Deterioration of Aid Coordination in Gacaca Implementation: Dealing with the Past for a Better Future?

  • Astrid Jamar


Since 2005, community-based tribunals have prosecuted more than a million alleged genocide perpetrators in Rwanda. About 60 per cent of the gacaca project was funded by external donors. Donors have also financed the monitoring of gacaca’s implementation by Rwandan and international NGOs.1 The impressive leadership and anti-interventionist narratives of the newly re-elected Paul Kagame have provoked antagonistic reactions within the international community.2 At the end of the gacaca process, an analysis of the evolution of relations between the actors involved in its establishment, and the causes and implications of these changes would enable the addressing of questions like: Why have the relations between actors involved in gacaca changed throughout its implementation? How has the political context and legacies of past interventionism influenced the negotiations in the establishment of the gacaca process? What are the current and future challenges for the international community and civil society in Rwanda?


Civil Society International Community Transitional Justice Civil Affair Justice Sector 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amnesty International (2010) ‘Safer to Stay Silent: The Chilling Effect of Rwanda’s Laws on “Genocide Ideology” and “Sectarianism”’ (London: Amnesty International), at:
  2. Aron, R. (1961) Dimensions de la conscience historique (Paris: Plon).Google Scholar
  3. Avocats Sans Frontières, Monitoring of the Gacaca Courts - Judgment Phase - Analytical ReportsGoogle Scholar
  4. Report No. 1 (March–September 2005)Google Scholar
  5. Report No. 2 (October 2005–September 2006)Google Scholar
  6. Report No. 3 (October 2006–April 2007)Google Scholar
  7. Report No. 4 (May–December 2007 - in French)Google Scholar
  8. Report No. 5 (January 2008–March 2010 - in French) (Brussels: ASF), at:
  9. ASF (Avocats Sans Frontières) (2004) Plan d’Action 2005 de la Mission d’ASF au Rwanda (on file with author).Google Scholar
  10. ASF, PRI, RCN, CDDH (2006) ‘NGO Justice Position - Paper Subject: Proposed amendment of the organic law number 16/2004 dated 19 June 2004’, 16 October 2006, available as appendix VI in ASF, ‘Monitoring of the Gacaca Courts Judgment Phase Analytical Report No. 2, October 2005–September 2006’.Google Scholar
  11. Barnett, M. (2003) Eyewitness to a Genocide: The United Nations and Rwanda (New York: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
  12. da Câmara S. (2001) ‘The European Union’s Political and Development Response to Rwanda’, ECDPM Discussion Paper No. 27 (Maastricht, ECDPM).Google Scholar
  13. Corey, A. and S. Joireman (2004) ‘Retributive Justice: The Gacaca Courts in Rwanda’, African Affairs, 103 (410), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Courrier International (2001) ‘Retour à la justice coutumière’, at:, 2 April.Google Scholar
  15. Dallaire, R. (2003) J’ai serré la Main du Diable (Montreal: Libre Expression).Google Scholar
  16. de Jonge, K. (2010) PRI’s Research on Gacaca, Penal Reform International, 1 May, at:’s-research-gacaca-klass-de-jonges- commentary
  17. Digneffe, F. and J. Fierens (2003) Justice et gacaca, l’expérience rwandaise et le génocide (Namur: Presses Universitaires de Namur).Google Scholar
  18. Gready, P. (2009) ‘Civil Society and Policy Making in Rwanda: A Case Study of Land Reform and the Gacaca Courts’, London School of Economics, Non-Governmental Public Action Programme, Research Paper 32.Google Scholar
  19. Guardian, The (2010) ‘Burundi, Rwanda expel Human Rights Watch Workers’, 20 March.Google Scholar
  20. Hayman, R. (2007) ‘“Milking the Cow”: Negotiating Ownership of Aid and Policy in Rwanda’, Managing Aid Dependency Project GEG Working Paper 2007/26 (University College, Oxford: GEG).Google Scholar
  21. Hirondelle News Agency (2008) ‘Alison Des Forges Interdite de Séjour au Rwanda’, 24 December. at: Scholar
  22. HRW (Human Rights Watch) (2010) ‘Allow Human Rights Watch to Work - Government Denies Visa to Rights Researcher in Crackdown on Critics’, 23 April.Google Scholar
  23. Ingelaere, B. (2008) ‘The Gacaca Courts in Rwanda’, in L. Huyse and M. Salter (eds), Traditional Justice after Violent Conflict: Learning from African Experiences (Stockholm: International IDEA).Google Scholar
  24. Ingelaere, B. (2009) ‘Do We Understand Life after Genocide? Centre and Periphery in the Knowledge Construction in/on Rwanda’, IOB Working Paper 2009.01, University of Antwerp, June.Google Scholar
  25. Institute for Justice and Reconciliation (2008) ‘Peace beyond Justice, The Gacaca Courts of Rwanda’, multimedia source, 2008.Google Scholar
  26. IRIN (2009) ‘Rwanda: Des questions demeurent sur l’efficacité des tribunaux “Gacaca”’, 24 June, at: 84993.Google Scholar
  27. Jewsiewicki, B. (2004) ‘Héritages et réparations en quête d’une justice pour le passé ou le présent’, Cahiers d’Études africaines, 173–174, 7–24.Google Scholar
  28. Journal Inkiko Gacaca (2006), No. 61, at:
  29. Kagame, P. (2009) President of the Republic of Rwanda - Paul Kagame, 15th Commemoration of the Genocide against the Tutsi at the Nyanza Memorial Site in Kicukiro, at: 2009&catid=34%3Aspeeches&Itemid=56&lang=en, Kigali, 7 April.
  30. Longman, T. (2006) ‘Justice at the Grassroots, Gacaca Trials in Rwanda’, in N. Roth-Arriaza and J. Mariezcurrena (eds), Transitional Justice in the Twenty-first Century: Beyond Truth versus Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 206–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyerstein, A. (2007) ‘Between Law and Culture: Rwanda’s Gacaca and Postcolonial Legality’, Law & Social Inquiry, 32 (2), 467–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Oomen, B. (2005) ‘Donor-driven Justice and Its Discontents: The Case of Rwanda’, Development and Change, 36 (5), 887–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Penal Reform International, PRI Research on Gacaca Reports, Reports 1 to 12, 2002 to 2010, at:
  34. Pottier, J. (2002) Reimagining Rwanda. Conflict, Survival and Disinformation in the Late Twentieth Century (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  35. Presentation at the Peer Meeting (2008) ‘Sector Budget Support Mechanisms in Rwanda, Workshop on the Justice Sector SWAP development’, presentation at the Peer Meeting by Belgian Cooperation Representative on 25 June (Powerpoint document on file with author).Google Scholar
  36. Reyntjens, F. (2007) ‘Chronique Politique du Rwanda 2005–2007’, in M. Stefaan and F. Reyntjens (eds), Afrique des grands lacs, l’annuaire 2006/2007 (Paris: L’Harmattan).Google Scholar
  37. Reyntjens, F. and S. Vandeginste (2005) ‘Rwanda: An Atypical Transition’, in E. Skaar et al. (eds), Roads to Reconciliation (Lanham: Lexington Books), 101–27.Google Scholar
  38. Rosoux, V. (2001) ‘Poids et Usage du Passé dans les Relations Franco-Algériennes’, L’Annuaire français des relations internationales, vol. II (Paris: France Diplomatie).Google Scholar
  39. Rosoux, V. (2006) ‘La mémoire de la colonisation: Fer de la Lance ou Talon d’Achile de la Politique Etrangere Belge?’, in S. Jaumain (ed.), Mémoire de guerre, et construction de la paix (Brussels: Peter Lang).Google Scholar
  40. SNJG (Service National des Juridictions Gacaca) (2010) ‘Dossiers à juger par les Juridictions Gacaca au 15/03/2010’ (on file with author).Google Scholar
  41. Tertsakian, C. (2008) Le Château, the Lives of Prisoners in Rwanda (London: Arves Books).Google Scholar
  42. Uvin, P. (1998) Aiding Violence, Development Enterprise in Rwanda (West Hartford: Kumarian Press).Google Scholar
  43. Waldorf, L. (2010) ‘“Like Jews Waiting for Jesus”: Posthumous Justice in Post-Genocide Rwanda’, in R. Shaw and L. Waldorf (eds), Localizing Transitional Justice, Interventions and Priorities after Mass Violence (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Astrid Jamar 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Astrid Jamar

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations