Advertisement

Girlindis and Alpais: Telling the Lives of two Textile Fabricators in the Carolingian Empire

  • Valerie L. Garver
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

High status did not guarantee queens, abbesses, and other elite women, anymore than servile women, a place in the surviving texts from the Carolingian Empire.1 As others have emphasized in this volume already, traditional biography is only rarely a way to tell the stories of medieval women, even more so Carolingian women.2 This chapter will trace a picture of two women, Girlindis and Alpais, who lived in the western part of the Carolingian Empire in the ninth century and who fabricated textiles, a crucial activity of Frankish women of every status. Medievalists have only recently come to appreciate the importance of textiles in the early Middle Ages, and few have recognized the prominence of cloth in the Carolingian world, largely due to the paucity of textiles that survive from that time and place. Given the silence of our sources about both individual women and cloth fabrication, learning about Alpais and Girlindis as individuals proves impossible. Examination of a wide variety of sources, both material and textual, allows for a glimpse of their possible experiences even when they do not pertain directly to the women in question. Archaeology, for instance, helps to illuminate the life of Girlindis while examining family members aids in learning about Alpais.3 Previous inattention makes it all the more desirable to examine these two textile fabricators as well as a surviving piece one produced.

Keywords

Textile Work Ninth Century Elite Woman Gold Thread Spindle Whorl 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Dhuoda, author of a handbook for her son, is perhaps the most well-known female writer of the Carolingian era, but she is not mentioned in any other Carolingian source save her own. Liber manualis, in Dhuoda, Handbook for Her Warrior Son, trans. and ed. Marcelle Thiébaux (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998). See also Janet L. Nelson, “Dhuoda,” in Lay Intellectuals in the Carolingian World, ed. Patrick Wormald and Janet L. Nelson (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007), pp. 106–120.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emma, wife of Einhard, the biographer of Charlemagne, has been the subject of a brief biographical sketch in connection with her husband. Julia M. H. Smith, “Einhard: the Sinner and the Saints,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society 13 (2003): 55–77. Scholars have sometimes been able to study the remaining textual evidence for some Anglo-Saxon and Frankish queens, abbesses, and female saints to great effect.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 2.
    See, e.g., Janet L. Nelson, “Queens as Jezebels: The Careers of Brunhild and Balthild in Merovingian History,” in Medieval Women, ed. Derek Baker (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1978), pp. 31–77Google Scholar
  4. 2.
    Pauline Stafford, Queen Emma and Queen Edith: Queenship and Women’s Power in Eleventh-Century England (Oxford: Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Some scholars have produced studies of early medieval women by discussing their families or by employing material evidence related to them, such as manuscripts, art, architecture, and archaeological remains. A prominent example is the Byzantine princess Theophanu who married into the Ottonian family that ruled German lands in the tenth and eleventh centuries. See, e.g., Gunther Wolf, ed., Kaiserin Theophanu. Prinzessin aus der Fremde des Westreichs grosse Kaiserin (Cologne: Böhlau Verlag, 1991)Google Scholar
  6. 3.
    Anton von Euw and Peter Schreiner, eds., Kaiserin Theophanu. Begegnung des Ostens und Westens um die Wende des ersten Jahrtausends. Gedenkschrift des Kölner Schnütgen-Museums zum 1000. Todesjahr der Kaiserin, 2 vols (Cologne: Druckerei Locher, 1991)Google Scholar
  7. 3.
    Adelbert Davids, ed., The Empress Theophano: The Byzantines and the West at the Turn of the First Millennium (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1995)Google Scholar
  8. 3.
    Ekkehard Eickhoff, Theophanu und der König Otto III. und seine Welt (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1996).Google Scholar
  9. 3.
    For a study focused on families, see Isabelle Réal, Vie de saints, vie de famille. Representation et système de la parenté dans le Royaume mérovingien (481–751) d’après les sources hagiographiques (Turnhout: Brepols, 2001), p. 13.Google Scholar
  10. 3.
    For one reliant upon archaeological evidence, see Robin Fleming, “Bones for Historians: Putting the Body Back into Biography,” in Writing Medieval Biography, 750–1250, ed. David Bates, Julia Crick, and Sarah Hamilton (Woodbridge, Suffolk: Boydell, 2006), pp. 29–48.Google Scholar
  11. 4.
    Historians such as Jean-Pierre Devroey have examined servile female textile workers as a group and Eric Goldberg wrote a study of a single royal fabricator, Queen Emma, wife of Louis the German. Jean-Pierre Devroey, “Femmes au miroir des polyptyques: une approche des rapports du couple dans l’exploitation rurale dépendante entre Seine et Rhin au ixe siècle,” in Femmes et pouvoirs des femmes à Byzance et en occident (vie-xie siècles), ed. Alain Dierkens, Stéphane Lebecq, Régine Le Jan, and J. Sansterre (Villeneuve d’Ascq: Centre de recherche sur l’histoire de l’Europe du Nord-Ouest, 1999), pp. 227–249Google Scholar
  12. 4.
    Eric J. Goldberg, “Regina nitens sanctissima Hemma: Queen Emma (827–876), Bishop Witgar of Augsburg, and the Witgar-Belt,” in Representations of Power in Medieval Germany 800–1500, ed. Björn Weiler and Simon MacLean (Turnhout: Brepols, 2006), pp. 57–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 6.
    Guillaume Marlot, in his Le tombeau du grand Saint Rémy (Rheims: Imprimerie. de F. Bernard, 1647), annexe R 5, 200ff, provides a description of this translation. I was unable to obtain access to this book, but the following work confirms that the pillow was found intact upon the tomb’s 1646 opening.Google Scholar
  14. 6.
    Jean Mabillon, ed., Annales ordinis Sancti Benedicti occidentalium monachorum patriarchae. In quibus non modo res monasticae, sed etiam ecclesiasticae historiae non minima pars continetur, 34.42, yr. 852, 6 vols, vol. 3 (Lucae: Typus Leonardi Venturini, 1739), p. 18.Google Scholar
  15. 9.
    Marielle Martiniani-Reber, “Les textiles IXe–XIIe siècle,” in Byzance: L’art byzantin dans les collections publiques françaises, ed. Xavier Rémond (Paris: Editions de la Réunion des musées nationaux, 1992), pp. 370–381.Google Scholar
  16. 9.
    On the shroud, see J. Dupont, F. Guicherd, and G. Vial, “Le linceul de Saint-Remi,” Bullétin de CIETA 15 (1962): 38–40. This piece may be the same red shroud that, according to Hincmar’s vita, enveloped the saint’s body during the 852 translation. Vita Remigii, 29, p. 326.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Erich Brandenburg, DieNachkommen Karls des Groβen (I.-XIV. Generationen) (Leipzig: Zentralstelle für deutsche Personen- und Familiengeschichte, 1935), Table 1Google Scholar
  18. 16.
    Karl Ferdinand Werner, “Die Nachkommen Karls des Grossen bis um das Jahr 1000 (1.-8. Generation),” in Karl der Groβe. Lebenswerk und Nachleben, ed. Wolfgang Braunfels (Düsseldorf: Verlag L. Schwann, 1965), pp. 429–431, 445Google Scholar
  19. 16.
    Karl Ferdinand Werner, “Hludovicus Augustus. Gouverner l’empire chrétien—idées et réalités,” in Charlemagne’s Heir: New Perspectives on the Reign of Louis the Pious (814–840), ed. Peter Godman and Roger Collins (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1990), pp. 44–45Google Scholar
  20. 16.
    Rudolf Schieffer, “Karolingische Töchter,” in Herrschaft, Kirche, Kultur. Beiträge zur Geschichte des Mittelalters. Festschrift für Friedrich Prinz zu seinem 65. Geburtstag, ed. Georg Jenal and Stephanie Haarländer (Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1993), p. 128Google Scholar
  21. 16.
    Achim Thomas Hack, Codex Carolinus: päpstliche Epistolographie im 8. Jahrhundert, 2 vols, vol. 2 (Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 2006), Table 1.Google Scholar
  22. 18.
    Simon MacLean, “Queenship, Nunneries and Royal Widowhood in Carolingian Europe,” Past and Present 178 (2003): 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 20.
    For women at court, see Janet L. Nelson, “Women at the Court of Charlemagne: A Case of Monstrous Regiment?,” in Medieval Queenship, ed. John Carmi Parsons (New York: St. Martin’s Press, 1993), pp. 43–61Google Scholar
  24. 20.
    Janet L. Nelson, “Was Charlemagne’s Court a Courtly Society?,” in Court Culture in the Early Middle Ages: The Proceedings of the First Alcuin Conference, ed. Catherine Cubitt (Turnhout: Brepols, 2003), pp. 39–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 20.
    Janet L. Nelson, “Gendering Courts in the Early Medieval West,” in Gender in the Early Medieval World: East and West, 300–900, ed. Leslie Brubaker and Julia M. H. Smith (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2004), pp. 185–197.Google Scholar
  26. 21.
    Janet L. Nelson, Charles the Bald (London and New York: Longman Publishing, 1992), p. 36.Google Scholar
  27. 23.
    Werner, “Die Nachkommen Karls des Grossen bis um das Jahr 1000,” in Karl der Groβe, pp. 430, 433–436, 445, 448; Eduard Hlawitschka, Lotharingien und das Reich an der Schwelle der deutschen Geschichte (Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann, 1968), p. 228, n18.Google Scholar
  28. 26.
    Valerie L. Garver, Women and Aristocratic Culture in the Carolingian World (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2009), pp. 228–233.Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    Bernhard Bischoff, “Die Kölner Nonnenhandschriften und das Skriptorium von Chelles,” Mittelalterliche Studien 1 (1966): 16–34Google Scholar
  30. 32.
    Rosamond McKitterick, “Women and Literacy in the Early Middle Ages,” in Books, Scribes and Learning in the Frankish Kingdoms, 6th-9th Centuries, ed. Rosamond McKitterick (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994), pp. 1–43.Google Scholar
  31. 34.
    Elizabeth Coatsworth, “Text and Textile,” in Text, Image, Interpretation: Studies in Anglo-Saxon Literature and Its Insular Context in Honour of Ēamonn Ó Carragáin, ed. Alastair Minnis and Jane Roberts (Turnhout: Brepols, 2007), p. 189.Google Scholar
  32. 35.
    W. Fritz Volbach, Early Decorative Textiles, trans. Yuri Gabriel (London: Paul Hamlyn, 1966, trans. 1969), p. 106, 112.Google Scholar
  33. 36.
    Martiniani-Reber, “Les textiles,” in Byzance, p. 375; Franz Bock, Goldstickereien und Webereien in alter und neuer Zeit (Nuremburg: Druck und Verlag von G. P. J. Bieling, 1884), pp. 3, 9.Google Scholar
  34. 37.
    Sigrid Müller-Christensen, Das Grab des Papstes Clemens II. im Dom zu Bamberg (Munich: Verlag F. Bruckmann, 1960), p. 64.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Anna Muthesius, Byzantine Silk Weaving AD 400 to AD 1200, no. 46 (Vienna: Fassbaender, 1997), p. 85. Yet Muthesius seems certain that the band was always stitched to silk. Others have noted that movement of the embroidered bands would explain the close relationship between the silk of the pillow and some eleventh-century Byzantine silks. This replacement of the original fabric of the pillow could have occurred at various times in the eleventh century. Martiniani-Reber, “Les textiles,” in Byzance, p. 375. Alpais may have selected the original materials and design of the pillow. It is also possible that she received instructions from Hincmar of Rheims, but no record remains of such communication. Unfortunately the pillow’s patterned silk is not original to the piece. Textile scholars have been debating its age and provenance because it is an incised-twill silk. Such silks came from both the Islamic and Byzantine worlds, and it is difficult, if not sometimes impossible, to distinguish between the two. It has been suggested that the silk and the shroud of St. Remigius are early examples of a kind of Iranian silk, characterized by repeated figural motifs in pearled circles and a monochrome color that made distinguishing between motif and background difficult. Based on close analysis of the design of the pillow’s silk regardless of provenance, some textile scholars have argued that it comes from a later period than the band on which Alpais sewed her inscription. They contend that the embroidered text was sewn onto bands that were originally attached to an earlier pillow. This removal and subsequent reattachment would explain what one scholar has characterized as the “ill-fitting” appearance of the inscription. Examination of photographed details of the pillow confirms the reuse of the inscription band. At some points, the matrix fabric of the inscription has worn away. Later repairs to these portions show a differently colored thread stitching the gold-wrapped threads to the background silk, which may have made it look like the inscription was originally sewn to that silk. The same “newer” thread is also apparent in other repairs to the piece, suggesting it was used for restoration purposes and is not original.Google Scholar
  36. 38.
    Donald King, “Patterned Silks in the Carolingian Empire,” Bulletin de liaison du Centre international d’étude des textiles anciens 23 (1966): 47–52.Google Scholar
  37. 40.
    Jean-Pierre Devroey, “La démographie du polyptyque de Saint-Remi de Reims,” in Compter les Champeois, ed. Patrick Demouy and Charles Vuilliez (Rheims: Presses universitaires de Reims, 1997), p. 82.Google Scholar
  38. 41.
    Jutta Barchewitz, Von der Wirtschaftstätigkeit der Frau in der vorgeschichtlichen Zeit bis zur Entfaltung der Stadtwirtschaft (Breslau: Verlag Priebatsch Buchhandlung, 1937), pp. 42–58Google Scholar
  39. 41.
    Bruno Andreolli, “Tra podere e gineceo. Il lavoro delle donne nelle grandi aziende agrarie dell’alto medioevo,” in Donne e lavoro nell’Italia medievale, ed. Paola Galetti, Maria Giuseppina, and Bruno Andreolli (Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier, 1991), pp. 32–36.Google Scholar
  40. 44.
    Das Prümer Urbar, ed. Ingo Schwab (Düsseldorf: Droste Verlag, 1983), pp. 166–255.Google Scholar
  41. 46.
    Monika Obermeier, “Ancilla.” Beiträge zur Geschichte der unfreien Frauen im Frühmittelalter (Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus Verlagsgesellschaft, 1996), p. 184.Google Scholar
  42. 48.
    Partitio bonorum monasterii sancti Dionysii, MGH Conc. 2.2, no. 53, p. 691. Robert F. Berkhofer III, Day of Reckoning: Power and Accountability in Medieval France (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), p. 14.Google Scholar
  43. 58.
    Alain Derville, Saint-Omer des origines au debut du XIVe siècle (Lille: Presses universitaires de Lille, 1995), pp. 20–25Google Scholar
  44. 58.
    Stéphane Lebecq, Marchands et navigateurs frisons du haut moyen âge, vol. 1, pp. 131–134; Alain Derville, “The Role of the Monasteries in the Systems of Production and Exchange of the Frankish World Between the Seventh and the Beginning of the Ninth Centuries,” in The Long Eighth Century: Production, Distribution and Demand, ed. Inge Lyse Hansen and Chris Wickham (Leiden: Brill, 2000), pp. 137–139Google Scholar
  45. 58.
    Olivier Bruand, Voyageurs et marchandises aux temps carolingiens. Les réseaux de communication entre Loire et Meuse aux viiie et ixe siècles (Brussels: De Boeck, 2002), pp. 243–244.Google Scholar
  46. 59.
    Valerie L. Garver, “Old Age and Women in the Carolingian World,” in Old Age in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance: Interdisciplinary Approaches to a Neglected Topic, ed. Albrecht Classen (Berlin: DeGruyter, 2007), pp. 127–128.Google Scholar
  47. 60.
    Kathy L. Pearson, “Nutrition and the Early-Medieval Diet,” Speculum 72 (1997): 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Charlotte Newman Goldy and Amy Livingstone 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Valerie L. Garver

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations