Skip to main content

What Can the Social Sciences Bring to an Understanding of Food Security?

  • Chapter
Why the Social Sciences Matter

Abstract

Food security and politics have been closely linked since Joseph gained the pharaoh’s favour in early Egyptian times, by successfully interpreting his dreams.1 Joseph forecast seven years of plenty and seven years of harvest failure. This foresight allowed the pharaoh to gather and store the surplus in good times, to take his people through hard times without famine and revolt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Chambers, R., Pacey, A. and Thrupp, L. A. (eds) (1989). Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Foresight. The Future of Food and Farming (2011). London: UK Government. IFAD Rural Poverty Report (2011). Rome: International Fund for Agricultural Development.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Agrimonde (2009). Agricultures et alimentations du monde en 2050: scénarios et défis pour un développement durable. Paris: Editions Quae.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Royal Society (2009). Reaping the Benefits: Science and the Sustainable Intensification of Global Agriculture. London: Royal Society.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Godfray, C. et al. (12 February 2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327(5967), 812–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Conway, G. (2012). One Billion Hungry. Can we Feed the World? Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Emmott, S. (2013). 10 billion, London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the Last First, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. IRRI, (1982). Report of an Explanatory Workshop on the Role of Anthropologists and Other Social Scientists in Interdisciplinary Teams Development Improved Food Production Technology, Manila: IRRI.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Snow, C. P. (1959). The Two Cultures, Cambridge: The Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beinhocker, E. D. (2007). The Origin of Wealth, London: Random House Business Books.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Soil Association (2010). Telling Porkies. The Big Fat Lie About Doubling Food Production, Bristol: Soil Association.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sen, A. K. (1982). Poverty and Famines. An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality, New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Drèze, J. and Sen, A. (1989). Hunger and Public Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang Jisheng (2012). Tombstone: The Untold Story of Mao’s Great Famine, London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Conway, G. (2012). One billion hungry. Can we feed the world? Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Foresight (2010). Tackling obesities: Future choices, London: UK Government.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ridley, M (2010). The rational optimist, London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pimbert, M. (2009) Towards Food Sovereignty: Reclaiming Autonomous Food Systems, London: IIED. http://www.iied.org/towards-food-sovereignty-re-claiming-autonomous-food-systems, accessed 12 September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Johnson, I., (2013). New York. The New York Times, available at http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/16/world/asia/chinas-great-uprooting-moving-250-million-into-cities.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0, accessed 5 September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Abidin, P.E., Nyekanyeka, T., Heck, S., McLean, S., Mnjengezulu, G., Chipungu, F., Chimsale, R. Botha, B. (2013) Less Hunger, Better Health and More Wealth: The Benefits of Knowledge Sharing in Malawi’s Orange-Fleshed Sweet Potato Project, Dublin: Hunger, Nutrition, Climate Justice. Conference: a new dialogue. Putting people at the heart of global development. Dublin April 15–16, 2013. http://www.mrfcj.org/pdf/case-studies/2013–04–16-Malawi-OFSP.pdf, 12 September 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Feder, G. (1985). The relationship between farm size and farm productivity. Journal of Development Economics. 18(2): 297–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Berry, R. A. and Cline, W. R. (1979). Agrarian Structure and Productivity in Developing Countries. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Barrett, C., M. F. Bellemare, J. Y. Hou, (2010). Reconsidering conventional explanations of the inverse productivity-size relationship. World Development, 38, 88–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chauveau, J-P., Bosc, P. M. and Pescay, M. (1998). Le plan foncier rural en côte d’Ivoire. In P. Lavigne Delville (ed.), Quelles politiques foncières en Afrique? Réconcilier pratiques, légitimité et légalité, Paris : Karthala-Coopération Française, 553–582.

    Google Scholar 

  27. de Janvry, A., G. Gordillo, E. Sadoulet, J-Ph. Platteau (ed.) (2001). Access to Land, Rural Poverty, and Public Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lavigne Delville, Ph., Toulmin, C. and Traoré, S. (eds)(2000) Gérer le foncier rural en Afrique de l’Ouest. Dynamiques foncières et interventions publiques. Paris: Karthala; Saint-Louis: URED, (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  29. Baland, J-M. and Platteau, J-Ph., (2000). Halting Degradation of Natural Resources: Is There a Role for Rural Communities? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Deininger, K. (2003). Land Policies for Growth and Poverty Reduction. Washington: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Toulmin, C. and Quan, J. (2000). Evolving Land Rights, Policy and Tenure in Africa, London: DFID/IIED/NRI.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cotula, L. (2013). The Great African Land Grab? London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ostrom, E., (1990). Governing the Commons, Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  35. Ostrom, E. (2002). The Drama of the Commons, Washington DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Djiré, M. (2004). Les Conventions Locales au Mal, London: IIED and Dakar: IED Afrique.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Behnke, Jr, R. H., Scoones, C. K. and Kerven, C. (eds) (1993). Range Ecology at Disequilibrium: New Models of Natural Variability and Pastoral Adaption in African Savannas, London: Overseas Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2015 Camilla Toulmin

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Toulmin, C. (2015). What Can the Social Sciences Bring to an Understanding of Food Security?. In: Michie, J., Cooper, C.L. (eds) Why the Social Sciences Matter. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137269928_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics