Abstract
In recent years, anthropomorphism has received bad press, as a simplistic or excessively sentimental mode of thought. For purposes of animal studies, the error of anthropomorphism is the presumption inherent in attributing human attributes to animals. In so doing, we deprive animals of their own subjectivity and impose what Rosi Braidotti describes as an “asymmetric relation to animals” that is “framed by power relations biased in favor of human access to the bodies of animal others.”1
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Rosi Braidotti, “Animals, Anomalies, and Inorganic Others,” PMLA 124.2 (2009): 526 [526-32].
Kathryn Lynch, “East Meets West in Chaucer’s Squire’s and Franklin’s Tales,” Speculum 70.3 (July 1995): 542 [530-51].
Carolynn Van Dyke, Chaucer’s Agents: Cause and Representation in Chaucerian Narrative (Madison, NJ: Farleigh Dickinson University Press, 2005), pp. 106, 102.
J. S. Kennedy, The New Anthropomorphism (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1992), p. 3.
Lorraine Daston and Gregg Mitman, Thinking with Animals: New Perspectives on Anthropomorphism (New York: Columbia University Press, 2005), pp. ([0-9])–([0-9]).
Onno Dag Oerlemans, Romanticism and the Materiality of Nature (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), p. 68.
David T. Mitchell and Sharon L. Snyder, Narrative Prosthesis: Disabilities and the Dependencies of Discourse (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2000), p. 47. For a discussion of the use of animals as metaphors see Susan McHugh, “Literary Animal Agents,” PMLA 124.2 (2009): ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+); and Zoltán Kövecses, Metaphor: A Practical Introduction (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).
Susan Crane, Gender and Romance in Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).
Jill Mann, Feminizing Chaucer, Chaucer Studies 30 (Woodbridge, UK: D. S. Brewer, 2002), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).
James A. W. Heffernan, Museum of Words: The Poetics of Ekphrasis from Homer to Ashbery (Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 1993), p. 1.
Gary L. Francione, Rain without Thunder: The Ideology of the Animal Rights Movement (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1996), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).
Taimie L. Bryant, “Similarity or Difference as a Basis for Justice: Must Animals Be Like Humans to Be Legally Protected from Humans?,” Law and Contemporary Problems 70 (Winter, 2007): 208 [207-54].
Josephine Donovan and Carol J. Adams, The Feminist Care Tradition in Animal Ethics: A Reader (New York: Columbia University Press, 2007), pp. ([0-9])–([0-9]).
Carol Gilligan, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982), p. 19.
Eva Feder Kittay, Love’s Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependency (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 107.
Karen Warner, “The Power and Promise of Ecofeminism,” Environmental Ethics 12.2 (1990): 143 [125-43].
Martha C. Nussbaum, Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, and Species Membership (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2006), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Carolynn Van Dyke
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schotland, S.D. (2012). Avian Hybridity in “The Squire’s Tale”: Uses of Anthropomorphism. In: Van Dyke, C. (eds) Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040732_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040732_8
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34161-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-04073-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)