Peasant Perspectives on National Unity and Reconciliation: Building Peace or Promoting Division?
In 2004, the government declared Rwanda ‘a nation rehabilitated from the scourge of genocide’, meaning that it had returned peace and security to the country after only 10 years (ORTPN, 2004: 4). The key government mechanism in rebuilding society is the policy of national unity and reconciliation (henceforward ‘the policy’): an ambitious social engineering project that the Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF)-led government believes will forge a unified Rwandan identity while fostering reconciliation between survivors of the genocide and its perpetrators. The official narrative of national unity and reconciliation argues that the combination of a docile and obedient population, a legacy of authoritarian government, and colonial policies of ethnic divisionism caused the 1994 genocide. Thus ‘Rwanda cannot recover from the effects of the genocide until national unity is restored’ (author’s interview with senior RPF official, Kigali, April 2006). According to the peasant Rwandans I consulted, however, the policy is an oppressive force in their daily lives: the post-genocide state ‘organises everything’ and ‘makes decisions’ that regular folk are then left to interpret and implement according to the official narrative (author’s interviews with peasant Rwandans in South province, 2006).
KeywordsGood Governance National Unity Reconciliation Commission Ethnic Divisionism Policy Technique
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Kituo Cha Katiba (2006) Civil Society and the Struggle for a Better Rwanda. A Report of the Fact-finding Mission to Rwanda organised under the auspices of Kituo Cha Katiba (Kampala: Fountain Publishers).Google Scholar
- Haskell, L. and L. Waldorf (2011) ‘The Impunity Gap of the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda: Causes and Consequences’, Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 34 (1), 49–85.Google Scholar
- Jha, U.S. and S. Yadav (2004) Rwanda, Towards Reconciliation, Good Governance and Development. In Honour of His Excellency Mr Paul Kagame President of the Republic of Rwanda (New Delhi: Association of Indian Africanists).Google Scholar
- NURC (National Unity and Reconciliation Commission) (2004) The Rwandan Conflict: Origin, Development, Exit Strategies (Kigali: NURC).Google Scholar
- NURC (2006a) The Ingando Concept and it’s [sic] Syllabus Reform (Kigali: NURC).Google Scholar
- NURC (2006b) The A-Z of Ingando (Kigali: NURC).Google Scholar
- ORTPN (Office Rwandaise du tourisme et des parcs nationaux) (2004) Rwanda (Kigali: ORTPN).Google Scholar
- Senate of the Republic of Rwanda (2007) Rwanda: Genocide Ideology and Strategies for its Eradication (Kigali: Government of Rwanda).Google Scholar
- Straus, S. (2006) The Order of Genocide: Race, Power and War in Rwanda (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
- Thomson, S. (2009) Resisting Reconciliation: State Power and Everyday Life in Post-Genocide Rwanda, PhD dissertation, Department of Political Science, Dalhousie University.Google Scholar
- Thomson, S. (2011) ‘Re-education for Reconciliation: Participant Observations on Ingando’, in Scott Straus and Lars Waldorf (eds), Reconstructing Rwanda: State Building and Human Rights after Mass Violence (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press), 331–9.Google Scholar
- Thomson, S. and R. Nagy (2010) ‘Law, Power and Justice: What Legalism Fails to Address in the Functioning of Rwanda’s Gacaca Court’, International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4 (3), 11–30.Google Scholar
- Waldorf, L. (2006) ‘Mass Justice for Mass Atrocity: Rethinking Local Justice as Transitional Justice’, Temple Law Review, 79 (1), 1–87.Google Scholar
- Waldorf, L. (2007) ‘Censorship and Propaganda in Post-genocide Rwanda’, in A. Thompson (ed.), The Media and the Rwandan Genocide (Ottawa: IDRC), 14–37.Google Scholar
- Waldorf, L. (2010) ‘“A Mere Pretense of Justice”: Complementarity, Sham Trials, and Victor’s Justice at the Rwanda Tribunal’, Fordham International Law Journal, 33 (4), 1221–77.Google Scholar
- Young, M. (2004) ‘Five Faces of Power’, in L. Heldke (ed.), Oppression, Privilege, & Resistance: Theoretical Perspectives on Racism, Sexism and Heterosexism (Boston: McGraw Hill), 37–63.Google Scholar