Skip to main content

Abstract

Given that this collection of essays—“Remake | Remodel”—takes its title from the opening track of a retro-album, Roxy Music (1972) by Roxy Music, it seems appropriate to begin with music writer Simon Reynolds’ recent book, Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. “Instead of being the threshold of the future,” writes Reynolds, “the first ten years of the twenty-first century turned out to be the ‘Re’ Decade. The 2000s were dominated by the ‘re-’ prefix: revivals, reissues, remakes, re-enactments” (xi). Across the book, Reynolds mainly takes an interest in a “retro-consciousness” prevalent in contemporary popular music— band reformations and reunion tours, album reissues and revivals, coverversions and mash-ups—but he notes that the current “malaise is not restricted to pop music. … Look at the Hollywood mania for remaking blockbuster movies from a couple of decades earlier. … When they’re not revamping proven box-office successes of the past, the movie industry is adapting much-loved ‘iconic’ TV series for the big screen” (xv). And Reynolds does not stop there. In addition to these “visibly fevered zones of retro-mania,” he discerns other areas of cultural re-production: retro fashion, retro toys, retro games, retro food, retro candy … even retro porn (xvii–xviii). Although the evidence suggests that “the 2000s’ most commercially prominent trends involved recycling” (xix), Reynolds is quick to point out that “Retromania is not a straightforward denunciation of retro as a manifestation of cultural regression or decadence” and that research into the book revealed “the extent to which retro-related issues have been a long-running preoccupation” (xxi–xxii, emphasis added).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Works consulted

  • Albrecht-Crane, Christa, and Dennis Cutchins. “Introduction: New Beginnings for Adaptation Studies.” Adaptation Studies: New Approaches. Ed. Albrecht-Crane and Cutchins. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. 11–22. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altman, Rick. Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute, 1999. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, Dudley. “Adaptation.” Naremore. 28–37. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casetti, Francesco. “Adaptation and Mis-adaptations: Film, Literature, and Social Discourses.” A Companion to Literature and Film. Ed. Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004. 82–91. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazdyn, Eric. The Flash of Capital: Film and Geopolitics in Japan. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eberwein, Robert. “Remakes and Cultural Studies.” Horton and McDougal. 15–33. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, Jennifer, ed. The Legend Returns and Dies Harder Another Day: Essays on Film Series. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2008. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and Leonard R. Koos, eds. Dead Ringers: The Remake in Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frow, Jonn. Rev. of Play It Again, Sam: Retakes on Remakes, ed. Andrew Horton, and Stuart Y. McDougal. Screening the Past 7 (1999): Retrieved on 9 November 2011. www.latrobe.edu.au/screeningthepast/shorts/reviews/rev0799/jfbr7a.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, Catherine. “Recognising Billy Budd in Beau Travail: Epistemology and Hermeneutics of an Auteurist ‘Free’ Adaptation.” Screen 43.1 (2002): 57–73. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, Jonathan. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, Cornel Sandvoss, and C. Lee Harrington, eds. Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, 2007. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills, Matt. Fan Cultures. London/New York: Routledge, 2002. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —. Triumph of a Time Lord: Regenerating Doctor Who in the Twenty-first Century. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoberman, J. “Ten Years that Shook the World.” American Film 10 (June 1985): 34–59. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton, Andrew, and Stuart Y. McDougal, eds. Play It Again, Sam: Retakes on Remakes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idato, Michael. “All Eyes on the Reprise.” Age (10 March 2011): 12. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, Henry. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge, 1992. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Film Sequels: Theory and Practice from Hollywood to Bollywood. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. Print.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • —, and Constantine Verevis, eds. Second Takes: Critical Approaches to the Film Sequel. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2010. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitch, Thomas. “Twelve Fallacies in Contemporary Adaptation Theory.” Criticism 45.2 (Spring 2003): 149–71. Print.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. “Twice-Told Tales: Disavowal and the Rhetoric of the Remake.” Forrest and Koos 37–62. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Lisa A., ed. The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London/ New York: Routledge, 1992. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathijs, Ernest, ed. The Lord of the Rings: Popular Culture in Global Context. London: Wallflower Press, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazdon, Lucy. Encore Hollywood: Remaking French Cinema. London: British Film Institute, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, Brian. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naremore, James, ed. Film Adaptation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. “Film and the Reign of Adaptation.” Naremore 1–18. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Roberta, ed. Reading Lost: Perspectives on a Hit Television Show. London: I. B. Tauris, 2009. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, Claire, and Constantine Verevis, eds. Film Trilogies: New Critical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapold, Nicholas. “A Director’s Toughest Competition.” New York Times 13 March 2011: 10, 12. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, Robert B. “Film and Literature.” How a Film Theory Got Lost and Other Mysteries in Cultural Studies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001. 120–31. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, Simon. Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. London: Faber and Faber, 2011. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stam, Robert. “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation.” Naremore 54–76. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, Lesley. “Emma in Los Angeles: Remaking the Book and the City.” Naremore 221–38. Print.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verevis, Constantine. Film Remakes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. Print.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2012 Kathleen Loock and Constantine Verevis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Loock, K., Verevis, C. (2012). Introduction: Remake | Remodel. In: Loock, K., Verevis, C. (eds) Film Remakes, Adaptations and Fan Productions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263353_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics