Advertisement

Diffracted Mediations: The Framing of Gender in the “War on Terror”

  • Krista Geneviève Lynes
Part of the Global Cinema book series (GLOBALCINE)

Abstract

In wrestling with the imagery of Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo, Anne McClintock posed the question, “How do we insist on seeing the violence that the imperial state attempts to render invisible, while also seeing the ordinary people afflicted by that violence?”1 What she identifies is a paradox of visual culture in conflict zones: that an exposure of the spectacle of wartime media coverage may render a more grounded perspective impossible and—less obviously—that the converse might also be true. Historically, grounded visions have sought to flesh out the cost of war and the immediacy of conflict, and have played an important role in shattering the singular views of the war presented on either side of the conflict. Multiple and fragmentary visions on the ground of conflict zones may work to counter the consolidation of wartime power (which draws heavily on iconic images and mythical forms of speech), demonstrating acts of solidarity with nascent resistance movements and drawing transnational attention to local political actions. Such visions may also confirm (and allegorize) the binary oppositions within a conflict zone, however, and thus contribute either to a resurgent nationalism (on either side) or to the rendering of absolutist subject positions. The immediacy of grassroots media, and their distribution through the networks of new media platforms, may electrify distant (and differently) located publics just as they may repeat the mythical speech of top-down media forms. What critical tools exist, then, to parse the expanded field of visual culture and, particularly, its role in visualizing contemporary conflict zones?

Keywords

Young Girl Muslim Woman Camera Phone Conflict Zone Visual Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 2.
    Robert Stam, “Mobilizing Fictions: The Gulf War, the Media, and the Recruitment of the Spectator,” Public Culture 4, no. 2 (Spring 1992): 102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 3.
    Finbarr Barry Flood, “Between Cult and Culture: Bamiyan, Islamic Icon-oclasm, and the Museum,” Art Bulletin LXXXIV, no. 4 (December 2002): 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 11.
    Saskia Sassen, Globalization and Its Discontents (New York: The New Press, 1998), 177.Google Scholar
  4. 12.
    Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1981), 46.Google Scholar
  5. 16.
    Andreas Huyssen, “Nostalgia for Ruins,” Grey Room 23 (Spring 2006): 6–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 23.
    Malek Alloula, The Colonial Harem, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1986).Google Scholar
  7. 25.
    Hamid Naficy, An Accented Cinema: Exilic and Diasporic Filmmaking (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001), 10.Google Scholar
  8. 26.
    Bert Cardullo, “An Afghan Is a Woman,” The Hudson Review 58, no. 2 (Summer 2005): 302.Google Scholar
  9. 30.
    Gilles Deleuze, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2003), 33.Google Scholar
  10. 38.
    Sandra Schäfer, Stagings. Kabul, Film & Production of Representation (Berlin: b_books, 2009).Google Scholar
  11. 39.
    Judith Butler, Precarious Life the Powers of Mourning and Violence (London: Verso, 2004), 146.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Krista Geneviève Lynes 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Krista Geneviève Lynes

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations