Abstract
Given that this collection of essays—“Remake | Remodel”—takes its title from the opening track of a retro-album, Roxy Music (1972) by Roxy Music, it seems appropriate to begin with music writer Simon Reynolds’ recent book, Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. “Instead of being the threshold of the future,” writes Reynolds, “the first ten years of the twenty-first century turned out to be the ‘Re’ Decade. The 2000s were dominated by the ‘re-’ prefix: revivals, reissues, remakes, re-enactments” (xi). Across the book, Reynolds mainly takes an interest in a “retro-consciousness” prevalent in contemporary popular music— band reformations and reunion tours, album reissues and revivals, coverversions and mash-ups—but he notes that the current “malaise is not restricted to pop music. … Look at the Hollywood mania for remaking blockbuster movies from a couple of decades earlier. … When they’re not revamping proven box-office successes of the past, the movie industry is adapting much-loved ‘iconic’ TV series for the big screen” (xv). And Reynolds does not stop there. In addition to these “visibly fevered zones of retro-mania,” he discerns other areas of cultural re-production: retro fashion, retro toys, retro games, retro food, retro candy … even retro porn (xvii–xviii). Although the evidence suggests that “the 2000s’ most commercially prominent trends involved recycling” (xix), Reynolds is quick to point out that “Retromania is not a straightforward denunciation of retro as a manifestation of cultural regression or decadence” and that research into the book revealed “the extent to which retro-related issues have been a long-running preoccupation” (xxi–xxii, emphasis added).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Works consulted
Albrecht-Crane, Christa, and Dennis Cutchins. “Introduction: New Beginnings for Adaptation Studies.” Adaptation Studies: New Approaches. Ed. Albrecht-Crane and Cutchins. Madison, WI: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 2010. 11–22. Print.
Altman, Rick. Film/Genre. London: British Film Institute, 1999. Print.
Andrew, Dudley. “Adaptation.” Naremore. 28–37. Print.
Casetti, Francesco. “Adaptation and Mis-adaptations: Film, Literature, and Social Discourses.” A Companion to Literature and Film. Ed. Robert Stam and Alessandra Raengo. Malden, MA: Blackwell, 2004. 82–91. Print.
Cazdyn, Eric. The Flash of Capital: Film and Geopolitics in Japan. Durham: Duke University Press, 2002. Print.
Eberwein, Robert. “Remakes and Cultural Studies.” Horton and McDougal. 15–33. Print.
Forrest, Jennifer, ed. The Legend Returns and Dies Harder Another Day: Essays on Film Series. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 2008. Print.
—, and Leonard R. Koos, eds. Dead Ringers: The Remake in Theory and Practice. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2002. Print.
Frow, Jonn. Rev. of Play It Again, Sam: Retakes on Remakes, ed. Andrew Horton, and Stuart Y. McDougal. Screening the Past 7 (1999): Retrieved on 9 November 2011. www.latrobe.edu.au/screeningthepast/shorts/reviews/rev0799/jfbr7a.htm.
Grant, Catherine. “Recognising Billy Budd in Beau Travail: Epistemology and Hermeneutics of an Auteurist ‘Free’ Adaptation.” Screen 43.1 (2002): 57–73. Print.
Gray, Jonathan. Show Sold Separately: Promos, Spoilers, and Other Media Paratexts. New York: New York University Press, 2010. Print.
—, Cornel Sandvoss, and C. Lee Harrington, eds. Fandom: Identities and Communities in a Mediated World. New York: New York University Press, 2007. Print.
Hills, Matt. Fan Cultures. London/New York: Routledge, 2002. Print.
—. Triumph of a Time Lord: Regenerating Doctor Who in the Twenty-first Century. London: I. B. Tauris, 2010. Print.
Hoberman, J. “Ten Years that Shook the World.” American Film 10 (June 1985): 34–59. Print.
Horton, Andrew, and Stuart Y. McDougal, eds. Play It Again, Sam: Retakes on Remakes. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Print.
Idato, Michael. “All Eyes on the Reprise.” Age (10 March 2011): 12. Print.
Jenkins, Henry. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge, 1992. Print.
—. Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. New York: New York University Press, 2006. Print.
—. Fans, Bloggers, and Gamers: Exploring Participatory Culture. New York: New York University Press, 2006. Print.
Jess-Cooke, Carolyn. Film Sequels: Theory and Practice from Hollywood to Bollywood. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009. Print.
—, and Constantine Verevis, eds. Second Takes: Critical Approaches to the Film Sequel. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 2010. Print.
Leitch, Thomas. “Twelve Fallacies in Contemporary Adaptation Theory.” Criticism 45.2 (Spring 2003): 149–71. Print.
—. “Twice-Told Tales: Disavowal and the Rhetoric of the Remake.” Forrest and Koos 37–62. Print.
Lewis, Lisa A., ed. The Adoring Audience: Fan Culture and Popular Media. London/ New York: Routledge, 1992. Print.
Mathijs, Ernest, ed. The Lord of the Rings: Popular Culture in Global Context. London: Wallflower Press, 2006. Print.
Mazdon, Lucy. Encore Hollywood: Remaking French Cinema. London: British Film Institute, 2000. Print.
McFarlane, Brian. Novel to Film: An Introduction to the Theory of Adaptation. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996. Print.
Naremore, James, ed. Film Adaptation. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000. Print.
—. “Film and the Reign of Adaptation.” Naremore 1–18. Print.
Pearson, Roberta, ed. Reading Lost: Perspectives on a Hit Television Show. London: I. B. Tauris, 2009. Print.
Perkins, Claire, and Constantine Verevis, eds. Film Trilogies: New Critical Approaches. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012. Print.
Rapold, Nicholas. “A Director’s Toughest Competition.” New York Times 13 March 2011: 10, 12. Print.
Ray, Robert B. “Film and Literature.” How a Film Theory Got Lost and Other Mysteries in Cultural Studies. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2001. 120–31. Print.
Reynolds, Simon. Retromania: Pop Culture’s Addiction to Its Own Past. London: Faber and Faber, 2011. Print.
Stam, Robert. “Beyond Fidelity: The Dialogics of Adaptation.” Naremore 54–76. Print.
Stern, Lesley. “Emma in Los Angeles: Remaking the Book and the City.” Naremore 221–38. Print.
Verevis, Constantine. Film Remakes. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2006. Print.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Kathleen Loock and Constantine Verevis
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Loock, K., Verevis, C. (2012). Introduction: Remake | Remodel. In: Loock, K., Verevis, C. (eds) Film Remakes, Adaptations and Fan Productions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263353_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137263353_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-44253-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-26335-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Media & Culture CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)