in the Kennedy Era. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. Lent, John A. The Asian Film Industry. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press, 1990.Google Scholar
  14. Lumbera, Bienvenido. Pelikula: An Essay on Philippine Film: 1961–1992. Manila: Cultural Center of the Philippines, 1992.Google Scholar
  15. —. “Problems in Philippine Film History.” In Readings in Philippine Cinema, edited by Rafael Ma. Guerrero, 67–78. Manila: Experimental Cinema of the Philippines, 1983.Google Scholar
  16. Marcos, Ferdinand E. The Democratic Revolution in the Philippines. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall International, 1979.Google Scholar
  17. —. Five Years of the New Society. Manila: Marcos Foundation, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. —. An Ideology for Filipinos. Manila: Marcos Foundation, 1980.Google Scholar
  19. —. Letter of Instruction No. 13 to the Board of Censors for Motion Pictures. Manila, October 9, 1972. Reprinted in Official Gazette, October 9, 1972, 7955.Google Scholar
  20. —. Notes on the New Society of the Philippines. Manila: Marcos Foundation, 1973.Google Scholar
  21. Marcos, Imelda. “Film as Art.” Filipino Academy of Movie Arts and Sciences Awards. Manila, April 21, 1974. In The Compassionate Society and Other Selected Speeches, edited by Ilena Maramag, 58–9. Manila: National Media Production Center, 1975.Google Scholar
  22. McCoy, Alfred. “An Anarchy of Families: The Historiography of State and Family in the Philippines.” In An Anarchy of Families: State and Family in the Philippines, edited by Alfred McCoy, 1–32. Manila: Ateneo de Manila Press, 1998.Google Scholar
  23. Philippines Project Development Institute. “Feasibility Study: Philippine National Cinema Values Formation Program.” October, 1991.Google Scholar
  24. Rafael, Vicente. White Love and Other Events in Filipino History. Manila: Ateneo de Manila University Press, 2000.Google Scholar
  25. Republic of the Philippines Board of Censors for Motion Pictures. Guidelines on Film and Television Production and Exhibition. Manila: GPO, 1975.Google Scholar
  26. Riley, Denise. Am I That Name? Feminism and the Category of “Women” in History. London: Macmillan, 1988.Google Scholar
  27. Tejero, Constantino C. “Imelda’s Role as Patroness of the Arts.” Philippine Daily Inquirer, August 4, 2003, G2.Google Scholar
  28. Tiongson, Nicanor. “The Filipino Film Industry.” East-West Film Journal 6, n. 2 (1992): 23–61.Google Scholar
  29. —. “The Filipino Film in the Decade of the 1980s.” In The Urian Anthology1980–1989, edited by Nicanor Tiongson, xvi–xxxv. Manila: Antonio P. Tuvera, 2001.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, Woodrow. Constitutional Government in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press, 1921.Google Scholar
  31. Xavier, Ismail. Allegories of Underdevelopment: Aesthetics and Politics in Modern Brazilian Cinema. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 1997.Google Scholar
  32. Yúdice, George. The Expediency of Culture: Uses of Culture in the Global Era. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Talitha Espiritu 2013

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations