Abstract
Two and a half decades into the higher education civic engagement movement, as Dan Butin indicates in the Introduction to this book, there is concern that the movement has “stalled,” partly because of imprecise and conflicting language and compartmentalized networks and a remarkably “apolitical agenda.” In the view of this author, the “movement” has not exactly stalled. Rather, it has spread widely throughout higher education. Many campuses have service and/or service-learning centers. Service-learning is widespread in many disciplines. Membership in Campus Compact has grown to nearly 1200, and there is a proliferation of other organizations addressing civic engagement on every type of campus. Civic engagement has been “institutionalized” through accrediting requirements, a Carnegie Classification option, and a federal recognition program. Most recently, AAC&U and the Global Perspectives Institute have worked with the federal Department of Education to develop a report calling for more and better civic education of college students.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axelroth, R., & Dubb, S. (2010). The road half traveled: University engagement at a crossroads. College Park, MD: The Democracy Collaborative.
Bellah, R., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. (1985). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life. San Francisco, CA: University of California Press.
Bennet, W., & Nunn, S. (1998). A nation of spectators. Washington, D.C.: National Commission on Civic Renewal.
Boyte, H. (1991). Community service and civic education. Phi Delta Kappan, 765–67.
Colby, A., Beaumont, E., Ehrlich, T., & Corngold, J. (2007). Educating for demoracy: Preparing undergraduates for responsible political engagement. Stanford, CA: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Giles, D. & Eyler, J. (1994). The impact of a college community service laboratory on students’ personal, social, and cognitive outcomes. Journal of Adolescence, 17, 327–39.
Kretzmann, J., & McKnight, J. (1996). Assets-based community development. National Civic Review 85, 23–29.
Lyon-Callo, V. (2008). Inequality, policy, and neo-liberal governance. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Morton, K. (1995). The irony of service: Charity, project and social change in service-learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-learning, 2, 19–32.
Raill, S., & Hollander, E. (1996). How campuses can create engaged students: The student view. Journal of College & Character, 7 (1), 1–5.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Dan W. Butin and Scott Seider
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hollander, E.L. (2012). De Tocqueville Rediscovered: Community-Based Civic Engagement. In: Butin, D.W., Seider, S. (eds) The Engaged Campus. Community Engagement in Higher Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137113283_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137113283_12
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-0-230-33882-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-11328-3
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)