Skip to main content

That Which Chargeth Not to Say: Animal Imagery in Troilus and Criseyde

  • Chapter
Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts

Part of the book series: The New Middle Ages ((TNMA))

  • 221 Accesses

Abstract

As the second book of Troilus and Criseyde opens, Pandarus has had a bad night. He is eventually awakened from a fitful sleep by the “swalowe Proigne,” lamenting “whi she forshapen was” and “cheterynge / How Tereus gan forth hire suster take.”1 Procne’s chattering seems out of place in several ways. For one thing, her tale of rape and revenge violates the courtly though casual tone of the main narrative. For another, Procne is out of her historical (or mythic) milieu. A third anomaly, less conspicuous but central to our concerns in this book, is that she is the only nonhuman character to act or speak in the poem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Sanford Brown Meech, Design in Chaucer’s Troilus (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1959), p. 323. Meech lists the animal images in section 6 of chapter III (pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+)).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beryl Rowland, Blind Beasts: Chaucer’s Animal World (Kent, OH: Kent State University Press, 1971), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. V. A. Kolve, Telling Images: Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative II (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2009), p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See Bartholomaeus Anglicus, On the Properties of Things (De proprietatibus rerum), trans. John Trevisa, 3 vols. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+)), XVIII.vii; also Rowland, Blind Beasts, pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+), and Kolve, Telling Images, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lee Patterson, Chaucer and the Subject of History (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991), pp. ([0-9]+)–([0-9]+).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. C. Spearing, The Medieval Poet as Voyeur: Looking and Listening in Medieval Love-Narratives (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1993), p. 121.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Carolynn Van Dyke

Copyright information

© 2012 Carolynn Van Dyke

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Van Dyke, C. (2012). That Which Chargeth Not to Say: Animal Imagery in Troilus and Criseyde. In: Van Dyke, C. (eds) Rethinking Chaucerian Beasts. The New Middle Ages. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040732_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics