Abstract
Discussions of reform in higher education often look away from the elephants in the room. The sheer size of most Canadian postsecondary institutions, the complexity of their administrative structures, the stasis of their traditions, and the bulk of their contractual obligations and labor agreements—all these tend to weigh reform down. Changing the course of such a juggernaut is more than a challenge. Even with a clear sighting of the reefs ahead, it takes extraordinary leadership and unusual unanimity of buy-in from all the stakeholders to turn such a ship around. We all must admit that, even with genuine goodwill and genuine spending, genuine reform seldom happens. What to do?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Reference
Curtis, John W., and Monica F. Jacobe. 2006. “Consequences: An Increasingly Contingent Faculty.” In AAUP Contingent Faculty Index 2006. Washington, DC: AAUP. http://www.aaup.org.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Hans G. Schuetze, William Bruneau, and Garnet Grosjean
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cohn, J. (2012). Liberality and Collaborative Governance in a New Private University: The Experience of Quest University Canada. In: Schuetze, H.G., Bruneau, W., Grosjean, G. (eds) University Governance and Reform. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040107_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137040107_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-34276-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-04010-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Education CollectionEducation (R0)