Skip to main content

Fostering Public Engagement in Wind Energy Development: The Role of Intermediaries and Community Benefits

  • Chapter
Learning from Wind Power

Part of the book series: Energy, Climate and the Environment Series ((ECE))

Abstract

In land-use planning, how developers engage with local residents is a crucial element in shaping public acceptance of large-scale renewable energy projects (Devine-Wright 2011). This chapter compares two UK offshore wind energy projects (Lincs and Gwynt y Mor) that were associated with contrasting levels of public acceptance. Data from in-depth interviews with key stakeholders were analysed to investigate how mechanisms and strategies of community engagement were constructed and practiced. These reveal the contrasting ways that development organisations with weak local ties seek to embed themselves in places affected by development proposals, through the strategic use of intermediaries and the provision of community benefits. In the Lincs case, which had low levels of public objection, the developer employed an intermediary early in the consultation process who can be characterised as playing a locally-based, education-oriented, ‘info-mediary’ (Fischer and Guy 2009) role. By contrast, in the Gwynt y Mor case that was associated with high levels of public objection, the developer employed an intermediary following the consultation process who can be characterised as playing a regionally based, passive, ‘PR’, representative role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Banville, J. (2005) The Sea, London: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake, J. (1999) ‘Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience’, Local Environment, 4, 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • British Wind Energy Association (2011) ‘Offshore wind energy: introduction’, http://www.bwea.com/offshore/info.html, accessed on 20 June 2011.

  • Cass, N. and Walker, G. (2009) ‘Emotion and rationality: the characterisation and evaluation of opposition to renewable energy projects’, Emotion, Space and Society, 2, 62–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centrica (2011) ‘Lincs Offshore Wind Farm’, http://www.centrica.com/index.asp?pageid=923&project=project5&projectstatus=construction#project5, accessed on 20 June 2011.

  • Cowell, R., Bristow, G. and Munday, M. (2011) ‘Acceptance, acceptability and environmental justice: the role of community benefits in wind power development’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 539–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown Estate (2012) ‘Our portfolio’, http://www.thecrownestate.co.uk/energy/offshore-wind-energy/our-portfolio/, accessed on 20 March 2012.

  • Dalby, S., and Mackenzie, F. (1997) ‘Reconceptualising local community: environment, identity and threat’, Area, 29, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DECC (Department of Energy and Climate Change) (2009) UK Offshore Energy SEA Environmental Report, London: DECC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. (2011) ‘Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy: breaking the NIMBY cycle’, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2, 19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Devine-Wright, P. and Howes, Y. (2010) ‘Disruption to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: a wind energy case study’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, G., Barry, J. and Robinson, C. (2007) ‘Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of windfarm proposals’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50, 517–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrier, D. (1997) ‘Wind energy in the coastal environment — prospects for a nearshore wind farm off East Anglia’, Marine Environmental Management Review of 1996 and Future Trends, 4, 85–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J. (2011) ‘Perceptions and preferences regarding offshore wind-power in the United States: the leading edge of a new energy source for the Americas’, in P. Devine-Wright (ed.) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, pp. 233–244, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J. and Kempton, W. (2007) ‘Public opinion about large offshore wind power: underlying factors’, Energy Policy, 35, 1584–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firestone, J., Kempton, W. and Krueger, A. (2009) ‘Public acceptance of offshore wind power projects in the United States’, Wind Energy, 12, 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. and Guy, S. (2009) ‘Re-interpreting Regulations: architects as intermediaries for low-carbon buildings’, Urban Studies, 46, 2577–2594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, K. (2010) ‘Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast’, Land Use Policy, 27, 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, B. (2004) ‘Social science responses to new challenges for the coast’, in G. Schernewski and T. Dolch (eds) Geographie der Meere und Kusten Coastal Futures I, London and Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalez, M. I. and B. Estevez (2005) ‘Participation, communication and negotiation in environmental conflicts: offshore wind energy in the Trafalgar Sea area’, Arbor-Ciencia Pensamiento Y Cultura, 181, 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, C. (2007) ‘Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: the application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance’, Energy Policy, 35, 2727–2736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggett, C. (2008) ‘Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms’, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10, 289–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. R., Morgan, C., Smith, B., Sorensen, H., Barthelmie, R. and Boesmans, B. (2002) ‘Offshore windpower: a major new source of energy for Europe’, International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 1, 356–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, A. R. (2002) ‘Offshore wind in Europe: the current state of the art’, Renewable Energy Focus, March/April, 14–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M. and Marvin, S. (2011) ‘Governing the reconfiguration of energy in Greater London: practical public engagement as “delivery”’, in P. Devine-Wright (ed.) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, pp. 89–100, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C. and Eiser, J. R. (2009) ‘Understanding “local” opposition to wind development in the UK: how big is a backyard?’, Energy Policy, 37, 4604–4614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempton, W., Firestone, J., Lilley, J., Rouleau, T. and Whitaker, P. (2005) ‘The offshore wind power debate: views from Cape Cod’, Coastal Management, 33, 119–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lente, H. van, Hekkert, M., Smits, R. and Waveren, B. van (2003) ‘Roles of systemic intermediaries in transition processes’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 7, 247–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nooteboom, B. (2007) ‘Social capital, institutions and trust’, Review of Social Economy, 65, 29–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian (2009) ‘Offshore wind farms could meet a quarter of the UK’s electricity needs’, 25 June, http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/jun/25/offshore-wind-uk-homes, accessed on 20 June 2011.

  • RWE npower renewables (2011) Gwynt y Mor Offshore Wind Farm, Project Components, http://www.rwe.com/web/cms/en/306636/rwe-npower-renewables/sites/projects-in-construction/wind/gwynt-y-mr-offshore-wind-farm/project-components/, accessed on 17 June 2011.

  • Soderholm, P., Ek, K. and Pettersen, M. (2007) ‘Wind power deployment in Sweden: global policies and local obstacles’, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 11, 365–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, K. C. (1998) ‘Technical and economic aspects of a floating offshore wind farm’, Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics, 74–76, 399–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb, T. (2006) ‘Offshore wind farms blown off schedule by two years’, The Independent, 16 April 2007, accessed from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/business/news/offshore-wind-farms-blown-off-schedule-by-two-years-474271.html, accessed on 20 June 2011.

  • Walker G., Cass, N., Burningham, K. and Barnett, J. (2010) ‘Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of “the public” and their implications’, Environment and Planning A, 42, 931–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Cass, N. and Devine-Wright, P. (2010) ‘Good neighbours, public relations and bribes: the politics and perceptions of community benefit provision in renewable energy development’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 12, 255–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G., Devine-Wright, P., Hunter, S., High, H. and Evans, B. (2010) ‘Trust and community: exploring the meanings, contexts and dynamics of community renewable energy’, Energy Policy, 38, 2655–2633.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, G. Devine-Wright, P., Barnett, J., Burningham, K., Cass, N., Devine-Wright, H., Speller, G., Barton, J., Evans, B., Heath, Y., Infield, D., Parks, J. and Theobald, K. (2011) ‘Symmetries, expectations, dynamics and contexts: a framework for understanding public engagement with renewable energy projects’, in P. Devine-Wright (ed.) Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, pp. 1–14, London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolsink, M. (2010) ‘Near-shore wind power — protected seascapes, environmentalists’ attitudes, and the technocratic planning perspective’, Land Use Policy, 27, 195–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yearley, S., Cinderby, S., Forrester, J., Bailey, P. and Rosen, P. (2003) ‘Participatory modelling and the local governance of the politics of UK air pollution: a three-city case study’, Environmental Values, 12, 247–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Patrick Devine-Wright

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Fostering Public Engagement in Wind Energy Development: The Role of Intermediaries and Community Benefits. In: Szarka, J., Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Strachan, P.A., Warren, C. (eds) Learning from Wind Power. Energy, Climate and the Environment Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137265272_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics