Abstract
In Snow, Ka, a struggling poet returning from a decade-long selfinflicted exile in Germany, is commissioned by a national news paper to report on young, religious girls committing suicide in Kars, in Eastern Turkey. Once a cosmopolitan city with “thousandyear-old churches,” “a large Armenian community,” Persians, Greeks, Kurds, Georgians, and Circassians, Kars is now a poverty-stricken provincial outpost suffering from “destitution, depression, and decay.”1 As Ka makes the journey on a bus in the thick of winter, it begins to snow, which he sees as “a promise, a sign pointing back to the happiness and purity he had once known as a child” (4); he is inspired to write a poem, titled “The Silence of Snow.” The “inner peace” that the poet initially feels, however, is gradually replaced by an apprehension brought about by the escalating snowstorm; it becomes “tiring, irritating, terrorizing,” creating “a fearful silence” among the passengers (5). As the bus continues its journey, it literally distances Ka from the familiarity of the Western values of Istanbul. Upon arrival, he feels culturally displaced in “a ghost town” of idleness and extremism, where human rights are violated and privacy laws are meaningless. Most importantly, the journey to the periphery of the nation forces Ka to enter into the ongoing political struggle between secularists and Islamists, and to rethink the usual rhetorical depiction of this struggle.2
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Pamuk, Snow, trans. Maureen Freely (London: Faber and Faber, 2004), p. 21. All future references are to this edition and will be cited parenthetically in the text.
The tension between secularism and Islamism in Turkey is as old as the Republic. Article 2 of the Turkish Constitution reads The republic of Turkey is a democratic, secular (laik) and social State based on the rule of law, respectful of human rights in a spirit of social peace, national solidarity and justice, adhering to the nationalism of Ataturk and resting on the fundamental principles set out in the Preamble. (Qtd. in Dominic McGoldrick, Human Rights and religion: The Islamic Headscarf Debate in Europe [Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2006], p. 133)
Of course, “Islamism” is itself a problematic term. “Islamists” themselves find this label objectionable, preferring to identify themselves simply as “proper Muslims,” invested in restoring “the classical theological tradition by translating it into [a] contemporary political predicament” (Talal Asad, Formations of the Secular: Christianity, Islam, Modernity [Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003], p. 198).
Abdelwahab Elmessiri, “Secularism, Immanence and Destruction,”, Islam and Secularism in the Middle East. ed. Azzam Tamimi and John L. Esposito (New York: New York University Press, 2000), p. 67.
Bobby S. Sayyid, A Fundamental Fear: Eurocentrism and the Emergence of Islamism (London: Zed Books Ltd., 1997), p. 8.
Wendy Smith, “Orhan Pamuk: Outspoken Turk,” Publishers Weekly 251.34 (2004).
Yolande Jansen, “Laïcité or the Politics of Republican Secularism,”, Political Theologies, ed. Hent de Vries and Lawrence Eugene Sullivan (New York: Fordham University Press, 2006), p. 476.
See Menderes Çinar and Burhanettin Duran, “The Specific Evolution of Contemporary Political Islam in Turkey and Its ‘Difference,’”, Secular and Islamic Politics in Turkey: The Making of the Justice and Development Party, ed. Ümit Cizre (Oxon: Routledge, 2008), 33.
“[T]he veil and segregation epitomized that oppression, and that these customs were fundamental for the general and comprehensive backwardness of Islamic societies.” Leila Ahmed, “The Discourse of the Veil,”, Postcolonialisms: An Anthology of Cultural Theory and Criticism, ed. Gaurav Desai and Supriya Nair (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2005), pp. 321–322.
See Ibrahim Kaya’s Social Theory and Later Modernities: The Turkish Experience (Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 2004).
Matthew Levinger and Paula Franklin Lytle, “Myth and Mobilisation: The Triadic Structure of Nationalist Rhetoric,” Nations and Nationalism 7 (2003): 178.
See Mustafa Akyol, “The Threat of Secular Fundamentalism,” The New York Times, May 04, 2007.
Erdag Göknar, “Orhan Pamuk and the Ottoman Theme,” World Literature Today 80 (2006): 34.
Z. Esra Mirze, “Implementing Disform: An Interview with Orhan Pamuk,” PMLA 123 (2008): 176–180.
John Gregg, Maurice Blanchot and the Literature of Transgression (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994), p. 30.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 2012 Mehnaz M. Afridi and David M. Buyze
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Santesso, E.M. (2012). Silence, Secularism, and Fundamentalism in Snow . In: Afridi, M.M., Buyze, D.M. (eds) Global Perspectives on Orhan Pamuk. Literatures and Cultures of the Islamic World. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137039545_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137039545_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-29568-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-03954-5
eBook Packages: Palgrave Literature CollectionLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)