Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Postscript: The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre-paradigmatic Field

  • Chapter
Social Enterprises

Abstract

It has become axiomatic in recent years for scholars to make two observations concerning social entrepreneurship: first, that there is no definitive consensus about what the term actually means (Light, 2006, 2008; Perrini, 2006); second, that the research agenda for the field is not yet clearly defined (Nicholls, 2006a, 2006b, 2009; Short et al., 2009). It has also been noted that the community of scholars currently engaging with the subject is small, under-resourced, and somewhat marginalized (Battle Anderson & Dees, 2006). Kuhn (1962) observed that an established academic paradigm attracts legitimacy and resources to a field of action that are largely withheld in a pre-paradigmatic state. Following Kuhn, the current status of social entrepreneurship can be conceptualized as a field that has yet to achieve a paradigmatic consensus and that lacks a ‘normal science’ or clear epistemology. However, despite the apparent constraints of its pre-paradigmatic status, an analysis of social entrepreneurship suggests that emergent patterns of institutionalization can be discerned, each characterized by its own discourses, narrative logics and ideal-type organizational models. Such patterns are characterized here as contests for the control of the legitimating discourses that will determine the final shape of the social entrepreneurial paradigm. This is a particular characteristic of a field that is at a less well-developed stage of legitimacy than the key paradigm-building actors within it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abbott, A. (1988). The System of Professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiken, M. (2006). “Towards Market or State? Tensions and Opportunities in the Evolutionary Path of Three Types of UK Social Enterprise.” In M. Nyssens (ed.), Towards Market or State? Tensions and Opportunities in the Evolutionary Path of Three UK Social Enterprises. London: Routledge, pp. 259271.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. and Baker, T. (1997). “Blinded by the Cities? Has There Been Progress in Entrepreneurship Research?” In D. Sexton and R. Smilor (Eds.), Entrepreneurship 2000. Chicago: Upstart Publishing, pp. 377–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldrich, H. and Fiol, C. (1994). “Fools Rush In? The Institutional Context of Industry Creation.” Academy of Management Review 19: 645–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, K. (2006). A Social Enterprise Typology, www.virtueventures.com/typology.php

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvord, S., Brown, L., and Letts, C. (2004). “Social Entrepreneurship and Societal Transformation: An Exploratory Study.” Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3): 260–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. and Gibbs, B. (1990). “The Double Edge of Organizational Legitimation.” Organization Science, 1, 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, J., Gutierrez, R., and Ogliastri, E. (2006). Effective Management of Social Enterprises: Lessons from Business and Civil Society Organizations in Ibero-America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, M. (1999). “Users as Citizens: Collective Action and the Local Governance of Welfare.” Social Policy and Administration, 33(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battle Anderson, B. and Dees, J.G. (2006). “Rhetoric, Reality, and Research: Building a Solid Foundation for the Practice of Social Entrepreneurship.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 144–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baum, J. and Powell, W. (1995). “Cultivating An Institutional Ecology of Organizations: Comment on Hannan, Carroll, Dundon, and Torres.” American Sociological Review, 60: 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, T. (2006). OTS (Office of the Third Sector) (2006), Social Enterprise Action Plan: Scaling New Heights. London: Cabinet Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, D. (2004). How to Change the World: Social Entrepreneurs and the Power of New Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzaga, C. and Defourny, J. (2001). The Emergence of Social Enterprise. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovaird, T. (2006). “Developing New Relationships with the ‘Market’ in the Procurement of Public Services.” Public Administration, 84(1): 81–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busenitz, L., Page West, G., Shepherd, D., Nelson, T., Chandler, G., and Zacharakis, A. (2003). “Entrepreneurship Research in Emergence: Past Trends and Future Directions.” Journal of Management, 29(3): 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, S. and Deephouse, D. (1999). “‘Tough Talk’ Or ‘Soothing Speech’: Managing Reputations for Being Tough and Being Good.” Corporate Reputation Review, 2: 308–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clotfelter, C. (Ed.). (1992). Who Benefits from the Nonprofit Sector? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dart, R. (2004). “The Legitimacy of Social Enterprise.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14(4), 411–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, G., McAdam, D., Scott, W., and Zald, M. (2005). Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. (1996). “Does Isomorphism Legitimate?” Academy of Management Journal, 39(4): 1024–1039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deephouse, D. and Suchman, M. (2008). “Legitimacy in Organizational Institutionalism.” In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, and R. Suddaby (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism. London: Sage, pp. 49–77.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983). “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review, 48: 147–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiMaggio, P. and Powell, W. (1991). “Introduction.” In P. Di Maggio and W. Powell (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organisational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowling, J. and Pfeffer, J. (1975). “Organizational Legitimacy: Social Values and Organizational Behavior.” Pacific Sociological Review, 18: 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2008). Just Another Emperor? The Myths and Realities of Philanthrocapitalism. London: The Young Foundation/Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, M. (2010). Small Change: Why Business Won’t Save the World. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkington, J. and Hartigan, P. (2008). The Power of Unreasonable People. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. (1994). “Managing Organizational Legitimacy in the California Cattle Industry: the Construction and Effectiveness of Verbal Accounts.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 57–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsbach, K. and Sutton, R. (1992). “Acquiring Organizational Legitimacy through Illegitimate Actions: a Marriage of Institutional and Impression Management Theories.” Academy of Management Journal, 35: 699–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evers, A. and Laville, J.-L. (2004). The Third Sector in Europe. London: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R. and Alford, R. (1991). “Bringing Society Back in: Symbols, Practices and Institutional Contradictions.” In P. Di Maggio and W. Powell (Eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 232–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). “Interorganizational Relations.” Annual Review of Sociology, 11: 281–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1998). The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (2000). The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, P. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship: Agency in a Globalizing World.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 119–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargens, L. (1988). “Scholarly Consensus and Journal Rejection Rates.” American Sociological Review, 53, 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargrave, T. and Van der Ven, A. (2006). “a Collective Action Model of Institutional Innovation.” Academy of Management Review, 31(4): 864–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, R. and Leitch, C. (1996). “Discipline Emergence in Entrepreneurship: Accumulative Fragmentalism Or Paradigmatic Science.” Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Change, 5(2): 65–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hybels, R. (1995). “On Legitimacy, Legitimation, and Organizations: a Critical Review and Integrative Theoretical Model.” Best Paper Proceedings of the Academy of Management, 241–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (2008). “Framing Contests: Strategy Making Under Uncertainty.” Organization Science, 19: 729–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (1997). The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. (2003). Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy. of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LeGrand, J. and Bartlett, W. (Eds.). (1993). Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. (2006). “Reshaping Social Entrepreneurship.” Stanford Social Innovation Review Fall: 47–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P. (2008). The Search for Social Entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, J. and Gordon, G. (1972). “The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Functioning of University Graduate Departments.” American Sociological Review, 37: 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lodahl, J. and Gordon, G. (1973). “Differences between Physical and Social Sciences in University Graduate Departments.” Research in Higher Education, 1: 191–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. (2007). “a Tale of Two Cities: Competing Logics and Practice Variation in the Professionalizing of Mutual Funds.” Academy of Management Journal, 50: 289–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. and Glynn, M.A. (2001). “Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources.” Strategic Management Journal, 22, 545–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lounsbury, M. and Strang, D. (2009). “Social Entrepreneurship. Success Stories and Logic Construction.” In D. Hammack and S. Heydemann (Eds.), Globalization, Philanthropy, and Civil Society. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, S. (1974). Power: a Radical View. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1973). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Rowan, B. (1977). “Institutionalised Organisations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. and Scott, W. (1983). “Centralization and the Legitimacy Problems of Local Government.” In J.W. Meyer and W.R. Scott (Eds.), Organizational Environments: Ritual and Rationality. London: Sage, pp. 199–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Scott, R., Cole, S., and Intili, J. (1978). “Instructional Dissensus and Institutional Consensus in Schools.” In M. Meyer (Ed.), Environments and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Scott, R., and Deal, T. (1981). “Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure: Explaining the Structure of Organizations.” In H. Stein (Ed.), Organization and the Human Services. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, pp. 151–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, G. (2006). Images of Organization. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan, G. (2007). Social innovation. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/skoll/research/Short+papers/Short+papers.htm

  • NCVO (National Council of Voluntary Organizations). (2008). uk Voluntary Sector Almanac 2007. London: National Council of Voluntary Organizations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2006a). “Playing the Field: a New Approach to the Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship.” Social Enterprise Journal, 2(1): 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2006b). “Introduction: the Meanings of Social Entrepreneurship.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2008). “Capturing the Performance of the Socially Entrepreneurial Organisation (seo): An Organisational Legitimacy Approach.” In J. Robinson, J. Mair, and K. Hockerts (Eds.), International Perspectives on Social Entrepreneurship Research. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2009). “Learning to Walk: Social Entrepreneurship”.” Innovations: Special Edition Skoll World Forum: 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010a). “What Gives Fair Trade Its Right to Operate? Organisational Legitimacy and the Strategic Management of Social Entrepreneurship.” In K. Macdonald and S. Marshall (Eds.), Fair Trade Corporate Accountability and beyond: Experiments in Global Justice Governance Mechanisms. London: Ashgate, pp. 95–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010b). “Institutionalizing Social Entrepreneurship in Regulatory Space: Reporting and Disclosure by Community Interest Companies.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35: 394–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010c). “The Institutionalization of Social Investment: the Interplay of Investment Logics and Investor Rationalities.” Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(1): 70–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Cho, A. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship: the Structuration of a Field.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 99–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A., and Murdock, A. (2011). Social Innovation, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Pharoah, C. (2007). The Landscape of Social Finance. Oxford: Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/centres/skoll/research/Pages/socialfinance.aspx

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. and Young, R. (2008). “Introduction: the Changing Landscape of Social Entrepreneurship.” In A. Nicholls (Ed.), Social Entrepreneurship: New Paradigms of Sustainable Social Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press: vii–xxiii.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyssens, M. (Ed.). (2006). Social Enterprise. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1997). “Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Combining Institutional and Resource-Based Views.” Strategic Management Journal, 18: 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, S. and Martin, R. (2007). “Social Entrepreneurship: the Case for Definition.” Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring: 28–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osbourne, D. and Gaebler, T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • OTS (Office of the Third Sector). (2006). Social Enterprise Action Plan: Scaling New Heights. London: Office of The Third Sector.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peredo, A. and McLean, M. (2006). “Social Entrepreneurship: a Critical Review of the Concept.” Journal of World Business, 41: 56–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. (Ed.). (2006). The New Social Entrepreneurship: What Awaits Social Entrepreneurship Ventures? Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1993). “Barriers to the Advance of Organizational Science: Paradigm Development as a Dependent Variable.” Academy of Management Review, 18(4): 599–620.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Moore, W. (1980). “Power in University Budgeting: a Replication and Extension.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 25: 637–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: a Resource Dependency Perspective. New York: Harper Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., Lawrence, T., and Hardy, C. (2004). “Discourse and Institutions.” Academy of Management Review, 29: 635–652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C.K. (2005). The Fortune at the Bottom of the Pyramid: Eradicating Poverty through Profit. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, H. (1994). “The Social Construction of Reputation: Certification Contests, Legitimation, and the Survival of Organizations in the American Automobile Industry 1895–1912.” Strategic Management Journal, 15: 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, G. and Wittich, C. (Eds.). (1978). Economy and society. San Francisco: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruef, M. and Scott, W. (1998). “a Multidimensional Model of Organizational Legitimacy: Hospital Survival in Changing Institutional Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 877–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L. and Anheier, H. (1999). The Emerging Sector Revisited. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, L., Anheier, H., List, R., Toepler, S., and Sokolowski, S. (Eds.). (2003). Global Civil Society: Dimensions of the Nonprofit Sector. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, W.R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, E. and Carter, S. (2007). “Social Entrepreneurship; Theoretical Antecedents and Empirical Analysis of Entrepreneurial Processes and Outcomes.” Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 14(3): 418–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short, J., Moss, T., and Lumpkin, G. (2009). “Research in Social Entrepreneurship: Past Contributions and Future Opportunities.” Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 3, 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, J., Tucker, D., and House, R. (1986). “Organizational Legitimacy and the Liability of Newness.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Social Enterprise Unit. (2002). Social Enterprise: a Strategy for Success. London: Department for Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stryker, R. (2000). “Legitimacy Processes as Institutional Politics: Implications for Theory and Research in the Sociology of Organizations.” Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 17: 179–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, M. (1995). “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches.” Academy of Management Review, 20: 517–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. (2005). “Rhetorical Strategies of Legitimacy.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan Mort, G., Weerawardena, J., and Carnegie, K. (2003). “Social Entrepreneurship: towards Conceptualisation.” International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8(1): 76–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaara, E., Tienari, J., and Laurila, J. (2006). “Pulp and Paper Fiction: on the Discursive Legitimation of Global Industrial Restructuring.” Organization Studies, 27: 789–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, K. (1995). Public Services and Market Mechanisms. Competition, Contracting, and the New Public Management. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J. and Sullivan Mort, G. (2006). “Investigating Social Entrepreneurship: a Multidimensional Model.” Journal of World Business, 41: 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoels, W. (1974). “The Structure of Scientific Fields and the Allocation of Editorships on Scientific Journals: Some Observations on the Politics of Knowledge.” Sociological Quarterly, 15: 264–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunus, M. (2008). Creating a World without Poverty: Social Business and the Future of Capitalism. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, M. and Zeitz, G. (2002). “Beyond Survival: Achieving New Venture Growth by Building Legitimacy.” Academy of Management Review, 27(3): 414–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, L. (1977). “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” American Journal of Sociology, 42: 726–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Alex Nicholls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Israeli Social Enterprise Research Center, Beit Berl Academic College, Israel

    Benjamin Gidron

  2. UCLA Luskin School of Public Affairs, USA

    Yeheskel Hasenfeld

Copyright information

© 2012 Alex Nicholls

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nicholls, A. (2012). Postscript: The Legitimacy of Social Entrepreneurship: Reflexive Isomorphism in a Pre-paradigmatic Field. In: Gidron, B., Hasenfeld, Y. (eds) Social Enterprises. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137035301_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation