Skip to main content

How Islam Questions the Universalism of Western Secularism

  • Chapter
Book cover Why the West Fears Islam

Part of the book series: Culture and Religion in International Relations ((CRIR))

  • 531 Accesses

Abstract

In March 2000, an atheist association claimed the right to broadcast a message on the nonexistence of God, for several minutes each week in reaction to the call to prayer granted to the grand mosque of Oslo by the municipality.1 This is one of many examples of the rejection of Islamic signs perceived as a violation of secular principles in Europe that, unlike in the United States, predates 9/11. Since then, more acute crises have occurred across European countries, including the September 2005 Danish cartoon incident; the November 2009 minaret ban in Switzerland; and the 2010 to 2011 wave of niqab bans in France, Belgium, and Spain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Gerhard Robbers, “State and Church in the European Union,” in State and Church in the European Union, ed. Gerhard Robbers (Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2005): 54–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Joel S. Fetzer and J. Christopher Soper, “Explaining and Accommodation of Muslim Religious Practices in France, Britain and Germany,” paper presented at the Muslims in Western Europe Politics Conference, Bloomington, Indiana, September 22–24, 2005 and Jonathan Laurence ed., The Emancipation of Eurolie’s Muslims: The State’s Role in Minority Integration (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Joel S. Fetzer and J. Christopher Soper, Muslims and the State in Britain, France, and Germany (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Robert Audi ed., The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tariq Madood, Multicultural Politics: Racism, Ethnicity, and Muslims in Britain (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jürgen Habermas, Judith Butler, Charles Taylor, Cornel West, The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere (New York: Columbia University Press, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gert Hekma, “Imams and Homosexuality: A Post-Gay Debate in the Netherlands,” Sexualities 5 (2002): 237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Paul Marshall and Nina Shea, Silence: How Apostasy and Blasphemy Codes are Choking Freedom Worldwide (New York: Oxford University Press, 2011), 186.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Interestingly, at the time of the cartoons crisis, Muslim associations in Denmark tried to use blasphemy laws to promote Muslims’ rights to respect. Jytte Klausen, The Cartoons that Shook the World (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2009), 49.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jocelyne Cesari, Muslims in the West After 9/11: Religion, Law and Politics (New York: Routledge, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Andrea Buchler, Islamic Lawin Eurofie? Legal Pluralism and Its Limits in European Family Laws (Burlington: Ashgate, 2011), 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jennifer Selby and Anna C. Korteweg, Debating Shari’a. Islam, Gender Politics and Family Law Arbitration (University of Toronto Press, 2012), 23.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Limping maniages define situations where the couple is divorced according to secular civil law but the religious divorce has not be finalized for multiple reasons. Most of the time it is because the husband misuses his privilege by refusing to grant talaq (divorce) to his wife. Sonia Shah-Kazemi, Untying the Knot: Muslim Women, Divorce and the Shari’ah (London: Nuffield Foundation, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halima Boumidienne, “African Muslim Women in France,” in God’s Law versus State Law, ed. Michael King (London: Grey Seal, 1995), 49–61.

    Google Scholar 

  15. In the British context, Werner Menski calls these syncretic practices, “angrezi shari’a” (Urdu term that expresses the mix of Islamic and English legal references). See Werner Menski, “Muslim Law in Britain,” Journal of Asian and African Studies 62 (September 30, 2001), 127–163.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mary E. Hess, “2010 Presidential Address: Learning Religion and Religiously Learning Amid Global Cultural Flows,” Religious Education 106(4) (2011): 360–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. These are the four major schools of jurisprudence that have codified Islamic law across the Muslim world. With the emergence of nation-states, each country has adopted the dominant school of jurisprudence as the source for civil law while continuously reforming it. See Knut S. Vikor, Between God and the Sultan. A History of Islamic Law (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jorgen S. Nielsen, “Emerging Claims of Muslim Populations in Matters of Family Law in Europe (Birmingham: Centre for the Study of Islam and Christian Muslim Relations, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Maleiha Malik, Discrimination Law: Theory and Practice (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bryan S. Turner and Berna Zengin Arslan, “Shariá and Legal Pluralism in the West,” European Journal of Social Theory 14(2) (2011): 139–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pierre Mercier, Conflits De Civilisations et Droit International Prive. Polygamie et Repudiatio (Genève: Droz, 1972)

    Google Scholar 

  22. and Jean Deprez, “Droit international prive et conflit de civilisations. Aspects méthodologiques. Les relations entre systèmes d’Europe Occidentale et systèmes islamiques en matière de statutpersonnel,” Recueil des Cours de l’Académie de la Haye 211 (1988): 9–372.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dominique Colas, Civil Society and Fanaticism: Conjoined Histories (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1997).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Talal Asad, Genealogies of Religion: Discipline and Reasons of Power in Christianity and Islam (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Michael E. Connolly, Why i Am Not a Secularist (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Norbert Elias, On the Process of Civilisation. Volume 3: Collect Works of Norbert Elias (Dublin: University College Dublin Press, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. and Walter Ong, Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word (New York: Routledge, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Grace Davies, “New Approaches in the Sociology of Religion: A Western Perspective,” Social Compass 51(1) (2005): 79.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Danièle Hervieu-Léger, Religion as a Chain of Memory (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000), 532.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Majed A. Ashy, “Health and Illness from an Islamic Perspective,” Journal of Religion and Health 38(3) (1999): 256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. See Jocelyne Cesari, Understanding the Arab Awakening: Islam, Modernity and Democracy (2013 forthcoming at Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2013 Jocelyne Cesari

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cesari, J. (2013). How Islam Questions the Universalism of Western Secularism. In: Why the West Fears Islam. Culture and Religion in International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137121202_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics