Abstract
What follows is an exercise in theory, nothing more. The theory in question is onē I proposed 30 years ago in a book entitled Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period.1 There, I maintainēd that quantitative measures of diffusion developed to describe the spread of (primarily material) innovations in the twentieth century could be used to model the pace and intensity of the religious conversion that led to a majority Muslim society in the lands conquered by the Arabs in the seventh century CE. In subsequent publications, I added to or elaborated on the theory in minor ways, but I did not try to apply it outside of Islamic history.2 The object of this chapter is to advance a hypothetical application to the early spread of Christianity. My interest here, as in my book, is not in demonstrating the unchallengeable correctnēss or precision of the quantitative method. That will always remain a matter of debate. Rather, I am interested in using the method tentatively and heuristically to pose and possibly answer questions that could not easily be formulated without the hypothesis. In honor of Professor Modarressi’s contributions to the field of Islamic law, the particular question I will address is whether the elaboration of law occurs at a particular stage in the quantitative growth of a faith community.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Richard Bulliet, Conversion to Islam in the Medieval Period: An Essay in Quantitative History (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979), 16–32.
Richard Bulliet, “Conversion-Based Patronage and Onomastic Evidence,” in Patronate and Patronage in Early and Classical Islam, ed. Monique Bernards and John Nawas (Leiden: Brill, 2005), 246–62.
Richard Bulliet, Cotton, Climate, and Camels in Early Islamic Iran (New York: Columbia University Press, 2009), 31–32.
For a recent elaboration of this point in the case of Islam, see Fred Donnēr, Muhammad and the Believers (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010).
The figures cited may be found in Richard Bulliet, Islam: The View from the Edge (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), 93–94.
For legal issues relating to Zoroastrians in Iran, see Jean De Menasce, “Problèmes des Mazdéens dans l’Iran musulman,” in Festschrift für Wilhelm Eilers. ed. Gernot Wiessnēr (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1967).
B. T. Anklesaria, The Pahlavi Rivayat of Aturfarnbag and Farnbag-srosh (Bombay: Industrial Press, 1969).
For examples of how logistic curves have been used in modern times, see Everett M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1962).
Robert L. Hamblin, R. Brooke Jacobsen, and Jerry L. L. Miller discuss the genēral validity of analysis by means of logistic curves and the history of their use in A Mathematical Theory of Social Change (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1973).
Keith Hopkins, A World Full of Gods: The Strange Triumph of Christianity (New York: Free Press, 2000), 82.
Hopkins, Triumph of Christianity, 84. The publications he cites in support of this and the previous estimate are Adolf von Harnack, The Expansion of Christianity (London, 1904).
Rodney Stark, The Rise of Early Christianity (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996); and his own article “Christian Number and Its Implications,” Journal of Early Christian Studies 6 (1998): 185ff. Stark deploys a theory of exponential growth similar to the one being used here.
Glen W. Bowersock, Julian the Apostate (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1978), 79–93.
The Apostolic Canons, trans. Henry R. Percival, available onlinē at http://www.voskrese.info/spl/aposcanon.html, accessed July 1, 2009. For a published version in hard copy, see Les 127 Canons des Apôtres [Apostolic Canons], ed. and trans. (French) Jean Périer and Augustin Périer (Paris: Firmin-Didot, 1912), or Die Kanonēs der wichtigsten altkirchlichen Concilien, nēbst den Apostolischen Kanones, ed. Friedrich Lauchert (Freiburg and Leipzig: Mohr, 1896).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Michael Cook, Najam Haider, Intisar Rabb, and Asma Sayeed
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bulliet, R.W. (2013). Conversion and Law: A Muslim-Christian Comparison. In: Cook, M., Haider, N., Rabb, I., Sayeed, A. (eds) Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137078957_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137078957_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29507-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07895-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)