Skip to main content

Crisis Discourse and Art Theory: Richard Wagner’s Legacy in Films by Veith von Fürstenberg and Kevin Reynolds

  • Chapter
The Medieval Motion Picture

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

  • 224 Accesses

Abstract

Just as the history of cinema is haunted by the Middle Ages, the history of medieval cinema is haunted by the works of Richard Wagner. The symbiotic relationship between the medieval and the cinematic, as encapsulated in the compound “medieval cinema,” finds its early parallel in “Wagnerian medievalism.” After all, Wagner’s operas are drawn almost exclusively from medieval sources, characters, and stories, and recent research has confirmed one of the long-standing topoi of the debate on cinema’s origins, that is, that his works’ aesthetics is protoinematic.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See Matthew Wilson Smith, The Total Work of Art: From Bayreuth to Cyberspace (New York: Routledge, 2007), pp. 31, 93–94.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wagner & Cinema, ed. Jeongwon Joe and Sander L. Gilman (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jeongwon Joe, “Why Wagner and Cinema? Tolkien Was Wrong,” in Wagner & Cinema, ed. Jeongwon Joe and Sander L. Gilman (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2010), p. 2 [1–24].

    Google Scholar 

  4. Richard Wagner, “Art and Revolution,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis, 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1892), 1: 38 [21–65].

    Google Scholar 

  5. On Wagner in Hollywood, see Klaus Reinke, “Richard Wagner im Film nach 1945,” Wagnerspectrum 4.2 (2008): 141–57.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Richard Wagner, “The Art-Work of the Future,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis, 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1892), 1:138 [69–213].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Béla Balázs, “Visible Man [1924],” in Béla Balázs: Early Film Theory. Visible Man and The Spirit of Film, ed. Erica Carter, trans. Rodney Livingstone (New York: Berghahn Books, 2010), p. 9 [9–15].

    Google Scholar 

  8. For a fundamental discussion of medievalism in film theory, see Bettina Bildhauer, Filming the Middle Ages (London: Reaktion, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richard Wagner, “German Art and German Policy,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis, 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1895), 4: 77–78 [35–148].

    Google Scholar 

  10. Theodor W. Adorno, In Search of Wagner, trans. Rodney Livingstone (London: Verso, 2009), p. 92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Richard Wagner, “A Communication to My Friends,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis, 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1892), 1: 323 [267–392].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Richard Wagner, “What Is German?” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis , 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1895), 4: 160 [149–69].

    Google Scholar 

  13. Richard Wagner, “Prelude to Tristan and Isolde,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, trans. William Ashton Ellis, 8 vols. (London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner, 1899), 8: 386 [386–87].

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner A, “A Communication to My Friends,” in Richard Wagner’s Prose Works, 1: 334. On Wagner’s “Middle Ages” as palimpsest of preexisting notions, see Dieter Borchmeyer, Richard Wagner: Ahasvers Wandlungen (Frankfurt/M.: Insel, 2002), pp. 197–208.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Richard Wagner, Tristan und Isolde, in Richard Wagner’s Tristan und Isolde, ed. and trans. Peter Bassett (Kent Town, AUS: Wakefield Press, 2006), p. 33.

    Google Scholar 

  16. On iconic tradition, see Meradith T. McMunn, “Filming the Tristan Myth. From Text to Icon,” in Cinema Arthuriana: Essays on Arthurian Film, ed. Kevin J. Harty (New York: Garland, 1991), pp. 169–80.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hermann Kappelhoff, “Film und Schauspielkunst: Fassbinder und Brecht,” in Grauzonen. Positionen zwischen Literatur und Film 1910–1960, ed. Stefan Keppler-Tasaki and Fabienne Liptay (Munich: text + kritik, 2010), p. 257 [257–72] [my translation].

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hans Jürgen Syberberg, Hitler. Ein Film aus Deutschland, transl. Joachim Neugroschel (New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 1982), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Veith von Fürstenberg, “Vorwort” [preface to a draft of the film], reprinted in Alain Kerdelhué, “Feuer und Schwert. Lecture materielle du mythe,” in Tristan et Iseut: mythe européen et mondial, ed. Danielle Buschinger (Göppingen: Kümmerle, 1987), pp. 193–94 [181–96] [my translation].

    Google Scholar 

  20. Michael Dost, Florian Hopf, and Alexander Kluge, Filmwirtschaft in der BRD und in Europa: Götterdämmerung in Raten (Munich: Hanser, 1973), p. 7 [my translation].

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hermann Glaser, Die Kulturgeschichte der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, 3 vols. (Frankfurt/M.: Fischer, 1990), 3: 216.

    Google Scholar 

  22. The two films typify two different “cultures of reception” as defined by Mathias Herweg and myself as distinct spheres pursuing their own emphases, rules, and aims with regard to medial perception and adaptation of diachronous and/or synchronous foreign cultures and cultural elements. Mathias Herweg and Stefan Keppler-Tasaki, “Mittelalterrezeption. Gegenstände und Theorieansätze eines Forschungsgebiets im Schnittpunkt von Mediävistik, Frühneuzeit- und Moderneforschung,” in Rezeptionskulturen. 500 Jahre literarischer Mittelalterrezeption zwischen Kanon und Populärkultur, ed. Mathias Herweg and Stefan Keppler-Tasaki (Berlin: de Gruyter, 2011), pp. 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kinowelt Filmverleih, Tristan & Isolde [press sheet] (Berlin: Kinowelt Filmverleih, 2006), p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dean Georgaris, quoted in: Yon Motskin, “Tristan & Isolde,” in Creative Screenwriting 13.1 (2006): 32.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cf. Rosemarie Lühr, “Tristan im Kymrischen,” in Tristan und Isolt im Spätmittelalter, ed. Xenja von Ertzdorff (Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1999), p. 144 [141–68].

    Google Scholar 

  26. John Donne, “The Good-morrow,” in John Donne, The Elegies and The Songs and Sonnets, ed. Helen Gardner (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1965), pp. 70–71.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2014 Andrew James Johnston, Margitta Rouse, and Philipp Hinz

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Keppler-Tasaki, S. (2014). Crisis Discourse and Art Theory: Richard Wagner’s Legacy in Films by Veith von Fürstenberg and Kevin Reynolds. In: Johnston, A.J., Rouse, M., Hinz, P. (eds) The Medieval Motion Picture. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137074249_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics