Skip to main content

ICT-Enabled Scalable Workshops for Engineering College Teachers in India

  • Chapter
Post-Secondary Education and Technology

Part of the book series: International and Development Education ((INTDE))

Abstract

Education has evolved over the years from basic reading and writing to the present-day globalized view. As we move from the era of low technology to highly sophisticated technology, there is a growing need for a skilled workforce at all levels of the society. There is a greater demand for continuing professional development and providing equal opportunities for all. However, to reach out to a maximum number of people in the society, it is necessary to break the social, economical, geographical, time, and space barriers in education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Altbach, Philip G., Liz Reisberg, and Laura E. Rumbley. 2010. “Tracking a Global Academic Revolution.” Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 42 (2): 29–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Deborah L., and Hyman Bass. 2000. “Interweaving Content and Pedagogy in Teaching and Learning to Teach: Knowing and Using Mathematics.” In Multiple Perspectives on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics, ed. Jo Boaler, 83–104. Westport, CT: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, Deborah L., Heather. C. Hill, and Hyman Bass. 2005. “KnowingMathematics for Teaching: Who Knows Mathematics Well Enough to Teach Third Grade, and How Can We Decide?” American Educator 29 (3): 14–22, 43–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billingsley, Bonnie, Anna-Maria Fall, and Thomas Williams. 2006. “Who is Teaching Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders? A Profile and Comparison to Other Special Educators.” Behavioral Disorders 31 (3): 252–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackboard. 2010–11. Drexel University Online Learning Management System. Available at: http://drexel.blackboard.com.

  • CEC (Council for Exceptional Children), n.d. Policy on Academic Subject Matter Content of General Curriculum and Special Educators. Arlington, VA: CEC Available online at: http://www.cec.sped.org.

  • Cobb, Paul, Michelle Stephan, Kay McClain, and Koeno Gravemeijer. 2001. “Participating in Classroom Mathematical Practices.” The Journal Of The Learning Sciences 10 (1–2): 113–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greer, Diana, and Edward Meyen. 2009. “Special Education Teacher Education: A Perspective on Content Knowledge.” Learning Disabilities Research & Practice. 24 (4): 196–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Individuals with Disabilites Education Improvement Act of 2004. 2006. Pub. L. No. 108-446. § 118, Stat. 2647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, Magdalene. 1990. “When the Problem Is Not the Question and the Solution Is Not the Answer: Mathematical Knowing and Teaching.” American Educational Research Journal’ 27 (1): 29–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma, Liping. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding of Fundamental Mathematics in China and the United States. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-110, § 115, Stat. 1425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, Jason, and Ellen Clay. 2010. “Towards A Model for Supporting Teachers Development of Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching in an Online Environment.” In Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2010, ed. David Gibson and Bernie Dodge, 884–891. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, Martin. 2006. “Key Developmental Understandings in Mathematics: A Direction for Investigating and Establishing Learning Goals.” Mathematical Thinking and Learning: An International Journals (4): 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinto, Vincent. 2006–2007. “Research and Practice of Student Retention: What Next?” Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice 8 (1): 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooten, Brent, and Thomas Hancock. 2009. “Online Learning Offers Flexibility and Convenience for Teacher Education.” Momentum 40 (1): 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yackel, Erna, and Paul Cobb. 1996. “Sociomathematical Norms, Argumentation, and Autonomy in Mathematics.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 27 (4): 458–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Rebecca Clothey Stacy Austin-Li John C. Weidman

Copyright information

© 2012 Rebecca Clothey, Stacy Austin-Li, and John C. Weidman

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kannan, K., Narayanan, K. (2012). ICT-Enabled Scalable Workshops for Engineering College Teachers in India. In: Clothey, R., Austin-Li, S., Weidman, J.C. (eds) Post-Secondary Education and Technology. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137037770_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics