Abstract
In the Muslim tradition few prophets traveled with the speed—and none in the grand style with his entire court—of King Solomon, who was not only a revered prophet but also a universal ruler. The very sober and conservative scholar Baghawï (d. 510/1117 or 516/1122) quotes one of the earliest Qurʾān commentators, Muqātil b. Sulaymān (d. 153/770), who describes Solomon’s mode of transportation as follows:
The satans wove a carpet one parasang square for Solomon out of gold and silk, and they placed for him there in the middle of the carpet a pulpit of gold. Around it were three thousand seats of gold and silver, the prophets sitting on the seats of gold and the men of religious learning on the seats of silver, and around them were the jinn and satans. The birds with their wings gave Solomon shade so no sun fell upon him. The morning wind that blows from the East would raise the carpet so that it would travel a month’s journey from the morning to the afternoon, and [an equal trip] from the afternoon to the morning.1
I am sincerely grateful for bibliographic help from Professor Hossein Kamaly, for some wise emails from Professor David Stronach, for thoughtful advice from Professor Abbas Amanat on an early version, for advice on Middle Persian languages from Daniel Sheffield, for invaluable advice in the archaeological literature from Professor Donald Whitcomb, and for deeply informed advice from Dr. Sarah Savant, who is writing a book on a similar theme.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Baghawī, Maʿālim al-tanzil (Riyadh: Dār al-Tiba, 1993), 21:81. A parasang is about three miles. Satans are a subcategory of jinn, the alternate creation to mankind and, like humans, subject to judgment of heaven or hell.
Al-Haysam b. Muhammad Būshanjī, Qisas al-Qurʾān al-Karīm (Amman: n.p., 2006), 470. Some scholars date Būshanjī to the early fifth/eleventh century.
Thaʿlabī, Arāʾis al-majālis, trans. William M. Brinner (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2002), 492.
Antoine Borrut, “La Syrie de Salomon,” Pallas 43 (2003), 112.
Yāqūt, Muʿjam al-buldān, ed. F. Wuestenfeld (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1886), 1:684.
Thaʿālibī, Thimār al-qulūb (Cairo: DārNahdatMisr, 1965), 17.
See the excellent article by Priscilla Souchek, “Solomon’s Throne/Solomon’s Bath,” Ars orientalis 23 (1993), 109–36.
Ibn Battūta, Travels in Asia and Africa, trans. H. A. R. Gibb (London: G. Routledge, 1939), 180.
Ahmad Iqtidārī, Khūzistān (Tehran: Anjuman-i Asār-i Millī, 1359/1980), 7.
Assadullah Souren Melikian-Chirvani, “Le royaume de Salomon,” Le Monde Iranien et l’Islam 1 (1971), 18.
Tabarī, Jāmiʿ al-bayān (Cairo: Mustafā al-Bābī al-Halabī, 1954), 17:55.
A. D. H. Bivar and Mary Boyce, “Estakr,” Encyclopaedia Iranica, viewed online May 30, 2011.
Masʿūdī, Murūj al-dhahab (Beirut: al-Jāmiʿa al-Lubnāniyya, 1966), 2:399–400.
Masʿudī, Livre de l’avertissement et de la revision (Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1896), 150–51.
Ibn al-Nadīm, The Fihrist, ed. and trans. Bayard Dodge (New York: Columbia University Press, 1970), 574.
Philippe Gignoux, Le livre d’Ardā Vīrāz (Paris: Editions recherche sur les civilisations, 1984), 145–46. Middle Persianists now would transliterate the name Papag as Pabag. The customary form of this name in the Shāhnāma is Pāpak. Middle Persianists would also render bad-bakht as wad-baxt.
Muqaddasī, Best Divisions for Knowledge of the Regions, trans. Basil Collins (Reading: Garnet, 2001), 36.
Bīrūnī, Chronology of the Ancient Nations, trans. C. E. Sachau (London: Oriental Translation Fund, 1879), 127, with some modifications by this author; Kitāb al-āthār al-baqiya [Chronologie orientalischer Völker] (Leipzig: Brockhaus, 1878), 129.
Mahdi Moradi-Jalal, Siamak Arianfar, Bryan Karney, and Andrew Colombo, “Water Resource Management for Iran’s Persepolis Complex,” in Ancient Water Technologies, ed. Larry W. Mays (Dordrecht: Springer, 2010), 87–102.
E. W. Lane, An Arabic-English Lexicon (London: Williams and Norgate, 1877), 6:2353, with references to the classical lexicons.
Josef Wiesehoefer, Ancient Persia (London: I. B. Tauris, 1996), 226.
Dīnawarī, al-Akhbār al-tiwāl, ed. Vladimir Guirgass (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1888), 9. Jam is a common alternate for Jamshīd because the latter means “Jam-the Shining.”
Ibn al-Balkhī, The Fārsnāma (London: Luzac, 1921), 26.
Anon., Mujmalal-tavārīkh, ed. M. Bahār (Tehran: Muʾassasa-yi Khāvar, 1318), 38.
Dīnawarī, al-Akhbār al-tiwāl (Beirut: Daral-Kutub al-ʿIlmiyya, 2001), 32.
Manūchihr Murtazavī, Maktab-i Hāfiz (Tabriz: Sitūda, 1370), 225. In the Shāhnāma, it is the legendary king Kaykhusraw (and not Jamshīd) who possesses the world-viewing cup. In later Persian poetry the cup is almost universally attributed to Jamshīd.
Muhammad Qazvīnī, Mamdūhin-i Shaykh Saʿdi (Tehran: Vizārat-i Maʿārif, 1317).
Saʿdī, Kulliyāt, ed. Bahāʾ al-Dīn Khurramshāhī (Tehran: Intishārāt-i Nāhīd, 1379), 28.
Adel T. Adamova, “The St. Petersburg Illustrated Shahnama of 733 Hijra (1333 AD) and the Injuid School of Painting,” in The Visual Language of the Persian Book of Kings, ed. Robert Hillenbrand (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2004), 58.
See Pierofranceso Callieri, “At the Roots of the Sasanian Royal Imagery: The Persepolis Graffiti,” in Eran ud Aneran: Studies Presented to Boris Ilic Marshak (Venezia: Cafoscarina, 2006), 129–48, especially p. 138.
Vesta Sarkhosh Curtis, “The Legacy of Ancient Persia,” in The Forgotten Empire, ed. John E. Curtis and Nigel Tallis (London: British Museum Press, 2005), 252.
John J. Donahue, “Three Buwayhid Inscriptions,”Arabica 20, no. 1 (1973), 74–80 on the inscription and the Zoroastrian priest named in ʿAdud al-Dawla’s second inscription.
Muhammad Taqī Mustafavī, Iqlim-i Fārs (Tehran: Anjuman-i Āsār-i Millī, 1343), 346–47.
For Davānī, see Vladimir Minorsky, “A Civil and Military Review in Fars in 881/1476,” Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 10, no. 1 (1939), corrected here on the basis of Iraj Afshar’s excellent edition of Davānī, “Arz-i Sipāh-i Uzun Hasan,” Majalla-yi dānishkada-yi adabiyyāt 3, no. 3 (Tehran: Farvardīn, 1325), 26–55.
Ebba Koch, Mughal Art and Imperial Ideology (New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2001).
Pierre Briant, Alexandre le Grand (Paris: Presses universitaires de France, 1977), 96.
Richard Frye, “Papak,” Encyclopaedia Iranica, viewed online May 3, 2011.
Marie-Louise Chaumont, “L’inscription de Kartir à la Kaʿbah de Zoroastre,” Journal Asiatique (1960), 339–80.
See also the more recent synoptic edition of this inscription by D. N. MacKenzie, “Kerdir’s Inscription,” in Georgina Herrmann, The Sasanian Rock Reliefs at Naqsh-i Rustam (Berlin: Dietrich Reimer Verlag, 1989), 35–72.
Tabarī, Taʾrīkh (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1965), 1:986.
Tabarī, The Conquest of Iran, trans. G. Rex Smith (Albany: SUNY Press, 1994), 285 and note 667.
Muʿjam asmāʾ al-ʿArab, ed. Muḥammad b. al-Zubayr (Beirut: Maktab Lubnān, 1991), 1:827.
Balādhurī, Ansābal-ashrāf (Damascus: Dāral-Yaqzaal-ʿArabiyya, 1997), 213.
Sulayman Bashir, Arabs and Others in Early Islam (Princeton: Darwin Press, 1997), 76.
Thaʿālibī, Ghurar al-siyar (Paris: Imprimerie nationale, 1900), 4.
Dimitri Gutas, Greek Thought, Arabic Culture (New York: Routledge, 1998).
Ibn al-Balkhī, Fārsnāmah. trans. Guy Le Strange, Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society (1912), 137.
Isaac Newton, Chronology (London: J. Tonson, 1728).
Maqdisī, Kitāb al-Badʾ wa-ʾl-taʾrīkh (Paris: Leroux, 1918), 3:106.
Carsten Colpe, “Syncretism,” in The Encyclopedia of Religion, ed. Mircea Eliade (New York: Macmillan, 1987), 14:218–27.
For a different but important critique of Colpe, see Fritz Graf, “Syncretism (Further Considerations),” in Encyclopedia of Religion, 2nd ed., ed. Lindsay Jones (New York: Macmillan, 2004), 13:8934–38, viewed online May 28, 2011.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2013 Michael Cook, Najam Haider, Intisar Rabb, and Asma Sayeed
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mottahedeh, R.P. (2013). The Eastern Travels of Solomon: Reimagining Persepolis and the Iranian Past. In: Cook, M., Haider, N., Rabb, I., Sayeed, A. (eds) Law and Tradition in Classical Islamic Thought. Palgrave Series in Islamic Theology, Law, and History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137078957_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137078957_13
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29507-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07895-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)