Advertisement

The Medieval Entertainment Channel: The Shrek Quartet

  • Kathleen Coyne Kelly
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

For the past several years, whenever I teach Chaucer’s “Wife of Bath’s Tale” (ca. 1385), students say, “it’s like Shrek.”1 At a cultural moment in which everything is available everywhere at once, what we formerly thought of as a unidirectional (that is, chronological) arrow of influence and allusion has morphed into a matrix of multiplying and constantly reorganizing relations and affinities. Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz), by day beautiful, human, and white,2 and by night ugly, ogre, and green, is a Loathly Lady analogue that people encounter in the realm of pop culture before meeting, if ever meeting, her medieval sisters. Fiona and the Loathly Lady live in what Mikhail Bakhtin calls “great time”: in which cultural productions break through the boundaries of their historical moment, and, I would add, swirl around in a kaleidoscope of new, never to be repeated, patterns.3

Keywords

Fairy Tale Fairy Godmother Ideological State Apparatus Cultural Moment Queer History 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 3.
    M. M. Bahktin, “Response to a Question from the Novy Mir Editorial Staff,” in Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. Vern W. McGee and ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986), 1–9.Google Scholar
  2. 5.
    Amy Kaufman, “Medieval Unmoored,” Studies in Medievalism 19 (2010): 4.Google Scholar
  3. 6.
    Nickolas Haydock, “Medievalism and Excluded Middles,” Studies in Medievalism 18 (2010): 19.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Bruno Latour, We Have Never Been Modern, trans. Catherine Porter (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    Judith Halberstam, In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives (New York: New York University Press, 2005), 3.Google Scholar
  6. 9.
    Elizabeth Freeman, Introduction to “Queer Temporalities,” GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 13.2–3 (2007): 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 12.
    Jean Baudrillard, Simulacra and Simulation, trans. Sheila Faria Glaser (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002), 12.Google Scholar
  8. 14.
    Alexander Doty, Making Things Perfectly Queer: Interpreting Mass Culture (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1993), 3–4.Google Scholar
  9. 17.
    Vito Russo, The Celluloid Closet: Homosexuality in the Movies (New York: Harper and Row, 1987).Google Scholar
  10. 18.
    Patricia White, Uninvited: Classic Hollywood Cinema and Lesbian Representability (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1999).Google Scholar
  11. 19.
    Roland Barthes, Criticism and Truth, trans. and ed. Katrine Pilcher Keuneman (London: Athlone Press, 1987), 70–72.Google Scholar
  12. 24.
    Louis Althusser, “Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses (Notes towards an Investigation),” in Lenin and Philosophy and Other Essays, trans. Ben Brewster (London: Monthly Review Press, 1972), 127–242.Google Scholar
  13. 25.
    Jacques Derrida, Of Grammatology, trans. Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak (Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1997), 153.Google Scholar
  14. 28.
    Laurie Finke and Martin Shichtman, Cinematic Illuminations: The Middle Ages on Film, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009), 15.Google Scholar
  15. 30.
    Linda Hutcheon, A Theory of Parody: The Teachings of Twentieth-Century Art Forms (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1985), xii.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Gail Ashton and Daniel T. Kline 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathleen Coyne Kelly

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations