Skip to main content
  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

Film and mass culture are of interest because they represent aspects of everyday life and the part of the culture from below that makes it possible to understand how people cope with the deadlocks of power and repression and of exploitation. Film theory adds significantly to the theory of ideology, but a Žižekian analysis of cinema, rather than simply adding to film theory, is better suited to the critique of ideology One area where film analysis and the critique of ideology overlap is on the category of enjoyment. For Žižek, enjoyment, or jouissance, is a political problematic that is connected to ideology. By analyzing and interpreting enjoyment in cinema, Žižek adds to our understanding of enjoyment in ideology. A Žižekian analysis of cinema, while paying little attention to the specificity of the filmic medium, does develop a much stronger analysis of the mediation of ideology. This chapter introduces a Žižekian analysis of cinema that focuses on the production of enjoyment in spectatorship and in ideology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Colin MacCabe, “Realism and Cinema,” in Tracking the Signifier—Theoretical Essays: Film, Linguistics, Literature (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1985), 52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Slavoj Žižek, The Sublime Object of Ideology (London: Verso, 1989), 164.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. A.V. Miller (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Žižek, Organs without Bodies: Deleuze and Consequences (New York: Rout-ledge, 2004), 150.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fredric Jameson, The Seeds of Time (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), xii.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See David Bordwell, “A Case for Cognitivism,” Iris 9 (1989): 11–40, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jacques Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psychoanalysis (1963–64), trans. Alan Sheridan (New York: W. W. Norton, 1981), 34.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Žižek, For They Know Not What They Do: Enjoyment as a Political Factor, 2nd ed. (London: Verso, 2002), pp. 146–149;

    Google Scholar 

  9. and Žižek, Tarrying with the Negative: Kant, Hegel, and the Critique of Ideology (Durham: Duke University Press, 1993), p. 59.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Žižek, The Parallax View (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2006), 89.

    Google Scholar 

  11. A Žižek, The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology (London: Verso, 1999), 57.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Žižek, Defense of Lost Causes (London: Verso, 2008), 30.

    Google Scholar 

  13. On this point, see Renata Salecl, On Anxiety (New York: Routledge, 2004), and The Tyranny of Choice (London: Profile, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Slavoj Žižek, “The Spectre of Ideology,” in Mapping Ideology, ed. Slavoj Žižek (London: Verso, 1994), 4.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Žižek, Parallax View, 246–50; see also, Geoffrey Miller, The Mating Mind: How Sexual Choice Shaped the Evolution of Human Nature (London: Vintage, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jacques Lacan, Seminar II: The Ego in Freud’s Theory and in the Technique of Psychoanalysis (1954– 1955), trans. Sylvana Tomaselli (New York: W. W. Norton, 1988), 164.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Žižek. The Art of the Ridiculous Sublime: On David Lynch’s Lost Highway (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2000), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Žižek, The Metastases of Enjoyment: On Women and Causality (London: Verso, 1994), 101.

    Google Scholar 

  19. A Žižek, The Fright of Real Tears: Krzysztof Kieslowski between Theory and Post-Theory (London: BFI, 2001), 76.

    Google Scholar 

  20. See Laura Mulvey, “Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema,” in Film and Theory: An Anthology, eds. Toby Miller and Robert Stam (Oxford: Blackwell, 2000);

    Google Scholar 

  21. and Christian Metz, The Imaginary Signifier: Psychoanalysis and the Cinema, trans. Ben Brewster et al. (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1982).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2012 Matthew Flisfeder

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Flisfeder, M. (2012). Enjoyment in the Cinema. In: The Symbolic, the Sublime, and Slavoj Žižek’s Theory of Film. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137110749_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics