Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies ((PMMS))

Abstract

The war in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH) started 20 years ago. When BIH’s first free, multiparty elections in November 1990 were won by three dominant nationalist parties, all alike, they engaged in endless nationalistic quarrels. The war in BIH escalated in April 1992, when Bosnian Serbs started to besiege Sarajevo for 43 months, shelling Bosniak forces and terrorizing the civilian population with relentless bombardments. After nearly four years of civil war, with thousands of people killed and over a million people leaving their homes, the war in BIH was brought to an end by the signing of the Dayton Peace Agreement (DPA) in 1996. The DPA created the foundation for a new Bosnian state inhabited by three ethnic groups who had lived side by side for decades, but who now seemed to be further apart than ever before. In a way, the DPA legitimized the results of the war, that is it divided BIH into two entities: the Federation of BIH (with 51 per cent of the territory) in which mostly Bosnian Muslims (Bosniaks) and Bosnian Croats live, and Republic Srpska (with 49 per cent of the territory) populated almost exclusively by Bosnian Serbs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bell, D. (2003). ‘Mythscapes’. British Journal of Sociology, 54 (1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, R.G. (1982). ‘The unstructured interview as a conversation’, in R.G. Burgess (ed.), Field Research. London: Routledge, pp. 107–110.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Curak, N. (2010). Filozofija zagrljaja. Sarajevo: IK Rabic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrijevic, V. (ed.) (2010). Novosti iz pro Slosti. Beograd: Beogradski centar za ljudska prava. Available at http://www.bgcentar.org.rs/images/stories/Datoteke/novosti%20iz%20proslosti.pdf. Accessed 8 December 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dzihana, A. (2009). Media Reporting on European Integration in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Sarajevo: Mediaccentar Sarajevo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgerton, G.R. (2001). ‘Television as historian’, in G.R. Edgerton and P.C. Rollins (eds.), Television Histories: Shaping Collective Memory in the Media Age. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erjavec, K. and Volčič, Z. (2007). ‘“War on terrorism” a discursive battleground’. Discourse & Society, 18 (2), 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erjavec, K. and Volčič, Z. (2009). ‘Rehabilitating Milosevic’. Social semiotics, 19 (3), 125–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erjavec, K. and Volčič, Z. (2010). ‘“Target”, “cancer” and “warrior”: Exploring painful metaphors of self-representation used by girls born of war rape’. Discourse & Society, 21 (5), 524–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, R.J. (2004). ‘Prologue-what is history?-now’, in D. Cannadine (ed.), What is History Now? New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, A. (2010). Europe’s Balkan Dilemma. London and New York: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the News. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halbwachs, M. (1980 [1951]). The Collective Memory. New York and London: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1989). Ideologie, Kultur, Medien: Neue Rechte, Rassismus. Hamburg: Argument.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996). ‘The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees’, in D. Morley and K.H. Chen (eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical Dialogues in Cultural Studies. London: routledge, pp. 25–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (2003). Present Pasts. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jusic, T. (2004). ‘Bosnia and Herzegovina’, in B. Petkovic (ed.), Media Ownership and Its Impact on Media Independence and Pluralism. Ljubljana: Peace Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, C. (2002). ‘Anniversary journalism, collective memory, and the cultural authority to tell the story of the American past’. Journal of Popular Culture, 36 (1), 44–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, C. (2003). ‘Mourning in America: Ritual, redemption, and recovery in news narrative after September 11’. Journalism Studies, 4 (2), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, C. (2005). Pages from the Past: History and Memory in American Magazines. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitch, C. (2006). ‘“Useful memory” in Time Inc. Magazines: Summary journalism and the popular construction of history’. Journalism Studies, 7 (1), 105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuburovic, I. (2010). The Public Image of the High Representation in BIH Print Media. Ljubljana: Faculty of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurspahic, K. (2003). Prime Time Crime. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, D.B. (2002). Balkan Holocausts? Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Making Bosnia and Herzegovina Work, FORUM/NED Roundtable Summary Report. (2010). Available at http://www.ned.org/sites/default/files/Bosnia%20report. pdf. Accessed 9 December 2010.

  • Margalit, A. (2002). The Ethics of Memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, O. (2002). ‘Still photographs, and dynamic memories: An analysis of the visual presentation of Israel’s past in commemorative newspaper supplements’. The Communication Review, 5, 179–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, O. (2007). ‘Memory in journalism and the memory of journalism: Israeli journalist and the constructed legacy of Haolam Hazeh’. Journal of Communication, 57, 719–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris-Suzuki, T. (2005). The Past Within Us. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, E. (1991). ‘What is a nation?’, in H. Bhabha (ed.), Nation and Narration. London: Routledge, pp. 34–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schudson, M. (1995). ‘Dynamics of distortion in collective memory’, in D.L. Schacter (ed.), Memory Distortion. Harvard: Harvard University Press, pp. 365–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simic, O. (2011). Bringing “Justice” Home? Bosnians, War Criminals and the Interaction between the Cosmopolitan and the Local, 12 German Law Journal 1388–1407 (2011), Available at http://www.germanlawjournal.com/index.php?pageID=11&artID=1366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sladecek, M. and Dzihana, A. (2009). ‘Spinning out of control: Media coverage in the Bosnian conflict’, in P. Kolstø (ed.), Media Discourse and the Yugoslav Conflicts: Representations of Self and Other. Chesterfield: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statisticki Bilten. (1991). Sarajevo: Republic’s Bureau for Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturken, M. (1997). Tangled Memories. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, A.T. (1989). Macrostructures. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volkmer, I. (ed.) (2006). News in Public Memory. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, S.L. (1995). Balkan Tragedy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (1992). Covering the Body: The Kennedy Assassination, the Media, and the Shaping of Collective Memory. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (1993a). ‘Journalists as interpretative communities’. Critical Studies in Mass Communication, 10 (3), 219–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (1993b). ‘News: first or final draft of history?’ Mosaic, 2 (1), 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelizer, B. (2008). ‘Why memory’s work on journalism does not reflect journalism’s work on memory’. Memory Studies, 1 (1), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Zala Volčič and Karmen Erjavec

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Volčič, Z., Erjavec, K. (2012). ‘Media Memories’ in Bosnia and Herzegovina. In: Lee, P., Thomas, P.N. (eds) Public Memory, Public Media and the Politics of Justice. Palgrave Macmillan Memory Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137265173_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics