Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Perspectives in Comparative Politics ((PCP))

  • 448 Accesses

Abstract

The United States remains the only industrialized nation that does not provide universal health insurance. The passage of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) of 2010 brings the country closer to its peers, but in its own fashion. This is a far more limited role for government in health care than the health care models in other industrialized nations. Canada, for example, relies on a tax-financed single government insurance plan in each province. The single-payer insurance model, however, allows for primarily private providers. In the national health service of Britain and Sweden, the government’s role is even more extensive, financing health care from a single government insurance program and providing health care services from public clinics and hospitals. By contrast, American policymakers have taken steps to fill in coverage gaps through a dualistic model of private employment-based insurance and public insurance programs for those outside the labor market, namely, the elderly, poor, disabled, and the military. Germany’s statutory national health insurance based in employer and individual mandates perhaps comes closest to the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Donald L. Madison, “From Bismarck to Medicare—A Brief History of Medical Care Payment in America,” in The Social Medicine Reader: Health Policy, Markets and Medicine, 2nd ed., ed. Jonathan Oberlander, Larry R. Churchill, Sue E. Estroff, Gail E. Henderson, Nancy M. P. King, and Ronald P. Strauss (Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2005), pp. 54–59.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Deborah A. Stone, “The Struggle for the Soul of Health Insurance,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law (Summer 1993): 286–317; Thomas S. Bodenheimer and Kevin Grumbach, Understanding Health Policy: A Clinical Approach, 6th ed. (Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill, 2012), Chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Susan Starr Sered and Rushika Fernandopulle, Uninsured in America: Life and Death in the Land of Opportunity, updated edition (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2007), p. 114; Employer Health Benefits Survey 2011 (Kaiser Family Foundation and Health Research and Educational Trust, September 27, 2011). www.kff.org.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gregory Acs, Stephen H. Long, M. Susan Marquis, and Pamela Farley Short, “Self-Insured Employer Health Plans: Prevalence, Profile, Provisions, and Premiums,” Health Affairs 15 (2) (Summer 1996): 266–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Steve Jagler, “But Will It Work?” BizTimes Milwaukee, March 19-April 1, 2012. For example, Anthem Blue Cross of California announced in 2010 a 39 percent rate increase for individual and small group insurance. See Lawrence R. Jacobs and Theda Skocpol, Health Care Reform and American Politics: What Everyone Needs to Know (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2012), p. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  6. William G. Weissert and Carol S. Weissert, Governing Health: The Politics of Health Policy, 4th ed. (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2012), pp. 264–268; Bodenheimer and Grumbach, Understanding Health Policy, p. 13.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Paul Starr, The Social Transformation of American Medicine (New York: Basic Books, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jill S. Quadagno, One Nation Uninsured: Why the U.S. Has No National Health Insurance (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Starr, Social Transformation; Susan Giaimo, Markets and Medicine: The Politics of Health Care Reform in Britain, Germany, and the United States (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002), chaps. 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bodenheimer and Grumbach, Understanding Health Policy, p. 135 and chaps 4–5; Atul Gawande, “The Cost Conundrum,” The New Yorker, June 1, 2009; Miriam J. Laugesen and Sherry A. Glied, “Higher Fees Paid to US Physicians Drive Higher Spending for Physician Services Compared to Other Countries,” Health Affairs 30(9) (September 2011): 1647–1656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerald F. Anderson, Uwe E. Reinhardt, Peter S. Hussey, and Varduhi Petrosyan, “It’s the Prices, Stupid: Why the United States Is So Different from Other Countries,” Health Affairs 22(3) (May/June 2003): 89–105. Within the federal Department of Health and Human Services, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claimed the largest budget at $808 billion in 2011, whereas the Centers for Disease Control had only $6.3 billion (Weissert and Weissert, Governing Health, pp. 225–226).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. On political institutions as veto points, see Ellen M. Immergut, Health Politics: Interests and Institutions in Western Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), esp. pp. 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis. Interest Group Politics (Washington DC: CQ Press, 2002), chap 1

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leon D. Epstein, Political Parties in the American Mold (Madison and London: University of Wisconsin Press, 1986); Weissert and Weissert, Governing Health, pp. 174, 177–179.

    Google Scholar 

  15. See Steven Vogel, Freer Markets, More Rules (Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1996) on the neoliberal realignment.

    Google Scholar 

  16. For a discussion and examples of neoliberal critiques of education and social welfare policies, see John E. Chubb and Terry M. Moe, Politics, Markets, and America’s Schools (Washington DC: Brookings Institution, 1990)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Charles Murray, Losing Ground: American Social Policy, 1950–1980 (New York: Basic Books, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jason DeParle, American Dream: Three Women, Ten Kids, and a Nation’s Drive to End Welfare (New York: Viking, 2004), esp. Chap. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paul Pierson, “When Effect Becomes Cause: Policy Feedback and Political Change,” World Politics 45 (1993): 595–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mollyann Brody and Robert J. Blendon, “Public Opinion and Health Policy,” in Health Politics and Policy, 4th ed., ed. James A. Morone, Theodore A. Litman, and Leonard S. Robins (Clifton Park, NY: Delmar Cengage, 2008), pp. 249–270; Madison, “From Bismarck to Medicare.”

    Google Scholar 

  21. Theodore R. Marmor, The Politics of Medicare. 2nd ed. (New York: Aidine de Gruyter, 2000); Quadagno, One Nation Uninsured.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jacob S. Hacker, The Road to Nowhere: The Genesis of President Clinton’s Plan for Health Security (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997), pp. 17–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Theda Skocpol, Boomerang: Clinton’s Health Security Effort and the Turn against Government in U.S. Politics (New York and London: W. W. Norton, 1996). Skocpol, Boomerang, pp. 13, 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Alain C. Enthoven, Health Plan: The Only Practical Solution to the Soaring Cost of Medical Care (Boston: Addis on-Wesley, 1980); “Managed Competition: An Agenda for Action,” Health Affairs 1 (3) (1988): 25–47.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Robert J. Blendon, Mollyann Brodie, John M. Benson, Drew E. Altman, Larry Levitt, Tina Hoff and Larry Hugick, “Understanding the Managed Care Backlash,” Health Affairs 17 (4) (1998): pp. 80–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Susan Giaimo, “Behind the Scenes of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act: The Making of a Health Care Co-op,” Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 38 (3) (June 2013): 599–610. Congress cut co-op funding in 2012, so that only 23 cooperatives were actually established. “Your Health Plan Will Now Self-Destruct,” Businessweek, November 2–8, 2015, pp. 28–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Stuart Altman and David Shactman, Power, Politics, and Universal Health Care: The Inside Story of a Century-Long Battle (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 2011), Chap. 12, esp. 254–255.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacob S. Hacker, “Putting Politics First,” Health Affairs 27 (3) (May/June 2008): 718–723; “The Case for Public Plan Choice in National Health Reform: Key to Cost Control and Quality Coverage,” Berkeley, CA: Center on Health, Economic and Family Security, University of California School of Law, and Institute for America’s Future, n.d. www.law.berkeley.edu/chefs.htm. Downloaded May 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. This section draws on the summary of the CARE Act (The Patient Choice, Affordability, Responsibility, and Empowerment Act: A Legislative Proposal January 2014); and Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, “Beyond Repeal-A Republican Proposal for Health Care Reform,” New England Journal of Medicine, 370 (10) (March 6, 2014): 894–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Susan Giaimo

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giaimo, S. (2016). The United States: An Ambivalent Journey toward Universal Coverage. In: Reforming Health Care in the United States, Germany, and South Africa. Perspectives in Comparative Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137107176_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics