Abstract
When in 1922 Karel Čapek wrote Factory for the Absolute it was still possible to poke fun at the chiliastic atmosphere of post-World War I Europe. It was a time when redemptive faiths could be had by the dozen, when new messiahs were being unveiled in every political quarter, but when, from the relatively peaceful haven of Czechoslovakia’s First Republic, a violent struggle among them did not as yet appear imminent. Čapek’s novel, culminating in an apocalyptic war of all against all, was set in the year 1943; he was too optimistic by a decade. By the early 1930s, there was nothing to laugh about. With economic depression, the ever-increasing polarization of politics along class and national lines, and most ominously of all, the rise of Nazism in Germany, Čapek’s darkest imaginings of a world torn apart by rival visions of the absolute seemed to be on the brink of realization. In this worrying environment, Čapek urged his countrymen with more vehemence than ever to recognize the relativity of their own values and to accept the legitimacy of beliefs and perspectives other than their own. It was the only antidote, he warned, to the poisonous conflicts that threatened to tear apart Czechoslovakia as a state and enfeeble it in the face of external aggression.
The desultory state of the world today and of its political affairs can be defined as the epistemological crisis of European civilization.
—Karel Čapek, 19341
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
René Wellek, “Karel Čapek,” in The Columbia Dictionary of Modern European Literature, ed. Horatio Smith (New York: Columbia University Press, 1947), 139.
Karel Čapek, “O té státotvornosti,” OUKIII, 293. Originally published in Přítomnost, February 3, 1932. Čapek does not mention Benda by name in this article, but there can be no doubt about the reference or about Čapek’s familiarity with his work. In Čapek’s Conversations with Masaryk (1928–1935), Benda’s Treason of the Intellectuals (1927) was a topic of discussion between him and Masaryk. See Karel Čapek, Hovory s T G Masarykem (Prague: Československý spisovatel, 1990), 329–32.
See Robert Musil, The Man without Qualities, trans. Sophie Wilkins (New York: Knopf, 1995), 30.
William Harkins, Karel Čapek (New York: Columbia University Press, 1962), 116.
See Květoslav Chvatík and Zdeněk Pešat, Poetismus (Prague: Odeon, 1967).
See Viktor Kudělka, Boje o Karla Čapka (Prague: Academia, 1987), 39–40.
F. X. Šalda cited in Ivan Klíma, Karel Čapek: Life and Work, trans. Norma Comrada (North Haven, CT: Catbird Press, 2002), 134–35.
From right to left, beginning with the Czech and Czechoslovak parties, the coalition included the Czech National Democrats, the Czech Small Traders, the Czech Populists, the Czechoslovak Agrarians, the Czechoslovak National Socialists, the Czechoslovak Social Democrats, the German Farmer and DAWG, and the German Social Democrats. Joseph Rothschild, East Central Europe between the Two World Wars (Seattle and London: University of Washington Press, 1974), 116–17.
Josef Branžovský, Karel Čapek, světový názor a umění (Prague: Nakladatelství politické literatury 1963), 183.
Bedřich Golombek, “Podkarpatská tragédie ze soudního přelícení,” reprinted in its entirety in Karel Čapek, Hordubal, Povětroň, Obyčejný život (Prague: Československý spisovatel, 1985), 407–8.
Henri Bergson, Creative Evolution, trans. Arthur Mitchell (New York: Random House, 1944), 181–82. Emphasis in original.
William Harkins, introduction, Three Novels (unpaginated); Harkins, Karel Čapek, 137–38; Harkins , “Karel Čapek: From Relativism to Perspectivism,” History of Ideas Newsletter, 3 (1957): 50–53.
See José Ortega y Gasset, The Modern Theme, trans. James Cleugh (London: C. W. Daniel, 1931) and
Karl Mannheim, Ideology and Utopia, trans. Louis Wirth and Edward Shils (New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1936). On the relationship of Ortega and Mannheim’s thought, see
Robert Wohl, The Generation of 1914 (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979). Mannheim’s theory is sometimes known as relationism rather than perspectivism.
Henri Bergson, An Introduction to Metaphysics, trans. by Arthur Mitchell (New York: Random House, 1944), 24–25.
Although Čapek’s father was a doctor and not a cabinetmaker, the descriptions of the ordinary man’s parents closely mirror Čapek’s own statements about his parents as well as his sister’s account in her memoirs. See Karel Čapek, “Jak jsem k tomu přišel,” OUKIII, 338–40 (originally published in Lumír 58 (1932)), and Helena Čapková, Moji milí bratři (Prague: Československý spisovatel, 1962). An Ordinary Life has long been recognized to contain many autobiographical elements.
Copyright information
© 2013 Thomas Ort
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ort, T. (2013). The Self as Empty Space and Crowd: Karel Čapek and the Czechoslovak Condition. In: Art and Life in Modernist Prague. Palgrave Studies in Cultural and Intellectual History. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137077394_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137077394_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29532-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-07739-4
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)