Abstract
The study of institutional change has always been a topic of economics, political science, and sociology. The study of the internal logic of institutional change is of great theoretical and practical importance, attempting to identify the influencing factors and the extent of impact as well as to track institutional change. The factors that influence institutional change are varied, but right is one of the most important variables from the perspective of both organizational and group rights. A tool to safeguard rights and interests is needed, and recall behavior is the most effective means. I try revealing the internal logic of institutional change by studying recall behavior and the emergence of the rights remedy in three social organizations. This finding is different from previous research findings and helps to expand the vision of academic studies and increase the knowledge of the internal logic of institutional change.
An earlier version of this chapter was presented at the new political economics seminar at Zhejiang University in September 2006. I am particularly grateful for helpful comments from Professor Zhenghan Cao. The materials have been collected by Yulin Sun, a graduate I supervised at Beijing Normal University.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Chen, Hongcai. 2007. “Right Remedy and Harmonious Society: Inherent Logic and Its System Innovation.” Journal of the Party School of the CPC Zhejiang Provincial Committee, 1.
Huang, Shaoan. 1999. “Hypothesis on Role Change of Institutional Change Subject and Its Interpretation to Chinese System Transformation.” Economic Research Journal, 1.
Li, Qiugao. 2007. “Study on Impeachment System Elements.” Seeker, 6.
North, Douglass. C. 1997. Structure and Change in Economic History. Chen Yu trans. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
Pan, Xianghui. 2010. “On Dynamic Mechanism of China Media System Changes and a Four-Dimensional Model.” Journal of Zhejiang Institute of Medial Communications, 5.
Shuai, Hen. 2011. “The Necessity of Checks and Balances of Right from a Recalling Incident in Resident Committee.” Citizen Guide, 1.
Tang, Juan. 2001. “The Institution Analysis of Local Government’s Governance Change.” Theory and Reform, 4.
Wang, Xin, and Fang Li. 2011. “The History in the System: Reflect on Institutional Change.” Comparative Economic and Social Systems, 2.
Xu, Jialiang. 2011. Introduction on Social Organization. Beijing: China Social Press.
Yang, Ruilong. 2000. “Institutional Change among Diffusion and Local Government’s Innovative Activity.” Case Study of Chinese Institutional Change, 2nd ed. Beijing: China Financial and Economic Press.
Yi, Cong. 2002. “Reasons and Performance Industrial Institution Change: A Positive Investigation of Chinese CPA Industry.” Doctoral Dissertation in Ji Nan University, guided by Hu Jun.
Yue, Yezhu, and Qi Liu. 2003. “The Function of Association in Institutional Change of China’s Market Economy.” Social Science Journal, 2.
Zhang, Xuguang. 2002. “The Villagers Voluntarily Recalled the Village Officer in Shui Xin Village.” Data Communication, 10.
Zheng, Jie. 2009. “Initial Research of Right Remedy Question in the Process of Volunteer Activity.” Legal Master Thesis in Suzhou University, guided by Liu Guanghua.
Zheng, Yefu. 2001. “Trust and Social Order.” Academic Forum, 4.
Zhou, Liwen. 2007. “The Research of Fundamental Theory of the Right Remedy System.” Master Thesis in North China University of Technology, guided by Liu Zejun.
Zhou, Xueguang, and Yun Ai. 2010. “Multiple Logics in Institutional Change: Toward an Analytical Framework.” Social Science in China, 4.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2012 Jianxing Yu and Sujian Guo
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Xu, J. (2012). Recall Behavior and Right Remedy: The Internal Logic of Institutional Change—A Case Study of Three Social Organizations. In: Yu, J., Guo, S. (eds) Civil Society and Governance in China. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137092496_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137092496_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34376-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-09249-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)