Skip to main content

Community Development, Community Organising and Third Sector-University Research Partnerships

  • Chapter
Community Research for Community Development

Abstract

This book sets out to explore the contributions that research can provide, supporting Third Sector organisations concerned with community development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alinsky, S. (1971) Rules for Radicals: A Practical Primer for Realistic Radicals, New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (2011) Collateral Damage, Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, B., Gaventa, J. and Peters, J., eds. (1990) We Make the Road by Walking: Conversations on Education and Social Change, Myles Horton and Paulofreire, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boal, A. (1979) Theatre of the Oppressed, London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, K. and Pettit, J., eds. (2007) Springs ofParticipation, Rugby: Practical Action Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E., eds. (2000) New Managerialism: New Welfare? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabinet Office, UK Government, www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/content/big-society-overview, accessed 15 February 2012.

  • Clarke, J., Smith, N. and Vidler, E. (2006) ‘The Indeterminacy of Choice: Political and Organisational Implications’ Social Policy and Society, 5, 3, 327–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coben, D. (1995) ‘Revisiting Gramsci’ Studies in the Education of Adults, 27, 1, 36–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G., Burchardt, T. and Gordon, G., eds. (2008) Social Justice and Public Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Craig, G., Mayo, M., Popple, K., Shaw, M. and Taylor, M., eds. (2011) The Community Development Reader: History, Themes and Issues, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eversley, J. (2009) Direct Action and Grassroots Democracy: The Legacy ofSaul Alinsky (www.gold.ac.uk/clice/pastevents/).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fals-Borda, O. and Rahman, A. (1991) Action and Knowledge: Breaking the Monopoly with Participatory Action-Research, London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. (1972) Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire, P. and Shor, I. (1997) Pedagogy for Liberation, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaventa, J. (2004) ‘Towards Participatory Governance: Assessing the Transformative Possibilities’ in S. Hickey and G. Mohan, eds. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation, London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. and Schlappa, H. (2007) “Hoovering Up the Money?”: Deliver-ing Government-Funded Capacity-Building Programmes to Voluntary and Community Organisations’ Social Policy and Society, 7, 2, 135–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, S. and Mohan, G. (2004) Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? London: Zed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holst, J. (2002) Social Movement, Civil Society, and Radical Adult Education, Westport Connecticut and London: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith, M. and Springett, J. (2010) Participatory Practice: Community-Based Action for Transformative Change, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. (2008) ‘Introduction: Communities, Contestations, Continuities and Change’ in G. Craig, K. Popple and M. Shaw, eds. Community Development in Theory and Practice, Nottingham: Spokesman, 13–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. and Annette, J. (2010) Taking Part? Active Learning for Active Citizenship, and Beyond, Leicester: NIACE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo, M. and Rooke, A. (2006) Active Learning for Active Citizenship, London: Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayo. M, Mendiwelson-Bendek, Z. and Packham, C. (2012) ‘Learning to Take Part as Active Citizens: Emerging Lessons for Community Organising in Britain’ Voluntary Sector Review, 3, 2, 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. and Hatamian, A. (2011) Take Part Final Report, London: Community Development Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, J. and Robson, S. (2010) ‘Does Community Organising Empower or Oppress?’ CDX Magazine, winter 2010, CDX.

    Google Scholar 

  • New Economics Foundation (NEF), www.neweconomics.org/publications/cutting-it, accessed 15 February 2012.

  • Newman, K. (2008) ‘Whose View Matters? Using Participatory Processes to Evaluate Reflect in Nigeria’ Community Development Journal, 43, 3, 382–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, R. (2007) Revisiting the Welfare State, Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powell, M., ed. (2008) Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, P. and Newman, I., eds. (2011) Promoting Social Cohesion: Implications for Policy and Evaluation, Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tandon, R., ed. (2005) Participatory Research: Revisiting the Roots, New Delhi: Mosaic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (2011) Public Policy in the Community, 2nd edition, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Gooby, P. and Stoker, G. (2011) ‘The Coalition Programme: A New Vision for Britain or Politics as Usual?’ Political Quarterly, 82, 1, 4–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, V. (2004) Active Learning for Active Citizenship, London: CRU, Home Office.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2013 Marjorie Mayo, Zoraida Mendiwelso-Bendek and Carol Packham

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mayo, M., Mendiwelso-Bendek, Z., Packham, C. (2013). Community Development, Community Organising and Third Sector-University Research Partnerships. In: Mayo, M., Mendiwelso-Bendek, Z., Packham, C. (eds) Community Research for Community Development. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137034748_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics