Advertisement

The YouTube Prioress: Anti-Semitism and Twenty-First Century Participatory Culture

  • Candace Barrington
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

For most twenty-first century American parents and schoolteachers, Chaucer’s fourteenth-century Canterbury Tales does not easily fit their notions of suitable literature for children, and the fit does not become much easier for their notions of what teens should read. Besides Chaucer’s undeniably alien English verse, the content of the tales poses a problem for presenting them to young readers. Many of his tales are forthrightly indecorous, featuring adultery, thievery, violence, sex, and—to the horror of parents and the delight of the younger set—farting. More problematic, however, are the tales presenting values incongruent with many contemporary values. How should young readers be introduced to such characters as Griselda or Constance, who suffer greatly rather than disobey their husbands? And how do we explain Virginia, who is beheaded by her father to prevent her rape by an unscrupulous judge?

Keywords

Young Reader Digital Storytelling Helicopter Parenting British Poetry Student Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    James T. Fields and Edwin P. Whipple, eds., The Family Library of British Poetry, from Chaucer to the Present Time (1350–1878) (Boston: Riverside Press, 1878), 9–11.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Katharine Lee Bates, Chaucer’s Canterbury Pilgrims (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1903);Google Scholar
  3. F. J. Harvey Darton, Tales of the Canterbury Pilgrims: Retold from Chaucer and Others (London: Wells, Gardner, Darton, 1904);Google Scholar
  4. Eleanor Farjeon, Tales from Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales (New York: Jonathan Cape and Harrison Smith, 1930);Google Scholar
  5. Ada Hales, Stories from Chaucer (London: Methuen, 1911);Google Scholar
  6. E. C. Oakden and M. Sturt, The Canterbury Pilgrims: Being Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales Retold for Children (London: Dent, 1923);Google Scholar
  7. Eva March Tappan, The Chaucer Story Book (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1908).Google Scholar
  8. 5.
    Seth Lerer, “Major Works, Major Issues: The Canterbury Tales,” in The Yale Companion to Chaucer, ed. Seth Lerer (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2006), 277.Google Scholar
  9. 6.
    Peggy A. Knapp, “Chaucer for Fun and Profit,” in Teaching Chaucer, ed. Gail Ashton and Louise Sylvester (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 17–29;Google Scholar
  10. Steven F. Kruger, “A Series of Linked Assignments for the Undergraduate Course on Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales,” in Teaching Chaucer, ed. Gail Ashton and Louise Sylvester (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007), 30–45.Google Scholar
  11. 7.
    John Hartley, The Uses of Digital Literacy (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 2011), 104–9.Google Scholar
  12. 9.
    E. D. Hirsch Jr., The Knowledge Deficit: Closing the Shocking Education Gap for American Children (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2006), 79.Google Scholar
  13. 10.
    Lee Patterson, “The Disenchanted Classroom,” Exemplaria 8.2 (1996): 513–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    John H. Bushman and Kay Parks Haas, Using Young Adult Literature in the English Classroom (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, 2006), 172–75.Google Scholar
  15. 14.
    Patrick Lowenthal, “Digital Storytelling in Education: An Emerging Institutional Technology,” in Story Circle: Digital Storytelling Around the World (Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009), 252–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales, trans. Nevill Coghill (London: Penguin, 1951);Google Scholar
  17. Geoffrey Chaucer, The Canterbury Tales: A Prose Version in Modern English, trans. David Wright (New York: Random House, 1964).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Amanda Lotz, The Television Will be Revolutionized (New York: New York University Press, 2007), 252.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jean Burgess, YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture (Cambridge, UK: Polity, 2009), 38–39 and fn1.Google Scholar
  20. 25.
    Karen F. Gracy, “Moving Image Preservation and Cultural Capital,” Library Trends 56.1 (2007): 184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Gail Ashton and Daniel T. Kline 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Candace Barrington

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations